Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2014, 12:31 PM   #281
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

So does great mean a chance to win a cup or does it mean staying in Calgary?
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 12:37 PM   #282
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

I think Cammalleri would be a good veteran to keep for the kids. Hopefully the terms and dollars make sense though. Maybe 3 years for $18 if he's okay without a raise? I don't think he'll get more than that as. UFA would he?
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 12:38 PM   #283
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'd much rather have 1st round pick + prospect + $6 million that we need to spend in UFA or through trade than keeping Cammalleri.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 12:40 PM   #284
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
I think Cammalleri would be a good veteran to keep for the kids. Hopefully the terms and dollars make sense though. Maybe 3 years for $18 if he's okay without a raise? I don't think he'll get more than that as. UFA would he?
If the Flames sign Cammalleri it is more than likely going to be an offer he cant refuse.

The Flames have money they need to spend and Cammalleri doesnt have to stay.

I fully expect that if Cammalleri re-signs in Calgary its going to be something like 1 or 2 years for somewhere $8M AAV.

And then they'll trade him at the deadline next season or something.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 12:41 PM   #285
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

I hope the discussion was as follows:

Burke: "We want to trade you at the deadline and then sign you in the offseason to a 4 year $4.5 million per contract to mentor our kids during the rebuild"

Cammalleri: "great"
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 01-29-2014, 12:44 PM   #286
Bend it like Bourgeois
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

I think he'll be looking for his last contract so I would guess in the $35-$40M range (total)

It might still be $6M a year but 3 years won't get it done. IMO
Bend it like Bourgeois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 12:47 PM   #287
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
If the Flames sign Cammalleri it is more than likely going to be an offer he cant refuse.

The Flames have money they need to spend and Cammalleri doesnt have to stay.

I fully expect that if Cammalleri re-signs in Calgary its going to be something like 1 or 2 years for somewhere $8M AAV.

And then they'll trade him at the deadline next season or something.
I don't think he gets a raise to be honest

Maybe during UFA season but not if he re-signs with the Flames.

I don't think he has done anything to warrant a raise
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to albertGQ For This Useful Post:
Old 01-29-2014, 12:50 PM   #288
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
I don't think he gets a raise to be honest

Maybe during UFA season but not if he re-signs with the Flames.

I don't think he has done anything to warrant a raise
Never said he did, but the Flames obviously want to keep him and are way, way off the Cap Floor, thats why I said 'money they need to spend.'

And they want to keep him under contract so that hes more valuable to trade later on and the Flames might swallow some of his salary in any trade to ramp his value up even more.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 12:51 PM   #289
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

I like Cammy. Wouldn't hate to have him stay here.

But I like Gaudreau more, and feel we need to accommodate him. And on a Burke team there can't be both a Cammy and a Gaudreau in the top 6. Something has to give.

You can't say we need to get bigger and more skilled, then just go and re-sign our smallest and most valuable asset for acquiring future skill. Just does not make sense.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 12:51 PM   #290
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Wasn't it already rumoured/reported that is he wants to stay in Calgary it would be less per year and the offer on the table is for less than his current salary?
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 01:17 PM   #291
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Well just by living in Alberta he effectively gets a raise of like 10% just because of the tax differences.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 02:26 PM   #292
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
So does great mean a chance to win a cup or does it mean staying in Calgary?
yes
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 01-29-2014, 02:28 PM   #293
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
If the Flames sign Cammalleri it is more than likely going to be an offer he cant refuse.

The Flames have money they need to spend and Cammalleri doesnt have to stay.

I fully expect that if Cammalleri re-signs in Calgary its going to be something like 1 or 2 years for somewhere $8M AAV.

And then they'll trade him at the deadline next season or something.
All the rumbling to date has been the exact opposite

It sounds like the Flames are offering a lower number than he (and most) think(s) he would get on the street
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 02:32 PM   #294
Goodlad
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Goodlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central CA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
I like Cammy. Wouldn't hate to have him stay here.

But I like Gaudreau more, and feel we need to accommodate him. And on a Burke team there can't be both a Cammy and a Gaudreau in the top 6. Something has to give.

You can't say we need to get bigger and more skilled, then just go and re-sign our smallest and most valuable asset for acquiring future skill. Just does not make sense.
What doesn't make sense is making roster decisions based around Johnny Gaudreau. He may or may not even play in the NHL. He might decide to stay on another year at BC. He could need a year or two in the AHL to adjust to an 82 game schedule, and playing against bigger/faster/stronger players. There are way too many unknowns with any of our prospects to factor them into decisions about the current roster.
Goodlad is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Goodlad For This Useful Post:
Old 01-29-2014, 02:45 PM   #295
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

No to Cammalleri.

You can not have your LW looking like:

Cammalleri 5'8''
Baertschi 5'10''
Gaudreau 5'7''

If Cammalleri gets signed, I would take that as meaning 1 or both of Gaudreau/Baertschi being traded soon. And given the current state of this team, that would be a shame.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Fonz For This Useful Post:
Old 01-29-2014, 02:54 PM   #296
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
I hope the discussion was as follows:

Burke: "We want to trade you at the deadline and then sign you in the offseason to a 4 year $4.5 million per contract to mentor our kids during the rebuild"

Cammalleri: "great"
We have coaches and other veterans for mentoring. Cammalleri would be stealing a roster spot, as the Fonz just mentioned, from one of our talented prospects. He is declining and IMO it's time to move on.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 03:08 PM   #297
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
No to Cammalleri.

You can not have your LW looking like:

Cammalleri 5'8''
Baertschi 5'10''
Gaudreau 5'7''

If Cammalleri gets signed, I would take that as meaning 1 or both of Gaudreau/Baertschi being traded soon. And given the current state of this team, that would be a shame.
Add in Hudler as one of the top 6 RW'ers, and you have a big problem. That would probably the the smallest and softest top 6 in the NHL. Even the Oilers might have their way with us physically.
Calgary4LIfe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 03:11 PM   #298
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
We have coaches and other veterans for mentoring. Cammalleri would be stealing a roster spot, as the Fonz just mentioned, from one of our talented prospects. He is declining and IMO it's time to move on.
It isnt the same.

We're not up against the cap and he isnt 'stealing' anyone's spot. If you want a team full of children with little to no direction then look 3 hours north and see if you like it.

I think Cammalleri is really good for this team's progression back towards competition and how much they pay him is actually kind of irrelevant.

My ideal scenario is that Cammy stays until we can get something really good for him. And again, in the meantime, who really cares how much he gets paid.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 01-29-2014, 03:14 PM   #299
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

I have to think he will be traded. Cammi knows the situation in Calgary is a rebuild, and that's not changing anytime soon. He is going to get his money with a rebuild team or not. If he wants to stay, i don't think there is much else to think about, and he would have already re-signed.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 03:19 PM   #300
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
It isnt the same.

We're not up against the cap and he isnt 'stealing' anyone's spot. If you want a team full of children with little to no direction then look 3 hours north and see if you like it.

I think Cammalleri is really good for this team's progression back towards competition and how much they pay him is actually kind of irrelevant.

My ideal scenario is that Cammy stays until we can get something really good for him. And again, in the meantime, who really cares how much he gets paid.
Please don't bring the Oilers into this. They are just a bad org top to bottom.

I'm not sure why Cammaller is good for our progression. I see an underperforming, undersized sniper who plays a position we have depth at, who asked for a trade in the summer, and who can probably get us a decent return at the deadline.

How much you pay a player is always relevant. Just because we have cap space now doesn't mean we won't be kicking ourselves in 3 years if we signed some plug UFA like a Boyd Gordon to a 3.75/year AAV contract (sorry for bringing up the Oilers again)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:48 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy