Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2013, 11:43 AM   #181
Duke43
Backup Goalie
 
Duke43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Penticton in Spring/Summer, Las Vegas in Fall/Winter
Exp:
Default Switch away

How about sending Berra down to Abbotsford for a spell and bringing Johnny Ortio up to see where he fits in the mix
__________________
I am not afraid of death, I just don't want to be there when it happens! - Woody Allen
Duke43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 11:56 AM   #182
OzSome
Franchise Player
 
OzSome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FAN View Post
I agree with the small sample size, but I hate the philosophy of playing the two goalies and seeing how they evolve. Goaltenders are different from other positional players. Backup goalies are practically worthless in a trade. Average #1 goalies have little trade value. Unproven #1 goalies with top 15-top 20 upside have little trade value.

The reason you have management and scouts watching games is to know the team and identify things such as guys who can be core players and positions that needs upgrades. It's fine keeping Berra around and see how he evolves because he's cheap and under team control for another year. But Ramo? You can talk about sample size, but management's job is to figure out as soon as possible whether Ramo can be and will be capable of filling that #1 goaltender position. The worst thing for a rebuilding team is to spend years waiting for their potential #1 goalie to develop into one, passing up on opportunities to acquire a true #1 goalie, and setting back the rebuild for years.
I absolutely hated the fact that people are always worried about TRADES. I agree with Enoch Root to let them play both goaltenders and see what they can do. It is a rebuilding season so this is the best time to find how these two goalies plays. These guys are not 19, 20 or even 21 years old anymore. They are older and more mature goalies. Let's not worry about the Trade Value for now. If one of these guys or both of them turned out to be another Kipper or a good starting goalie then it will be awesome. If not, then at least we know. It buys us time to see Gilles develop in NCAA and maybe AHL or NHL.
OzSome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 12:03 PM   #183
MissTeeks
Franchise Player
 
MissTeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Pat Steinberg@Fan960Steinberg19m

Karri Ramo starts for the #Flames tomorrow.
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
MissTeeks is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MissTeeks For This Useful Post:
Old 12-03-2013, 12:07 PM   #184
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

^ that is the correct and just decision, IMO.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 12:09 PM   #185
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke43 View Post
How about sending Berra down to Abbotsford for a spell and bringing Johnny Ortio up to see where he fits in the mix
I think there is no point in rushing Ortio up at this point.

He seems to be doing well so far in the AHL and it is so early in the season for all guys that I think moving them up and down isn't good for anyone Flames included.

I would actually prefer that they just keep Ortio down in the AHL and use next year to assess him at the NHL.

This year should be focused on figuring out what we have in Berra and Ramo at the NHL level and would prefer to see them roughly split the games left in the NHL season.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 12-03-2013, 05:52 PM   #186
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I think the key is to have both Ramo and Berra pushing each other to get better. They have all year to do it, so hopefully by the end of the year both are better, or at least one guy has distanced himself from the other.
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 11:31 PM   #187
Wastedyouth
Truculent!
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Smug
Wastedyouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 05:08 AM   #188
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Not sure what your problem with Ramo is, but he will require a similar amount of time to assess as Berra will.

Is your argument that, because he makes $2.7m, he shouldn't get as much time?

That is a ridiculous argument. The Flames have several goalie prospects in various levels of development. It will take time to play out. None of the salaries are such that they materially change that.

At the same time, the organization is also free to evaluate whether or not to acquire another goalie.

Your arguments, and desire to treat Ramo differently, make no sense.
Not sure why it's hard to understand. Contract status matters. Berra can be treated differently because he's cheap and has another year under team control. That means that no matter how he plays this year, there's another year before the Flames really have to decide what to do with him. If he ####s the bed the team can release him. If he shows promise but deemed not ready to handle a large workload, he can be re-signed to a one-year contract and see if he will develop into a #1 goalie or at the very least he can serve as a decently priced backup. If he is clearly on an upwards trajectory but maybe not quite ready to handle #1 duties next season the Flames can look to sign him to a longer deal that pays him more in year 2 and maybe even year 3. There's a lot of flexibility here.

Ramo is in a completely different situation. He's signed for another year. If he proves himself to be a capable #1 goalie the Flames might be willing to simply go with him for another year or even more. But if he completely ####s the bed or clearly isn't #1 goalie material, the Flames might have problems, because they might not want to have him in the AHL or serve as a backup goaltender making $2.9M in actual dollars. So what can the Flames do if they feel they can't go with Ramo and Berra as a tandem another season? Ramo's contract makes him practically immovable.

Keep in mind that with Burke here, there's no guarantee that the Flames want to continue being well under the cap. It's possible that with Monahan's development, Burke sees an opportunity to compete for the playoffs as soon as next season. Burke also isn't the most patient with inadequate goaltending.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse View Post
I fail to see how the Flames are passing on opportunities in any way right now.

Also; "true #1" is often code for "franchise" when it comes to goaltenders and centers.

Looking at the recent championship goaltenders, good goaltending will do, great is not needed. Both Berra and Rämö could be good, although Rämö I agree is a bit of a stretch.
How do you know the Flames aren't passing on opportunities with a goalie signed for another year taking up a $2.75M cap hit?

Also, "true #1" isn't code for "franchise" when it comes to goaltenders anymore, because franchises rarely build their team around their goaltenders nowadays.

The quality of goaltending can completely change the fortunes of a team. Look at Craig Anderson's season to season performance and his team's performance. Look at Bobrovsky. You want a true gauge of how good of a team you have you need good goaltending.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 05:20 AM   #189
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzSome View Post
I absolutely hated the fact that people are always worried about TRADES. I agree with Enoch Root to let them play both goaltenders and see what they can do. It is a rebuilding season so this is the best time to find how these two goalies plays. These guys are not 19, 20 or even 21 years old anymore. They are older and more mature goalies. Let's not worry about the Trade Value for now. If one of these guys or both of them turned out to be another Kipper or a good starting goalie then it will be awesome. If not, then at least we know. It buys us time to see Gilles develop in NCAA and maybe AHL or NHL.
My point was that it is management and their scouts' jobs to determine whether the ceilings of these goaltenders and the likelihood of them developing into good #1 goaltenders. If they don't think it's likely that they will develop into good #1s, I say get rid of Ramo (due to his contract status) ASAP and try to bring a guy in here who is capable of developing into a good #1 goalie. As much as some fans want this team to tank, the purpose isn't to tank. Also, just because it's a rebuilding year doesn't mean you waste development time. If the team thinks Berra has more upside play him. If you're looking for a stop gap then Ramo is a terrible choice. Should have signed a goalie to a one-year deal.

My point is that management and scouts should do their due diligence. if they don't think Ramo will amount to much then don't waste time on him. Don't take a wait and see approach. Get on the phones and see if there are upgrades available at a good price.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 09:05 AM   #190
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FAN View Post
Ramo is in a completely different situation. He's signed for another year. If he proves himself to be a capable #1 goalie the Flames might be willing to simply go with him for another year or even more. But if he completely ####s the bed or clearly isn't #1 goalie material, the Flames might have problems, because they might not want to have him in the AHL or serve as a backup goaltender making $2.9M in actual dollars. So what can the Flames do if they feel they can't go with Ramo and Berra as a tandem another season? Ramo's contract makes him practically immovable.

Keep in mind that with Burke here, there's no guarantee that the Flames want to continue being well under the cap. It's possible that with Monahan's development, Burke sees an opportunity to compete for the playoffs as soon as next season. Burke also isn't the most patient with inadequate goaltending.
You keep attempting to argue that Ramo's contract is some massive albatross that will become a problem for the team. You seem to be pretty much alone in that view - it simply isn't.

1) it will take time to determine what Ramo is - likely this full season at least. If he fails, there is only one more year on the contract at $2.75m - not that big of a deal.

2) as has been pointed out to you more than once, if he fails and is not going to play for the Flames next year, it seems very likely that both he and the Flames would entertain the KHL. If that were the case, his cap hit would be gone.

It is not the big deal that you are trying to make it out to be.

Oh, and then there is the fact that he has been fantastic in the last two games - something that you also seem to have ignored.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 12-05-2013, 03:43 PM   #191
Stanley
First Line Centre
 
Stanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Fairly impressed with Ramo last couple games, although the team has played better in front of him too. Just his rebound control and puck handling could use some major improvement...
Stanley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Stanley For This Useful Post:
Old 12-08-2013, 01:59 AM   #192
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Originally posted in last nights PGT but decided it was better suited here.

So much Berra hate in the GT thread even though he played a solid game. Incredible, but makes me happy that people won't be able to handle a rebuild and it will burn off the bandwagon.

Look at the stats.

W/L Pretty equal
Ramo 5-5
Berra 6-6

GA Pretty equal
Ramo 3.00
Berra 3.28

SV% Pretty equal
Ramo - .896%
Berra - .894%

Some say you should look past stats. OK. Ramo looked great in his 2 games this week, very composed. But also consider that the bulk of Berra's starts were when the team was playing like garbage and was without Gio. Tonight he looked great as well. Berra's also doing a LOT better than Ramo did in his first games in the NHL, in his time with the lightning I'm pretty sure he went 7-11 one season and 4-24 the next (although I'm not sure how many of those were starts.) but even his AHL record is bad. It takes time to learn NA ice, and I think Berra's doing it really well so far.

I'm not biased either way, I think alternating starts is the way to go until one emerges as a clear #1, and right now I see the potential in both.

To people who want to throw either one of these guys under the bus, why? It's a rebuild You want to throw all our eggs into one basket and just hope it works out? Because I'd rather take our time and do it properly, which is the same reason I want to see Ortio spend the whole season in the AHL.

Unfortunately we're going to lose a few bad games because we're trying new things. Easiest way to learn is to make mistakes, and it's not like they're not learning. Both have already improved their poor rebound control, and Berra's starting to look more composed every game.

You can't expect another Kipprusoff, most goalies aren't just going to fall into our laps and be great from the start.

/rant

Last edited by btimbit; 12-08-2013 at 04:22 PM.
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 01:44 PM   #193
Flames Fan, Ph.D.
#1 Goaltender
 
Flames Fan, Ph.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
Exp:
Default

I think a good chunk of the Berra hate is fueled by Hartley's preferential treatment of one goaltender over the other. Not Berra's fault obviously, but it makes people more critical.
Flames Fan, Ph.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 01:47 PM   #194
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

And Berra gets the start tomorrow. Fire Hartley? Anyone? Anyone?..

Alright. Berra had a solid outting against the Oilers and deserves the start IMO. And I think we will likely see from here on out, the win one get another start tactic. Both Ramo and Berra have appeared to be settling in now.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 02:21 PM   #195
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Can we play Ramo and berra together? At the same time? Might be able to put together a complete game that way...

Giving up a goal with 11 seconds left, ugh...
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 02:25 PM   #196
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

I think both have potential...pretty equal if you ask me both have their flaws that hopefully they can work out.

I do find it funny that 80% of CPers seem to rag on Berra when then have basically the exact same numbers
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 06:15 PM   #197
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Fan, Ph.D. View Post
I think a good chunk of the Berra hate is fueled by Hartley's preferential treatment of one goaltender over the other. Not Berra's fault obviously, but it makes people more critical.
It's no secret that Hartley loves players that have played in the Swiss league, and in Berra's case it's because Bob has seen how well he's performed there. But Berra only has 2 more starts than Ramo.

Last edited by btimbit; 12-09-2013 at 09:43 PM.
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 12-09-2013, 09:54 PM   #198
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
Can we play Ramo and berra together? At the same time? Might be able to put together a complete game that way...

Giving up a goal with 11 seconds left, ugh...
Ramo plays the first two periods; Berra plays the third and the inevitable OT/shootout.

Flames go undefeated the rest of the season. Hartley wins coach of the year
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 10:12 PM   #199
krynski
First Line Centre
 
krynski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Behind Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke43 View Post
How about sending Berra down to Abbotsford for a spell and bringing Johnny Ortio up to see where he fits in the mix
I would love to see Ortio in the mix.

I don't want to rush him though. It would also be nice if he had a consistent team in front of him. I say give him a taste with a game or two in the last couple games of the season (if he is still doing well in abby, and games that don't really mean anything) and see if that pans out well. The last thing i'd like to do it hand him a couple of important game losses and destroy his progression.
krynski is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to krynski For This Useful Post:
Old 12-10-2013, 01:02 AM   #200
4oh3
Powerplay Quarterback
 
4oh3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvp2003 View Post
Ramo plays the first two periods; Berra plays the third and the inevitable OT/shootout.



Flames go undefeated the rest of the season. Hartley wins coach of the year

Maybe one day nhl goalies will be like mlb pitchers you get a starter some relievers and a closer haha
__________________
Go Flames Go
4oh3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
keep calm and karri ramo , merci berra


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy