Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-26-2014, 06:30 PM   #301
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Reinhart has incredible IQ with the puck. Hangs on to the last second to make plays, can make plays out of nothing. Has a decent amount of flash, don't know which Reinhart you've been watching. Maybe a bit on the slow side, but thinks the play way ahead of the defenders trying to take the puck off him. Doesn't have a great defensive game, at least not when compared to players like Bennett. Uses his smarts more than his physical strength.

Monahan has great IQ without the puck. And he uses his body and strength well to get to the net when the puck is on his stick, but he doesn't have amazing playmaking skills and can't exactly dangle his way through the offensive zone. Has very little flash, but is effective because he gets himself in the right place at the right time to finish plays with little effort, which is still very impressive. Because of his positional smarts, he already has a pretty strong defensive game.

Other than them both being not the fastest skaters, there are certainly differences.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2014, 06:54 PM   #302
StrykerSteve
Ass Handler
 
StrykerSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goriders View Post
My preference in 2 years:

Gaudreau - McDavid - Poirier
Ferland - Monahan - Colborne
Wolf - Bennett - Bouma

Bigger, faster and more skill. A lot of toughness too intermixed. One or two guys on each line. Not 100% sure on Ferland, but hopeful. Also took Wolf as a dark horse.

Doubt we get McDavid though. We're not Oilers bad and we're going to get better.

Poor Klimchuk, never stood a chance.
StrykerSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to StrykerSteve For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2014, 07:01 PM   #303
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

I hope Ferland, Colborne, Wolf and Bouma can score and obviously we need to win the lottery.
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 07:01 PM   #304
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerSteve View Post
Poor Klimchuk, never stood a chance.
And Baertschi.
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mile For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2014, 07:02 PM   #305
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Well if it helps players like Baertschi, Klimchuk, Jankowski etc...Ferland, Colborne, Bouma and Wolf aren't top 9 players. Maybe Ferland, maybe.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2014, 07:04 PM   #306
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Well if it helps players like Baertschi, Klimchuk, Jankowski etc...Ferland, Colborne, Bouma and Wolf aren't top 9 players. Maybe Ferland, maybe.
Bouma and Colborne are acceptable 3rd liners too.

Edit: Add Granlund, Reinhart, and Backlund in that missing group of top 9 guys too.

Last edited by mile; 06-26-2014 at 07:08 PM.
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mile For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2014, 07:27 PM   #307
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goriders View Post
My preference in 2 years:

Gaudreau - McDavid - Poirier
Ferland - Monahan - Colborne
Wolf - Bennett - Bouma

Bigger, faster and more skill. A lot of toughness too intermixed. One or two guys on each line. Not 100% sure on Ferland, but hopeful. Also took Wolf as a dark horse.

Doubt we get McDavid though. We're not Oilers bad and we're going to get better.
Who's the next #1 pick we would get after icing a team like that?? That really looks like a 30th place team...
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2014, 07:37 PM   #308
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
Reinhart has incredible IQ with the puck. Hangs on to the last second to make plays, can make plays out of nothing. Has a decent amount of flash, don't know which Reinhart you've been watching. Maybe a bit on the slow side, but thinks the play way ahead of the defenders trying to take the puck off him. Doesn't have a great defensive game, at least not when compared to players like Bennett. Uses his smarts more than his physical strength.

Monahan has great IQ without the puck. And he uses his body and strength well to get to the net when the puck is on his stick, but he doesn't have amazing playmaking skills and can't exactly dangle his way through the offensive zone. Has very little flash, but is effective because he gets himself in the right place at the right time to finish plays with little effort, which is still very impressive. Because of his positional smarts, he already has a pretty strong defensive game.

Other than them both being not the fastest skaters, there are certainly differences.
Actually Monahan's playmaking was his most often mentioned attribute in scouting reports last year. I think he didn't show it this year mostly due to linemates and comfort level.

I'll copy ISS and Redline's reports on Monahan if you'd like. Rated aa the second best playmaker last draft behind Drouin by both this publications iirc.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 08:08 PM   #309
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Did somebody seriously say they'd take Ritchie over Reinhart???

This Ritchie hype is out of control.
Ashasx is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2014, 08:22 PM   #310
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Did somebody seriously say they'd take Ritchie over Reinhart???

This Ritchie hype is out of control.
The thing is, there's not much difference between taking Ritchie over Reinhart or taking Ritchie over Draisaitl.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 08:27 PM   #311
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
The thing is, there's not much difference between taking Ritchie over Reinhart or taking Ritchie over Draisaitl.
Both are ludicrous.
Ashasx is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2014, 08:29 PM   #312
PeteLFan
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Lol at Boomer he's a nobody just like last year saying Raymond signed then crying like a baby when being called out.

He should be canned he's terrible
PeteLFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PeteLFan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2014, 08:34 PM   #313
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Both are ludicrous.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion I guess.
__________________
Wolfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 08:37 PM   #314
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

No, there is literally no objective standard you can use to justify taking Ritchie over Reinhart or Draisaitl.
Ashasx is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 08:45 PM   #315
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
No, there is literally no objective standard you can use to justify taking Ritchie over Reinhart or Draisaitl.
What's your's for taking those two over Ritchie?
__________________
Wolfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 08:49 PM   #316
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman View Post
What's your's for taking those two over Ritchie?
Well, ignoring the immensely better offensive numbers, Reinhart is a much better two-way player. He dominated 5 on 5 which is a strong predictor for NHL success.

Draisaitl carried his team on his back with minimal help from any other forwards. He put up more assists than Ritchie had points.

Add to that, both play centre.

Plus, Ritchie's twitter handle is @ritchboiii.

Last edited by Ashasx; 06-26-2014 at 08:59 PM.
Ashasx is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2014, 08:55 PM   #317
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

I can see your argument, is it an absolute that the pick has to be a centre though?

Ritchie did have 39 goals in 61 games. Plays a style of game that the Flames are looking for in players going forward with the new management. Maybe Flames can grab another pick in the top 10 and draft two out of the three?
__________________
Wolfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 08:56 PM   #318
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

The freak out of taking Ritchie needs to end. Didn't somebody say that the Flames didn't meet with him much? I think they know he's not worth the risk. Besides the final decision should be up to Treliving.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 08:57 PM   #319
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman View Post
I can see your argument, is it an absolute that the pick has to be a centre though?

Ritchie did have 39 goals in 61 games. Plays a style of game that the Flames are looking for in players going forward with the new management. Maybe Flames can grab another pick in the top 10 and draft two out of the three?
Draisaitl had 38 goals in just 3 more games, yet everyone keeps thinking he's a pass only guy.

He nearly beat Ritchie at his own game while lapping him in assists with worse linemates.
Ashasx is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2014, 09:08 PM   #320
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
The freak out of taking Ritchie needs to end. Didn't somebody say that the Flames didn't meet with him much? I think they know he's not worth the risk. Besides the final decision should be up to Treliving.
After listening to Tod Button on the fan 960 a few minutes ago, He places Ritchie with Nylander, Kapanen, Dal Colle. It's still hazey and unclear as to who their top 6 is but I think Nylander or Kapanen is certainly one of them.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy