Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-19-2013, 02:38 PM   #41
Komskies
Franchise Player
 
Komskies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Had it ever happened that a team iced a squad consisting of all their own picks except for 3? I just don't see this happening. That many develop into NHLers? Either that's a terrible team, or we get very lucky
This is semi relevant to your post but I saw this on Reddit a couple of weeks ago.



Last year's Hawks roster had 11 of their players acquired through the draft.
Komskies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 02:39 PM   #42
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Haha. Well it was more of a best case scenario lineup.

It's really hard to predict which players currently outside the organization would find their way here. But you're right, it's very likely that there will be more externally acquired peices in the actual roster. And also assuming we're even lucky enough to pick both Ekblad and McDavid..
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 02:39 PM   #43
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Ha, you'll have to out-suck us the next couple years!
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 02:41 PM   #44
Ark2
Franchise Player
 
Ark2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I can't see us being bad enough to get McDavid.
I would suggest you watch the Flames play then. They are that bad.
Ark2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 02:43 PM   #45
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ark2 View Post
I would suggest you watch the Flames play then. They are that bad.
Buffalo, Florida, Edmonton and some others say hello. Like other posters have said: "We're bad but it crazy that four other teams are worse than us". And I do not see the Flames being worse next year. Just my projection but I'll be happy if they can get Ekblad. McDavid I am treating like a pipe dream. Because some team will in fact out suck the rest of the NHL and It wont be the Flames.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-19-2013, 02:48 PM   #46
Ark2
Franchise Player
 
Ark2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Buffalo, Florida, Edmonton and some others say hello. Like other posters have said: "We're bad but it crazy that four other teams are worse than us". And I do not see the Flames being worse next year. Just my projection but I'll be happy if they can get Ekblad. McDavid I am treating like a pipe dream. Because some team will in fact out suck the rest of the NHL and It wont be the Flames.
There are 4 teams that are worse then us simply because Calgary had a good start that lasted 8 games. Shooting percentages were high, the young guys had that extra jump and the puck was bouncing right for us. That has stopped now. Our goaltending is worst in the league. No question about that. Our defence is bottom 3 and I would argue that our offense is right around there as well. In the likely event that we trade Cammy and Stajan at the deadline, we become the worst offensive team in the league. Don't let a good start fool you folks. An 82 game season smooths that out. We will be bottom three this season.
Ark2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 02:48 PM   #47
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Buffalo, Florida, Edmonton and some others say hello. Like other posters have said: "We're bad but it crazy that four other teams are worse than us". And I do not see the Flames being worse next year. Just my projection but I'll be happy if they can get Ekblad. McDavid I am treating like a pipe dream. Because some team will in fact out suck the rest of the NHL and It wont be the Flames.
i think you take out the stajans, stempniaks, cammalleri's, and inject some strong contributors from the Heat, and the flames will be in lottery contention durign 2014, which positions us well for mcdavid.

however, it doesn't sound like management will be sitting idle, and hope to use the salary cap to try to land some big fish. If they fail, however, think we're good to being in lottery discussion.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 02:49 PM   #48
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

I would rather end up in the 4-10 range of picks for this year and next. Get some wins under your belt, some solid veteran tutelage and some solid players while still having a stab at the draft lottery.

The key to successful rebuilds is not picking some superstar first overall, it is having your 2nd-7th round picks turn into NHLers. If you can have a steady stream of young, cheap 2nd-4th line, 3rd - 6th Dman talent coming in you can bring in top line wingers/dmen during UFA and trades. Really #1 Centers are the hardest to obtain and the Flames should be taking as many shots in the draft for one as they can.
Knut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 02:51 PM   #49
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

And #1 D, though I'm not sure how you draft that
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 02:56 PM   #50
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ark2 View Post
There are 4 teams that are worse then us simply because Calgary had a good start that lasted 8 games. Shooting percentages were high, the young guys had that extra jump and the puck was bouncing right for us. That has stopped now. Our goaltending is worst in the league. No question about that. Our defence is bottom 3 and I would argue that our offense is right around there as well. In the likely event that we trade Cammy and Stajan at the deadline, we become the worst offensive team in the league. Don't let a good start fool you folks. An 82 game season smooths that out. We will be bottom three this season.
Who's being fooled? We all know they're a bad team. You talk as if you're the only one who can see some secret that no one else knows.
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to the2bears For This Useful Post:
Old 11-19-2013, 03:03 PM   #51
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

Is the rest of the 2015 draft looking promising? Or just one guy?
__________________
FBI is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 03:16 PM   #52
foshizzle11
#1 Goaltender
 
foshizzle11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Komskies View Post
This is semi relevant to your post but I saw this on Reddit a couple of weeks ago.



Last year's Hawks roster had 11 of their players acquired through the draft.
That is very interesting. I've never seen something like that before.

We can't only build threw the draft but also needs more than half the team from UFAs and trades.

I'm pretty happy to have Burke.
__________________
"You're worried about the team not having enough heart. I'm worried about the team not having enough brains." HFOil fan, August 12th, 2020. E=NG
foshizzle11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 03:18 PM   #53
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

I still say the Canucks will draft him.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 03:20 PM   #54
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FBI View Post
Is the rest of the 2015 draft looking promising? Or just one guy?
I honestly haven't heard any talk about the 2015 draft besides McDavid.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 03:20 PM   #55
Cole436
First Line Centre
 
Cole436's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

I can't see us being worse next year than we are now.
Bart and Monahan will be a year older and taking 2nd-1st line duty.
Our defence will be almost the same, with the outside chance of an Ekblad on the back end.

This was our year to suck.
__________________
Cole436 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 03:24 PM   #56
dissentowner
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ark2 View Post
There are 4 teams that are worse then us simply because Calgary had a good start that lasted 8 games. Shooting percentages were high, the young guys had that extra jump and the puck was bouncing right for us. That has stopped now. Our goaltending is worst in the league. No question about that. Our defence is bottom 3 and I would argue that our offense is right around there as well. In the likely event that we trade Cammy and Stajan at the deadline, we become the worst offensive team in the league. Don't let a good start fool you folks. An 82 game season smooths that out. We will be bottom three this season.
Exactly, we will probably pick #3 this year. Just good enough to miss out on Ekblad and Sam R.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 03:27 PM   #57
trackercowe
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

If it's rigged I wager he lands up in New Jersey; especially since they won't have a first rounder this year.
trackercowe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to trackercowe For This Useful Post:
Old 11-19-2013, 03:28 PM   #58
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by foshizzle11 View Post
That is very interesting. I've never seen something like that before.

We can't only build threw the draft but also needs more than half the team from UFAs and trades.
What that graph doesn't who is how much of the core is drafted vs UFA and trade. For example, Chicago's core:

Toews - Draft
Kane - Draft
Hossa - UFA
Sharpe - Trade
Keith - Draft
Seabrook - Draft

I think we'd see the same with the rest of the teams: 4/6 of the core players drafted, and mostly drafted high.

I see trades and UFAs as the way to supplement or make lateral adjustment to the roster. But the core comes through the draft.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 03:29 PM   #59
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Exactly, we will probably pick #3 this year. Just good enough to miss out on Ekblad and Sam R.
I think Ekblad slides. Look what happened with Jones this year, and he's considered a better prospect than Ekblad. Teams are really starting to shy away from drafting d-men in the top 3.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 03:30 PM   #60
Hemi-Cuda
wins 10 internets
 
Hemi-Cuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trackercowe View Post
If it's rigged I wager he lands up in New Jersey; especially since they won't have a first rounder this year.
Too small of a market. My guess is that he goes to Philly to reignite the Pennsylvania rivalry, and of the big American hockey markets they have the longest cup drought
Hemi-Cuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy