03-26-2014, 10:25 AM
|
#421
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Two of the stupidest things, in my opinion, that came out of the owners meetings.
1. Permit a coach to challenge any official’s decision, except scoring plays which are automatically reviewed. FAILED
I don't get there, there's pages and pages on what can/can't be reviewed in regular game play. If the NFL is serious about getting the calls right, let a coach challenge anything, if they are willing to part with a timeout. I can see this idea gaining enough traction to get passed in the coming years.
2. Modify pass interference so that it can be called within one yard of the line of scrimmage. TABLED
Am I reading this right? If this was passed, it would essentially destroy bump and run coverage, since PI could be called within 1 yard instead of 5 yards?
|
|
|
03-26-2014, 01:35 PM
|
#422
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagal4321
2. Modify pass interference so that it can be called within one yard of the line of scrimmage. TABLED
Am I reading this right? If this was passed, it would essentially destroy bump and run coverage, since PI could be called within 1 yard instead of 5 yards?
|
If so, welcome to the National WR Screen League.
|
|
|
03-26-2014, 04:46 PM
|
#423
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
If so, welcome to the National WR Screen League.
|
Goodell is envisioning a league where every game has scores of 50+ points. Points do not equal entertainment!
Eventually no kids growing up are going to want to play defense because they are eliminating every rule that gives defense a chance. The rules are already heavily slanted to the O.
I would love to see them allow MORE contact by DBs on receivers
EDIT: The most important rule that needs to be changed is roughing the passer. Give the QB the same protection any other player gets
|
|
|
03-26-2014, 10:11 PM
|
#424
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, OR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by M*A*S*H 4077
EDIT: The most important rule that needs to be changed is roughing the passer. Give the QB the same protection any other player gets
|
I much prefer a defensive game, I hate the commissioner with the fire of a thousand suns, but I have to disagree with this. The rules protecting the QB may be a bit extreme, but you do have to protect them a little more. No one wants to see a prime time matchup of Chase Daniel vs. Brock Osweiler (sorry, Dis).
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 07:50 AM
|
#425
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montana Moe
I much prefer a defensive game, I hate the commissioner with the fire of a thousand suns, but I have to disagree with this. The rules protecting the QB may be a bit extreme, but you do have to protect them a little more. No one wants to see a prime time matchup of Chase Daniel vs. Brock Osweiler (sorry, Dis).
|
At least not yet! Maybe in a couple of years that would be a good matchup!
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 09:17 AM
|
#426
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Calgary North of 'Merica
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by M*A*S*H 4077
Goodell is envisioning a league where every game has scores of 50+ points. Points do not equal entertainment!
Eventually no kids growing up are going to want to play defense because they are eliminating every rule that gives defense a chance. The rules are already heavily slanted to the O.
I would love to see them allow MORE contact by DBs on receivers
EDIT: The most important rule that needs to be changed is roughing the passer. Give the QB the same protection any other player gets
|
This
By creating more opportunities for PI you are going to ruin a game that features great battles and athleticism. Every play is going to be a pass play trying for the PI.
__________________
Thanks to Halifax Drunk for the sweet Avatar
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 09:48 AM
|
#427
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
PI should be a 15 yard penalty.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-27-2014, 10:58 AM
|
#428
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by return to the red
This
By creating more opportunities for PI you are going to ruin a game that features great battles and athleticism. Every play is going to be a pass play trying for the PI.
|
It is already a joke when the play is over, no flag was thrown, the receiver starts making a throwing the flag gesture and out it comes late because the receiver called for it. I think they should pass a rule that if a receiver makes a throwing a flag gesture his team should be penalized.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-27-2014, 11:28 AM
|
#429
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
It is already a joke when the play is over, no flag was thrown, the receiver starts making a throwing the flag gesture and out it comes late because the receiver called for it. I think they should pass a rule that if a receiver makes a throwing a flag gesture his team should be penalized.
|
I'm sorry but players whining to the refs happens in every sport, so not entirely sure where you're going with this.
Hockey players all throw their hands in the air when they think there's a delay of game penalty, both actions shouldn't have an impact on the refs decisions.
|
|
|
03-27-2014, 12:39 PM
|
#430
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Calgary North of 'Merica
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
It is already a joke when the play is over, no flag was thrown, the receiver starts making a throwing the flag gesture and out it comes late because the receiver called for it. I think they should pass a rule that if a receiver makes a throwing a flag gesture his team should be penalized.
|
or after they throw it the "yep I know it's PI, I called that, you know that" nodding head of approval.
I understand it's a fast game and the element of human judgement is going to come into play but what attracted to me to the NFL over the CFL was the fact that every pass downfield didn't result in a huge overthrow or a PI call. Let the players play to some extent
__________________
Thanks to Halifax Drunk for the sweet Avatar
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to return to the red For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-27-2014, 01:57 PM
|
#431
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by return to the red
This
By creating more opportunities for PI you are going to ruin a game that features great battles and athleticism. Every play is going to be a pass play trying for the PI.
|
I watch football to see Calvin Johnson out muscle 3 defenders in the endzone to make the catch. I don't watch football to watch some guy make a catch because no one can touch him.
If this rule eventually comes to pass I hope they are just as hard on receivers and call them anytime they touch a defender. But by that point we may as well play two hand touch.
|
|
|
03-28-2014, 10:50 AM
|
#432
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Looks like the Eagles are cutting DeSean today. Hope the chargers sign him
|
|
|
03-28-2014, 10:52 AM
|
#433
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary,AB
|
DeSean Jackson has been released by the Eagles.
|
|
|
03-28-2014, 11:02 AM
|
#434
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sadly not in the Dome.
|
I guess they have some real big concerns with his off field behavior and his association with the Crips. Eagles have been doing extensive checking into his background and circle of friends.
Never a huge DeSean fan but he is definitely a talent and will land somewhere.
|
|
|
03-28-2014, 11:06 AM
|
#435
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
I'm a little concerned the Raiders may take a run at him seeing they have a lot of cap space to sign him to a big deal as he's one of those guys that won't take a discount and will be looking for the biggest deal he can get. His attitude and gang ties don't make for a great team player. When a guy of that talent at his age gets cut that's as big of a red flag as you will ever see.
|
|
|
03-28-2014, 11:14 AM
|
#436
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sadly not in the Dome.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
I'm a little concerned the Raiders may take a run at him seeing they have a lot of cap space to sign him to a big deal as he's one of those guys that won't take a discount and will be looking for the biggest deal he can get. His attitude and gang ties don't make for a great team player. When a guy of that talent at his age gets cut that's as big of a red flag as you will ever see.
|
Great talent, right age and seemingly a perfect fit for the system he was in? Major red flag. He'll cash in somewhere though but I would be leery.
|
|
|
03-28-2014, 11:25 AM
|
#437
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galakanokis
Great talent, right age and seemingly a perfect fit for the system he was in? Major red flag. He'll cash in somewhere though but I would be leery.
|
I think he's going to be disappointed in the guaranteed money he get's offered from teams. After the Hernandez debacle I think teams will be leery of guys like this and I imagine at least half the league won't even consider bringing him in.
|
|
|
03-28-2014, 11:25 AM
|
#438
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Sounds like Johnny Football impressed, can anyone clarify this in terms of they saw or heard?
|
|
|
03-28-2014, 11:29 AM
|
#439
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sadly not in the Dome.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
I think he's going to be disappointed in the guaranteed money he get's offered from teams. After the Hernandez debacle I think teams will be leery of guys like this and I imagine at least half the league won't even consider bringing him in.
|
Agreed. I don't believe he sees the money that the Eagles were willing to pay him. There's a tweet out there from a teammate about it being and unpopular decision but great for the direction of the team. Something like that. Very telling if you take it to mean what I think it means.
|
|
|
03-28-2014, 11:34 AM
|
#440
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burke Salad
Sounds like Johnny Football impressed, can anyone clarify this in terms of they saw or heard?
|
Depending on who you listened to he either had the outright best pro day of all QB's or he was tied with Bortles for best pro day. Pro days are scripted to players strengths and teams know that and don't put as much stock into it as they do actual game tape. Remember Mike Maylock said Jamarcus Russell had the best pro day he's ever seen.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:48 PM.
|
|