|
View Poll Results: Pick your top five selection list
|
|
Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Bennett-Dal Colle
|
   
|
44 |
8.21% |
|
Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Bennett
|
  
|
7 |
1.31% |
|
Ekblad-Reinhart-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle
|
  
|
118 |
22.01% |
|
Ekblad-Reinhart-Bennett-Dal Colle-Draisaitl
|
  
|
56 |
10.45% |
|
Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Bennett-Dal Colle
|
  
|
7 |
1.31% |
|
Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle-Bennett
|
  
|
4 |
0.75% |
|
Ekblad-Bennett-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle
|
|
21 |
3.92% |
|
Ekblad-Bennett-Reinhart-Dal Colle-Draisaitl
|
|
10 |
1.87% |
|
Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle
|
|
22 |
4.10% |
|
Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Reinhart
|
|
4 |
0.75% |
|
Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Bennett-Dal Colle
|
|
27 |
5.04% |
|
Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Bennett
|
|
9 |
1.68% |
|
Reinhart-Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle
|
|
85 |
15.86% |
|
Reinhart-Ekblad-Bennett-Dal Colle-Draisaitl
|
|
41 |
7.65% |
|
Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl-Bennett
|
|
4 |
0.75% |
|
Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Bennett-Draisaitl
|
|
2 |
0.37% |
|
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Bennett-Dal Colle
|
|
2 |
0.37% |
|
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Bennett-Ekblad-Dal Colle
|
|
1 |
0.19% |
|
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Ekblad-Bennett
|
|
2 |
0.37% |
|
Reinhart-Bennett-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle
|
|
19 |
3.54% |
|
Reinhart-Bennett-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl
|
|
8 |
1.49% |
|
Reinhart-Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle
|
|
9 |
1.68% |
|
Bennett-Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle
|
|
12 |
2.24% |
|
Bennett-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle
|
|
2 |
0.37% |
|
Bennett-Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle
|
|
5 |
0.93% |
|
Bennett-Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl
|
|
6 |
1.12% |
|
Bennett-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle
|
|
4 |
0.75% |
|
Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Reinhart-Dal Colle
|
|
1 |
0.19% |
|
Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Reinhart
|
|
1 |
0.19% |
|
Bennett-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle
|
|
3 |
0.56% |
 |
|
03-17-2014, 09:48 AM
|
#1701
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
I wish Burke would just get it over with and name Conroy GM now.
|
I wish Burke would just get it over with and do up his tie.
|
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Sidney Crosby's Hat For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 09:50 AM
|
#1702
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Just don't wear a tie. It's ok, we all know they suck and no one is going to judge you for not wearing it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 09:54 AM
|
#1703
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I'm guessing Burke was at the game to see just how good Ekblad really is and if he's worth giving up whatever it'll take to land him.
My prediction is that he is. The Flames will either end up winning the draft lottery or will make a trade for the first overall pick and draft Ekblad.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 10:00 AM
|
#1704
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch
I am always very cautious in my projections. Centre is one of the most important positions in the game. There are 20 or so top players at the position. There are usually only a couple in every draft. Last draft Mackinnon is the only player I had projected as a top C.
If you expand the definition to a player that could play on a top line on some teams than I would project Reinhart at that level. But in my opinion we are trying to build a cup team.
That said, Reinhart (and Monahan) could exceed my expectations. None of us get paid to do this, and those that do are just making a slightly more educated guess!
|
It seems to me that what you might consider to be a 1st line C, others would call elite. I think there are only a handful of elite C in the entire league.
I would think that Monahan and Reinhart both project to solid 1st line C.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 11:07 AM
|
#1705
|
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
2 - Edmonton - 57pts - 13GR
3 - Florida - 58pts - 14GR
4 - New York - 61pts - 13GR
5 - Calgary - 61pts - 14GR
6 - Carolina - 67pts - 14GR
7 - Nashville - 68pts - 14GR
Brought Nashville back in.
No relevant games today. Tomorrow:
MIN @ NYI
CAR @ CLB
BUF @ CGY
NSH @ EDM - win/win for us... hopefully an Oilers win in OT
FLA @ SJ
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 12:36 PM
|
#1706
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
I'm guessing Burke was at the game to see just how good Ekblad really is and if he's worth giving up whatever it'll take to land him.
My prediction is that he is. The Flames will either end up winning the draft lottery or will make a trade for the first overall pick and draft Ekblad.
|
I do believe Burke will try to get Ekblad one way or another knowing how he covets big defensemen.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 12:38 PM
|
#1707
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Moving up will likely cost Gaudreau.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 12:40 PM
|
#1708
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
Moving up will likely cost Gaudreau.
|
I'd probably be okay with that. We'll be trading a position of strength but if Buffalo has the 1st, they already have some small forwards.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 12:41 PM
|
#1709
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
Moving up will likely cost Gaudreau.
|
Then it's not worth it.
He could very well be better than any of the top 5 forwards this draft.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 12:45 PM
|
#1710
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames
Then it's not worth it.
He could very well be better than any of the top 5 forwards this draft.
|
How about Sven?
Sven + Dal Colle for Ekblad. I think I would do it.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 12:50 PM
|
#1711
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
|
Gaudreau + our pick for the 1st overall I'd do in a heart beat.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to $ven27 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 12:53 PM
|
#1712
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Yeah I'd do our pick + Gaudreau for the 1st overall this year no problem. I'd be more comfortable with that that 1st + Sven for sure.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 12:54 PM
|
#1713
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourque's Twin
How about Sven?
Sven + Dal Colle for Ekblad. I think I would do it.
|
Sven I would consider. But it would still be a difficult move to make, as his potential has not been fully realized, and won't be for a few years I don't think. He was more of a project than we thought when we saw him come up and score a few goals during his 94 point WHL season.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 12:54 PM
|
#1714
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
If the Flames end up in the 3rd or 4th spot there is no reason whatsoever the Flames should be using as asset like Gaudreau to move up. If they're in 5th-6th okay sure but the gap between a guy you'll get at 3rd from 1st isn't worth it at all.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 12:59 PM
|
#1715
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
If the Flames end up in the 3rd or 4th spot there is no reason whatsoever the Flames should be using as asset like Gaudreau to move up. If they're in 5th-6th okay sure but the gap between a guy you'll get at 3rd from 1st isn't worth it at all.
|
No, in 3 or 4 you don't add Gaudreau, you take Bennett/Reinhart/Draisaitl.
I think 5/6 is where we end up, likely 5 at this point.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 01:06 PM
|
#1716
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I'd offer our second and a prospect that isn't Johnny, Sven or Poirier to move from 5th/6th to (say) 3rd, though. I'd like to have our pick of the top center prospects after Reinhart.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 01:13 PM
|
#1717
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I propose we offer our 1st + Klimchuk + 2nd or something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to H2SO4(aq) For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 02:12 PM
|
#1718
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lethbridge
|
Gaudreau might be as good as any of these kids. I don't see him as a throw-in to move up a few spots.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to automaton 3 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 02:57 PM
|
#1719
|
|
Draft Pick
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Probably at the Saddledome
|
I don't think it's a bad thing if Reinhart falls into our lap. From what I've seen from Monahan I think he could turn into a great #2C. That's not a knock on him at all, alot of teams in the NHL lack a number 2 centreman who are as gifted as Monahan offensively.
And if we get Ekblad, Bennet, Dal Colle or Draisaitl they immediatly become our best prospect. I don't think there is a lot of losing to be done for us in this draft.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 03:32 PM
|
#1720
|
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
If the team lands in the 5 or 6 slot I'd rather see what it would take to move to 4. I just don't think there's that much of a difference between 1 and 4 and why burn off the assets required to go to 1 if you can get something pretty close to just as good at 4.
Last edited by Parallex; 03-17-2014 at 03:41 PM.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 PM.
|
|
