Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-26-2013, 05:23 AM   #1
JurassicTunga12
Franchise Player
 
JurassicTunga12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Icon45 Leafs sign Cody Franson [1 year, $2mil]

Darren Dreger ‏@DarrenDreger Confirming Cody Franson has agreed to a 1 yr, $2 mil dollar deal with the Leafs. Took far less, but got the 1 yr term he fought for.
JurassicTunga12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 05:24 AM   #2
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

do they need to make more moves to make this fit, or are they under the cap still?
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 06:55 AM   #3
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
do they need to make more moves to make this fit, or are they under the cap still?
Fan960 commented this morning the Leafs are approximately 1M over cap.

Leafs will need to create some cap space for sure....

I believe the Leafs have till Monday to get their cap in alignment.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2013, 07:08 AM   #4
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

so will they trade him at the deadline because I don't think he has a future with the leafs.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 07:33 AM   #5
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

it really depends on how the season goes. If they are not a playoff team come deadline, i fully expect phanuef to be dealt.

it will be interesting to see if rielly makes the team, as they suddenly have a bit of an issue on the backend with too many bodies around.

am somewhat shocked liles hasn't been moved yet.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 08:32 AM   #6
dissentowner
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post

am somewhat shocked liles hasn't been moved yet.
I'm not, nobody wants to eat that contract.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2013, 08:36 AM   #7
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Lebrun says that they can fit him under the cap but only if they have a bare bones roster (20 players instead of 23).

That pretty much means a trade, or they're about to lose Colborne on waivers.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 08:44 AM   #8
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Wonder what the Leafs would give the Flames for taking Liles off their hands
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 08:49 AM   #9
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

The Flames should be asking for a 2nd at the least, throw in some scrubs to even it out for optics sake.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 08:54 AM   #10
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Ridiculously cheap deal for Franson and there's no way he's back next year unless they clear some cap space. I wouldn't be shocked to see him traded at the deadline if they're out of it.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 09:04 AM   #11
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
Wonder what the Leafs would give the Flames for taking Liles off their hands
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 09:06 AM   #12
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
The Flames should be asking for a 2nd at the least, throw in some scrubs to even it out for optics sake.
a three year contract for a smallish puckmoving 4th at best defensemen over $3 million bucks a year?

pass, he's literally untradable and not a defensemen that we need.

If we did pick him up, we'd probably end up packaging that 2nd just to move him at the deadline.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2013, 09:10 AM   #13
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
a three year contract for a smallish puckmoving 4th at best defensemen over $3 million bucks a year?

pass, he's literally untradable and not a defensemen that we need.

If we did pick him up, we'd probably end up packaging that 2nd just to move him at the deadline.
I don't see 3 mil per being that much of a concern for this cap strapped team. If we could pick up a second and move some of the other obvious concerns on D further down the depth chart so be it.

Last edited by Yoho; 09-26-2013 at 09:53 AM.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 09:17 AM   #14
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

It's 3.875. Significant amount over 3 years.

I've been using the Lombardi-Franson to Toronto trade as a comparable. The Leafs took on Lombardi for 2 years, but also got Franson as compensation.

Likes makes more than Lombardi did and for more term.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 09:22 AM   #15
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

can a team retain salary in a trade for certain years of the contract?
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 09:50 AM   #16
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I'm not, nobody wants to eat that contract.
shocked in the sense that, isn't this sort of the position feaster (and perhaps other teams) wanted to be in, to gain assets from teams that are in a cap crunch?

Liles isn't an "asset" per say, but depending on how tight things are for the leafs, curious what throw ins we could get for him. I would also place him higher on the flames depth chart, than o'brien, butler, smith, and probably russel. it's not good cap hit, it's not a good term, but again, i think a deal is there to be had that still can benefit both parties.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 09:53 AM   #17
BigTuna
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
so will they trade him at the deadline because I don't think he has a future with the leafs.
He's RFA next summer, so no.
BigTuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 09:54 AM   #18
BigTuna
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
It's 3.875. Significant amount over 3 years.

I've been using the Lombardi-Franson to Toronto trade as a comparable. The Leafs took on Lombardi for 2 years, but also got Franson as compensation.

Likes makes more than Lombardi did and for more term.
Nashville did it because they were bleeding money. The Leafs are the richest team. They can still move other bodies and make it work.
BigTuna is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BigTuna For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2013, 09:55 AM   #19
BigTuna
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Flames Fan View Post
Ridiculously cheap deal for Franson and there's no way he's back next year unless they clear some cap space. I wouldn't be shocked to see him traded at the deadline if they're out of it.
The Leafs have a ton of cap room next season. This is a 1 year issue only. And he's RFA, so they won't trade him.
BigTuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 10:03 AM   #20
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigTuna View Post
The Leafs have a ton of cap room next season. This is a 1 year issue only. And he's RFA, so they won't trade him.
They didn't want a one year deal with Franson becuase they have to many UFA players that are ahead of him in order of importance. He still could be traded if they think his arbitration case will be to high.

On another note, someone told me that Franson was eligible for arbitration this year. He turned it down because he thought he could get a good deal with Toronto. Is this true? If so, he must be kicking himself.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy