Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-19-2014, 11:17 AM   #821
KelVarnsen
Franchise Player
 
KelVarnsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Apartment 5A
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ark2 View Post
What is your aviation background?
Ex flight dispatcher, AVgeek and general student of aviation. I was just stating my opinion of a theory.
KelVarnsen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KelVarnsen For This Useful Post:
Old 03-19-2014, 11:19 AM   #822
Ark2
Franchise Player
 
Ark2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KelVarnsen View Post
Ex flight dispatcher, AVgeek and general student of aviation. I was just stating my opinion of a theory.
Thanks. Just trying to understand if the fire theory is plausible as to a layman like myself, it seems to be the most likely.
Ark2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 11:25 AM   #823
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

I don't think you can separately disconnect the oxygen supply giving the pilots oxygen, but not the passengers. As the reason you stated, oxygen fueling the fire, was stated as a reason the pilots wouldn't have used the masks.

What if the fire started in or near the cockpit. That would make it even worse, no? If the pilots are forced out due to smoke or heat, or the electronics fail quickly...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042 View Post
OK, my turn for a "dumb question."

Let's say there was a fire onboard. Would the following make any sense:

- Descend to 24,000 feet.
- Pilots put on oxygen masks
- Pilots disengage the passenger mask oxygen flow. (You'll see why in a moment.)
- Decompress the cabin to attempt to control the fire. (Like in the Val Kilmer Mars movie.) The reason to disengage the passenger oxygen is to not provide oxygen for the fire.
- Turns out the pilots shut off all oxygen including their own; leading them to suffer from hypoxia.
- Autopilot flies the plane on last course until fuel runs out.

Even remotely possible?
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 11:41 AM   #824
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

This is so similar to the Stephen King Short Story the Langoliers.
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 12:01 PM   #825
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Clearly we need a way to open doors midflight and parachutes ... #GreenTxt
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 12:15 PM   #826
Regulator75
Franchise Player
 
Regulator75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
Exp:
Default

I know it's probably been brought up before...

But, every single person on that flight probably had a cellphone.
Even in the most perilous situations, at least one of the 239 people would have been able to get an emergency text or call to someone.

Even the plane was hijacked and they collected the communication devices, no way they could get them all before someone called out.

Section of plane is on fire, someone calls a loved one.

I think back to 9/11 and all the calls made then, fast forward 13 years and even more people have a mobile device.

Unless the plane was struck by a missile or exploded without warning into a million pieces, it's mindbottling how there's no known calls.
__________________

More photos on Flickr
Regulator75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 12:21 PM   #827
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

I sense a movie about this will surface a couple years down the road..
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 12:22 PM   #828
kermitology
It's not easy being green!
 
kermitology's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulator75 View Post
I know it's probably been brought up before...

But, every single person on that flight probably had a cellphone.
Even in the most perilous situations, at least one of the 239 people would have been able to get an emergency text or call to someone.

Even the plane was hijacked and they collected the communication devices, no way they could get them all before someone called out.

Section of plane is on fire, someone calls a loved one.

I think back to 9/11 and all the calls made then, fast forward 13 years and even more people have a mobile device.

Unless the plane was struck by a missile or exploded without warning into a million pieces, it's mindbottling how there's no known calls.
You would have little to no signal at altitude over the ocean. Cell phone tower antenna gain pattern presents a shaped signal that doesn't direct/accept much energy vertically.
__________________
Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
kermitology is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to kermitology For This Useful Post:
Old 03-19-2014, 12:40 PM   #829
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulator75 View Post
I know it's probably been brought up before...

But, every single person on that flight probably had a cellphone.
Even in the most perilous situations, at least one of the 239 people would have been able to get an emergency text or call to someone.

Even the plane was hijacked and they collected the communication devices, no way they could get them all before someone called out.

Section of plane is on fire, someone calls a loved one.

I think back to 9/11 and all the calls made then, fast forward 13 years and even more people have a mobile device.

Unless the plane was struck by a missile or exploded without warning into a million pieces, it's mindbottling how there's no known calls.
there's a grave assumption there that even one person on the plane owned a satellite phone.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 12:50 PM   #830
AndyL
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon View Post
I don't think you can separately disconnect the oxygen supply giving the pilots oxygen, but not the passengers. As the reason you stated, oxygen fueling the fire, was stated as a reason the pilots wouldn't have used the masks.

What if the fire started in or near the cockpit. That would make it even worse, no? If the pilots are forced out due to smoke or heat, or the electronics fail quickly...
Ok, but flight crew has separate oxygen... Bottled oxygen in the 777 flight deck for crew - not the same systems used for passengers. And they'd go on o2 - fire or not - to ensure they stay conscious... For just that reason - no good to anyone dead.

And if the fire was in the cockpit - plane would have splashed long before - about when the autopilot went melty... Not 6 hours later... 777 is fly by wire; computers go - so does airplane.
AndyL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 01:26 PM   #831
Playfair
Scoring Winger
 
Playfair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Probably a data but the Malaysians have radar information they don't want to talk about it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...y-reasons.html
Playfair is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Playfair For This Useful Post:
Old 03-19-2014, 01:29 PM   #832
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Playfair View Post
Probably a data but the Malaysians have radar information they don't want to talk about it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...y-reasons.html

I havn't read the article yet (I will) but I would like it better if it was a better source (yes I know you can't control that).
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 05:25 PM   #833
KelVarnsen
Franchise Player
 
KelVarnsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Apartment 5A
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ark2 View Post
Thanks. Just trying to understand if the fire theory is plausible as to a layman like myself, it seems to be the most likely.
It is a actually a good theory, but like I said a fire that causes the damage he suggested who likely end up with the aircraft being destroyed by the fire.

I doubt we will ever know what happened.
KelVarnsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 05:31 PM   #834
Acey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

US Navy heading out to look for MH370.

Acey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 06:13 PM   #835
OldDutch
#1 Goaltender
 
OldDutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulator75 View Post
I know it's probably been brought up before...

But, every single person on that flight probably had a cellphone.
Even in the most perilous situations, at least one of the 239 people would have been able to get an emergency text or call to someone.

Even the plane was hijacked and they collected the communication devices, no way they could get them all before someone called out.

Section of plane is on fire, someone calls a loved one.

I think back to 9/11 and all the calls made then, fast forward 13 years and even more people have a mobile device.

Unless the plane was struck by a missile or exploded without warning into a million pieces, it's mindbottling how there's no known calls.
Explanation on exactly this and why not in detail: http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_te..._for_help.html
OldDutch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OldDutch For This Useful Post:
Old 03-19-2014, 08:56 PM   #836
oilyfan
Powerplay Quarterback
 
oilyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SE Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ark2 View Post
Thanks. Just trying to understand if the fire theory is plausible as to a layman like myself, it seems to be the most likely.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-0...-airliner.html

Quote:
The fire theory runs counter to the evidence so far, three people familiar with U.S. investigators’ analysis said. They asked not to be identified because they aren’t authorized to speak about the probe.

Critical electrical systems stopped functioning in a way that suggests they were switched off, rather than failing as they would have in a fire, the people said.

Airline crashes due to fires occur less than 20 minutes on average after blazes break out, while satellite transmissions show Flight 370 was operating for as many as seven hours, said John Cox, a Washington-based aviation safety consultant who co-wrote a 2013 U.K. Royal Aeronautical Society report on aircraft fires.
oilyfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 08:58 PM   #837
edslunch
Franchise Player
 
edslunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother View Post
I havn't read the article yet (I will) but I would like it better if it was a better source (yes I know you can't control that).

You discount the Daily Mail just because today's headline is "A mother's infidelity and the lie that left her son without a father"???
edslunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 09:05 PM   #838
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

My guess is it crashed in a remote mountain somewhere which is why debris was never found. Sadly unless those blackboxes are found, we'll never know what occurred.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 09:15 PM   #839
jschick88
Franchise Player
 
jschick88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The Associated Press ‏@AP 1m
BREAKING: Australian PM: 2 objects in search for Malaysian jet may have been found.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29 View Post
Dude when it comes to the Canucks, it could be a team of Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot, Augusto Pinochet, Josef Stalin and Kim Jong Il and if one of them scores against the Canucks you take it.
jschick88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 09:23 PM   #840
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

haha, that's nice and vague.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy