|
View Poll Results: What will Burke get done by Wednesday? (pick one or multiple)
|
|
trade Cammalleri
|
   
|
244 |
80.26% |
|
trade Stempniak
|
  
|
185 |
60.86% |
|
trade Butler
|
  
|
120 |
39.47% |
|
hockey trade (Hudler)
|
  
|
49 |
16.12% |
|
hockey trade (Glencross)
|
  
|
53 |
17.43% |
|
hockey trade (Wideman)
|
  
|
72 |
23.68% |
|
acquire Meyers
|
|
27 |
8.88% |
|
none of the above (quiet deadline)
|
|
33 |
10.86% |
03-01-2014, 01:41 PM
|
#41
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
Why is Meyers being singled out? Is there a legitimate rumour that has the Flames being interested?
|
People are obsessed with big defencemen, despite Myers being no good.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 01:44 PM
|
#42
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I wouldn't say he isn't good, he may be over rated but he's still good with lots of potential. I just think he needs a change of scenery
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 01:46 PM
|
#43
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Rockies, West of the rest
|
The newest buzzphrase: "hockey trade".
I really hope Butler gets a one-way GTFO ticket, but then again I hoped the same for Stajan and he was re-signed, so...
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to hurtin_albertan For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 04:52 PM
|
#44
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
There's a gem by @NHLsourcessay.
NHLSourcesSay @NHLSourcesSay 2h
#Flames Matt Stajan getting interest around the league, teams like that he signed a new 4 year deal, that said so do flames #Canes linked
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 05:13 PM
|
#45
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
|
Nice, I wouldn't mind stajan traded at all!
Still want to give knight a chance.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 05:28 PM
|
#46
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nanaimo
|
Everyone saying Glencross will be moved is forgetting he has a NMC. Highly unlikely he would wave it. He's been on record before how much He loves being in Alberta close to home. I think management would have to buy him out or let his contract expire.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 05:32 PM
|
#47
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel
Everyone saying Glencross will be moved is forgetting he has a NMC. Highly unlikely he would wave it. He's been on record before how much He loves being in Alberta close to home. I think management would have to buy him out or let his contract expire.
|
I agree with you 100%. Thing is though, the team is doing just fine without him, and I think even he knows he's not going to be a part of the future long term. Add in the Omission of comments when asked about Glencross from Burke in his interview on TSN, one could easily be lead to believe something is afoot with Glencross.
I've been just as vocal about trade scenario's involving Glencross citing his NTC is the biggest block to him being traded. But I won't discount the possibility that there can be more to the situation behind closed doors that no one outside of the organization knows.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 05:34 PM
|
#48
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel
Everyone saying Glencross will be moved is forgetting he has a NMC. Highly unlikely he would wave it. He's been on record before how much He loves being in Alberta close to home. I think management would have to buy him out or let his contract expire.
|
No one is forgetting the NMC. And Burke has stated before that he believes in honouring them.
However, when players are asked if they will waive, the majority do. Factor in a team in a rebuild, and it is hard to think of any examples of players declining.
Besides, he can live here in the summer - it's not like he's doing any ranching during the season
Edit: for the record, I do not wish to see him traded (unless it is for over-payment)
Last edited by Enoch Root; 03-01-2014 at 05:37 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 05:35 PM
|
#49
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla
At the draft:
Sven Baertschi + Max Reinhart + David Jones + 2014 3rd round pick for Tyler Myers + Joel Armia + 2014 2nd round pick
|
Burke has never shown to be that stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 05:39 PM
|
#50
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nanaimo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
No one is forgetting the NMC. And Burke has stated before that he believes in honouring them.
However, when players are asked if they will waive, the majority do. Factor in a team in a rebuild, and it is hard to think of any examples of players declining.
Besides, he can live here in the summer - it's not like he's doing any ranching during the season
Edit: for the record, I do not wish to see him traded (unless it is for over-payment)
|
Mabey he does wave. It would have to be like the example capgeek gives of Brad Richards when he was traded to Tampa Bay. He only waved it if Tampa would continue to honor it.
Edit. He has only a year left on his contract. I would see next year being more likely.
Last edited by combustiblefuel; 03-01-2014 at 05:45 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 07:50 PM
|
#51
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
Any vet with 2 or less years needs to start looking at their next contract and how best they can leverage their next deal. I dint think many feel they can maximize that next deal playing on a bottom feeder. Take Cammy for example, I'd be the would gave preferred playing on a more talented team to increase his next contract. If I'm Glencross, I'd be open to it, even thought he still gas term left.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 08:43 PM
|
#52
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29
You know I think you may be onto something about Brodie, not sure why but I get a gut feeling he'll be moved.
|
Why would Burke trade a young defenseman who is improving every season and one of the top defenseman in this team? That doesn't make any sense at all.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to OzSome For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-01-2014, 11:58 PM
|
#53
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I really hope that Glencross is not traded this season. You would have to imagine his trade value is pretty low at the moment.
His contract is very modest for his production. I would imagine that if he gets back on track in the first third of the season, most teams will be able to absorb his cap-hit (even if the Flames have to absorb 50% to help).
Would have been better last season, and hopefully it will be better next season - but this season is probably not the best time to make that move.
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2014, 12:00 AM
|
#54
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fischy13
Any vet with 2 or less years needs to start looking at their next contract and how best they can leverage their next deal. I dint think many feel they can maximize that next deal playing on a bottom feeder. Take Cammy for example, I'd be the would gave preferred playing on a more talented team to increase his next contract. If I'm Glencross, I'd be open to it, even thought he still gas term left.
|
Your spelling is impressive and you make great points !
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2014, 12:05 AM
|
#55
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
I really hope that Glencross is not traded this season. You would have to imagine his trade value is pretty low at the moment.
His contract is very modest for his production. I would imagine that if he gets back on track in the first third of the season, most teams will be able to absorb his cap-hit (even if the Flames have to absorb 50% to help).
Would have been better last season, and hopefully it will be better next season - but this season is probably not the best time to make that move.
|
Agreed. Offseason would be best if anything to move him. This season is a wash for him and the team.
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2014, 11:03 AM
|
#56
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great
I think one of Wideman or Hudler will go, and I wouldn't be shocked if Glencross is also dealt. Realistically, the Flames will be able to replace Glencross with a player nearly 10 years his junior next year (Poirier) that will do most of the same things.
|
Lmao. I really don't think you understand the definition of realistic.
Poirier is a long shot to make the NHL at all next year. Thinking he can realistically be able to replace Glencross as a 19 year old rookie is beyond a long shot. The odds of Poirier replacing Glencross as a rookie are astronomically small.
That is unless your definition of replace is fill a spot in the lineup, play in a situation he won't be ready for and put up much smaller numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
03-05-2014, 01:41 PM
|
#57
|
|
Franchise Player
|
8.25% got it correct.
|
|
|
|
|
03-05-2014, 01:59 PM
|
#58
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
|
March 5th has been a big failure for Burke jmo. The Flames didn't come close to making the moves needed to fetch prospects or draft picks.
Very disappointed they failed today.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-05-2014, 02:01 PM
|
#59
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I really cant beleive the patience Burke has shown. Mind = Blown
|
|
|
|
|
03-05-2014, 02:12 PM
|
#60
|
|
Franchise Player
|
LOL at the people still voting after the fact. Deadline day is over people. Stop trying to look smart by voting now...
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:07 PM.
|
|
