Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum > Tech Talk
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2013, 01:16 PM   #721
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

I noticed in years past that TV prices went up before Xmas but there were some fine deals around boxing day. Sony seems to deep cut prices on theirs, as the new models will be coming out soon.

Personally I'd go with a Panasonic plasma though I like my Sony as well. My Panasonic plasma is a great TV.

Last edited by Vulcan; 12-15-2013 at 01:19 PM.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2013, 01:37 PM   #722
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Agree on Sony, Samsung, and Sharp for LCDs.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2013, 02:24 PM   #723
Brannigans Law
First Line Centre
 
Brannigans Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

My Sony that was discussed earlier in the thread, the KDL 900 or 905 is now 2199. Went back to the store and got 100 bucks off my tv refunded. Amazing Tv. If you want an LED tv and your range of size is 55-60", this tv is impossible to beat imo.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2 View Post
Well, deal with it. I wasn't cheering for Canada either way. Nothing worse than arrogant Canadian fans. They'd be lucky to finish 4th. Quote me on that. They have a bad team and that is why I won't be cheering for them.
Brannigans Law is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2013, 08:01 PM   #724
DownhillGoat
Franchise Player
 
DownhillGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Does Plasma still need a dark room to really look nice?
Not nearly as muchso as the older versions. It certainly helps but they're okay in mid-light.

If you're interested feel free to drop by and have a look at my VT60 in the afternoon. I'll still go plasma over LCD 10 times out of 10...
DownhillGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DownhillGoat For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2013, 08:38 PM   #725
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Thanks for the suggestions, really appreciate it.

Does Plasma still need a dark room to really look nice? Our living is really bright most of the time (west AND south facing windows), and I know plasmas in the past were better for more of a basement home theatre type of experience.
Table, man, I wouldn't really entertain plasma at this point.

LED offers a generally better image for less wattage, all things considered.

If you're in a south facing condo with no control over sunlight, then maybe plasma is for you, but otherwise, I don't know if you can go wrong with a major brand in LED at this point.

I've been doing the same avsforum non-buying as you lately, anticipating the death of my 4 year old, still functioning well, Sharp LCD.

I can recommend sharp as the only brand among several people I know not to fail.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2013, 11:46 PM   #726
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Thanks for the suggestions guys.

Part of me is shying away from Plasma as it's tech on the way out. Not sure if that should make a big difference though. They eat quiet a lot more energy as well don't they?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brannigans Law View Post
My Sony that was discussed earlier in the thread, the KDL 900 or 905 is now 2199. Went back to the store and got 100 bucks off my tv refunded. Amazing Tv. If you want an LED tv and your range of size is 55-60", this tv is impossible to beat imo.
That does look like a fantastic model... a friend of mine has one and he's always raving about it. By any chance did you look at the 802 in comparison? I'm not sure if the extra grand of the 900 is worth it...but I haven't seen them in person yet to compare.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
I've been doing the same avsforum non-buying as you lately, anticipating the death of my 4 year old, still functioning well, Sharp LCD.

I can recommend sharp as the only brand among several people I know not to fail.
It's kind of disappointing that TV's last this short of a time these days. I remember how the old CRT's could last you a couple of decades fairly easily.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2013, 12:20 AM   #727
DownhillGoat
Franchise Player
 
DownhillGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
LED offers a generally better image for less wattage, all things considered.
DownhillGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to DownhillGoat For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2013, 06:49 AM   #728
Deviaant
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Exp:
Default

For what it's worth I picked up a Samsung F8500 a couple of months ago and I could not be happier with it. It's a plasma and in my main living room I don't get much glare during mid day sun. That soap opera effect really bothered me on other tv sets but it's a non issue with my Samsung at all. It's a 3d tv but I've never used it as I have some eye issues. The touchpad remote is great it's got probably 12 buttons so it's very user friendly.

It's worth a look.
Deviaant is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Deviaant For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2013, 07:32 AM   #729
red sky
#1 Goaltender
 
red sky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

The soap opera effect can be turned off on all TVs I believe.

On another note, has anyone ever used one of these video processors:

http://darbeevision.com/darblet/

Looks pretty neat.
red sky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2013, 07:50 AM   #730
darklord700
First Line Centre
 
darklord700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Thanks for the suggestions guys.

Part of me is shying away from Plasma as it's tech on the way out. Not sure if that should make a big difference though. They eat quiet a lot more energy as well don't they?
Nothing in tech holds it's value well nowadays with things moving so fast. Plasma being on the way out isn't a consideration for me. Unless you are using it 24/7 or any prolong period of time, the extra energy cost should minuscule.

If I'm in the market today I would seriously look at the Panasonic plasma. My last flat panel was a Pioneer Kuro from 2008, it's only 720p but I still cannot fine a good enough reason to replace it.
darklord700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2013, 09:38 AM   #731
OldDutch
#1 Goaltender
 
OldDutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
Exp:
Default

Table, my 2 cents.

- Even a mid-range plasma will outshine LED/LCD picture any day of the week. It is not opinion but science. LED's have a harder time reaching true black which is the measure of picture quality than plasma. Even a mid range Panasonic ST will outshine top level LED sets on picture. If picture quality is important, get a plasma.

- Yes plasma are more light sensitive. However, they have anti-glare built in to many sets. They are not as good by and large as LED in very bright rooms, but a bit of light should not hurt performance.

- Yes they use more power, but honestly the cost savings if on all the time is like $35-$50 a year. It's not insanely more.

To me Plasma are best for home theatre use (and people who have seen good Plasmas and therefore know better picture exists). LED are best for general TV watching. You can switch either technology, but really that is where they shine.

On the side, I would not worry about Plasma going out of production. Panasonic will be around for the life of that set if you need to warranty anything.

Last edited by OldDutch; 12-16-2013 at 09:40 AM.
OldDutch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to OldDutch For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2013, 09:45 AM   #732
darklord700
First Line Centre
 
darklord700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Another pros for the plasma:

No need to worry about motion blur as refresh for plasma is almost instantaneous.
Burn in has almost be eliminated in the last gen plasma.
Cheaper than top of the line LCD but generally less in price.

Cons against plamsa:
For some reasons, plasma tech is not as sexy as LCD.
Heavier than LCD
darklord700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2013, 09:48 AM   #733
PsYcNeT
Franchise Player
 
PsYcNeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
Exp:
Default

I think we need to start a Plasma vs. LCD thunderdome thread.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
PsYcNeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2013, 09:56 AM   #734
darklord700
First Line Centre
 
darklord700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT View Post
I think we need to start a Plasma vs. LCD thunderdome thread.
Nowadays at these low price levels, it's really hard to mess up whether you buy plasma and LCD.
darklord700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2013, 11:37 AM   #735
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by red sky View Post
The soap opera effect can be turned off on all TVs I believe.

On another note, has anyone ever used one of these video processors:

http://darbeevision.com/darblet/

Looks pretty neat.
Looks like a sharpen filter and some contrast adjustments. Not sure how much I'd like that on a regular basis. Interesting though.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2013, 12:07 PM   #736
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Hmm, you guys have me thinking about plasma now. The Panasonic models do seem to get great reviews, although price wise they are also more expensive.

I would say 80% of what we watch is basic hd TV (and about 25% of that being hockey), 10% DVD/Blueray, and 10% Netflix. Does Plasma have any weird jutter or motion blur issues watching sports? I think that's kind of my priority, as I don't really care that much about how old reruns of Seinfeld look.

I'm still a little concerned about watching it in a brighter room (our living room is REALLY bright in the summer), but deeper darks should help with that.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2013, 12:13 PM   #737
Deviaant
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Exp:
Default

No motion blur or degrigation of image at all. Seriously Samsung F8500 or the vt60 both are arguably the best plasmas on the market. The blacks look like ink
Deviaant is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Deviaant For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2013, 12:15 PM   #738
darklord700
First Line Centre
 
darklord700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Does Plasma have any weird jutter or motion blur issues watching sports? I think that's kind of my priority, as I don't really care that much about how old reruns of Seinfeld look.

I'm still a little concerned about watching it in a brighter room (our living room is REALLY bright in the summer), but deeper darks should help with that.
Plasma has almost instantaneous refresh rate, hence, motion blur is non existent in plasma. This is one strong argument buying plasma over lcd. All these 120 hz, super flow engine etc are not required in plasma but are there to overcome LCD's main shortcoming of slow refresh rate.

LCD will be better in a brighter room but generally watching anything in a bright room sucks.
darklord700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2013, 12:17 PM   #739
Burninator
Franchise Player
 
Burninator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Table would there be light shining directly on the screen?
Burninator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2013, 12:22 PM   #740
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator View Post
Table would there be light shining directly on the screen?
At some points yes. We have curtains of course to control that a bit, but I also dont necessarily want to get rid of all available light just to watch TV.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy