Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-18-2014, 10:59 AM   #121
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
well use your brain, people get all hyped up about the draft...honestly how many players are going to be "equal or better than Mackinnon"

one probably, Maybe two but probably not...Chances of the Flames picking #1 are SLIM
Well Mcdavid and Eichel are definitely projected to be. And were not arguing who's gonna be better than Mackinnon it's who will be better than O'Reilly and the top 5-6 next year definitely have the potential to be.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 11:01 AM   #122
Read Only
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M. View Post
And William Nylander was the projected number one heading into this year's draft. Players often look better in the year before they are drafted. Just sayin'.
Sure but Nylander but was looked at as number 1 in a weak draft class with no clear number 1 which isn't the case with the 2015 guys. There were as many if not more that had Ekblad as number 1. Nylander falling back isn't surprising because he wasn't ever regarded as being a elite level prospect like the 3 guys in the 2015 draft.

McDavid, Eichel and Hanafin have been projected elite guys for a couple of years now and haven't done anything to change that.

I guess they could all fall off but that seems unlikely.
Read Only is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 11:01 AM   #123
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M. View Post
And William Nylander was the projected number one heading into this year's draft. Players often look better in the year before they are drafted. Just sayin'.
There were no clear stand outs this year. In years with Crosby, Ovechkin, Malkin, Stamkos, Tavares, Etc you knew ahead of time and it's pretty safe to assume next year will be the same with Mcdavid and Eichel.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 01:39 PM   #124
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Adrian Dater @adater
Sakic on O'Reily talks: "We just have a different point of view on where the starting point is"

Adrian Dater @adater
Sakic: "His agent, Pat, seems to think he signed a one-year, $6.5 million deal and forgot about the $3.5 million first year" - boom
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2014, 01:46 PM   #125
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Sounds like O'Reilly is asking for more than 6.5 per.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 01:52 PM   #126
Jiggy
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Adrian Dater @adater
Sakic on O'Reily talks: "We just have a different point of view on where the starting point is"

Adrian Dater @adater
Sakic: "His agent, Pat, seems to think he signed a one-year, $6.5 million deal and forgot about the $3.5 million first year" - boom
Funny how retired players in management see things differently now. Sakic seems like he's picking it up quick.
Jiggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 05:04 PM   #127
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Well it's his job. The team and his bosses come first and overpaying for a player only benefits the player.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 05:19 PM   #128
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiggy View Post
Funny how retired players in management see things differently now. Sakic seems like he's picking it up quick.
IIRC Sakic was pretty reasonable in only going for one year contracts near the end of his career. Most want a multiyear contract.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 06:14 PM   #129
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
IIRC Sakic was pretty reasonable in only going for one year contracts near the end of his career. Most want a multiyear contract.
He was 32 when he signed a 5 year deal worth 36+ million. At 37 he signed a one year deal worth 5.75m which turned into a bargain when he scored 100 pts. But he stuck them with 6.75m and 6.0m demands the next 2 years because of it.

Joe Sakic was never reasonable when it came to money, remember he also signed one of the most significant offer sheets in history as well.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 06:32 PM   #130
saXon
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

I would love it if the Flames were paying 6 mil to a 100 point scorer.

Cammy earned 6 mil + and he was never anywhere near 100 points.
__________________

saXon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to saXon For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2014, 12:18 AM   #131
kehatch
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

I don't understand what Colorado is doing. They nickle and dime the guy two seasons ago opening things up for an offer sheet. They pay Varlamov close to 6 million. Now they refuse to qualify O'Reilly and instead go to team elected arbitration and start trash talking in the media.

I get they want their core under 6 million. But they screwed that up when they left him open to an offer sheet. Maybe if they weren't paying Berra 1.5 million a season...
kehatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 07:27 AM   #132
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M. View Post
And William Nylander was the projected number one heading into this year's draft. Players often look better in the year before they are drafted. Just sayin'.
McDavid is a different beast - he's been projected number 1 in his draft year for the last 3 years.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 08:15 AM   #133
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saXon View Post
I would love it if the Flames were paying 6 mil to a 100 point scorer.

Cammy earned 6 mil + and he was never anywhere near 100 points.
Scoring league wide has fallen off dramatically since then. In 06-07, 28 guys scored 80+ points, last year 7 did.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 08:42 AM   #134
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch View Post
I don't understand what Colorado is doing. They nickle and dime the guy two seasons ago opening things up for an offer sheet. They pay Varlamov close to 6 million. Now they refuse to qualify O'Reilly and instead go to team elected arbitration and start trash talking in the media.

I get they want their core under 6 million. But they screwed that up when they left him open to an offer sheet. Maybe if they weren't paying Berra 1.5 million a season...
Well during that time Colorado did become under "new management" with Sakic and Roy having entering the picture.

Regardless, do you think O'Reilly is worth $6.5M? This is absolutely the right move for Colorado as they either negotiate a new deal with O'Reilly or they have a chance to keep him for less than what they paid for him last season.

And it's also a different situation with Varlamov. Colorado is buying UFA years with Varlamov's contract, not so with O'Reilly. Apparently, Colorado's offer for O'Reilly was a 2 year contract for $3.5M each or 5 year contract for about the same amount. Not sure if that can be classified as nickel and diming given that was O'Reilly was unproven two seasons ago and was on his second contract.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FAN For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2014, 03:36 PM   #135
LGA
Powerplay Quarterback
 
LGA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch View Post
I don't understand what Colorado is doing. They nickle and dime the guy two seasons ago opening things up for an offer sheet. They pay Varlamov close to 6 million. Now they refuse to qualify O'Reilly and instead go to team elected arbitration and start trash talking in the media.

I get they want their core under 6 million. But they screwed that up when they left him open to an offer sheet. Maybe if they weren't paying Berra 1.5 million a season...
Colorado firmly believes that the starting point for negotiations shouldn't be 6.5 million a year. By taking him to arbitration, that takes some of the power out of the hands of O'Reilly's agent. They also remove the threat of a holdout, as there will be a set point at which he'll have a contract.

For me, this is a smart move by a club that doesn't want to be held hostage by one of the more ruthless agencies out there (Newport). They have a history of getting their clients to hold out for as much money as possible.
LGA is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LGA For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2014, 03:45 PM   #136
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LGA View Post
Colorado firmly believes that the starting point for negotiations shouldn't be 6.5 million a year. By taking him to arbitration, that takes some of the power out of the hands of O'Reilly's agent. They also remove the threat of a holdout, as there will be a set point at which he'll have a contract.

For me, this is a smart move by a club that doesn't want to be held hostage by one of the more ruthless agencies out there (Newport). They have a history of getting their clients to hold out for as much money as possible.
$6.5 million shouldn't be the starting point for ROR. That number is artificially raised due to an offersheet and offersheets by their very nature are overpayments.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 04:05 PM   #137
Husky
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
$6.5 million shouldn't be the starting point for ROR. That number is artificially raised due to an offersheet and offersheets by their very nature are overpayments.
1st on his team in goals for the season.
3rd in points
Plus a ton of intangibles (character, leadership, etc)

The guy is worth $6-6.5 million a season. The Avs are a much worse off team without a guy like RoR on the team. He does everything.
Husky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 04:22 PM   #138
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The lowest he can get in arbitration is $5.525M for a year (85% of his last year's salary), so he really has no incentive to sign for less.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 05:11 PM   #139
kehatch
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LGA View Post
Colorado firmly believes that the starting point for negotiations shouldn't be 6.5 million a year. By taking him to arbitration, that takes some of the power out of the hands of O'Reilly's agent. They also remove the threat of a holdout, as there will be a set point at which he'll have a contract.

For me, this is a smart move by a club that doesn't want to be held hostage by one of the more ruthless agencies out there (Newport). They have a history of getting their clients to hold out for as much money as possible.
Then they shouldn't have let it go to an offer sheet in the first place. We will see how this turns out. But right now I don't see to many scenarios where they get to sign the player long term to a salary they like. The entire sequence is incompetent.
kehatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 05:20 PM   #140
irrevocable
Scoring Winger
 
irrevocable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 17th Ave :D
Exp:
Default

He deserves, in this market, around 6 mil a season. He's tenacious, feisty, and has a scoring touch. This guy isn't a one trick pony, he actually excels at both ends of the rink -- which is a rare commodity, for his age anyway.

I fantasize about him joining the Flames for an average salary of 6.2 mil a season.

Oy, we can dream.
irrevocable is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy