07-15-2013, 08:09 AM
|
#1
|
|
Loblaw to buy Shoppers Drug Mart for $12.4B
Another big buy out, this one is interesting as well.
Quote:
Loblaw, Canada's largest supermarket chain, has agreed to buy Shoppers Drug Mart for $12.4 billion, the companies announced early Monday.
Toronto-based Loblaw will acquire all outstanding common shares in Shoppers, gaining some 1,200 drug stores in all provinces — many of them small locations in urban markets — in return for cash and Loblaw shares.
|
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toront...-shoppers.html
Last edited by Superflyer; 07-15-2013 at 08:16 AM.
Reason: Link to article might help
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 08:13 AM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
I got my email this morning. Business as usual for Shoppers. At least for the time being
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 08:23 AM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
|
Appears Canadian retail consumer goods market is consolidating a heck of a lot faster than anyone expected.
Good for their fight against US mega-competition, but not a huge fan of the majority of options now controlled by basically 2 families. Less choice and competition is rarely a good thing.
All that's left is for Loblaws to buyout Pattison's Save-On-Foods and the entire market is either Sobeys or Loblaw
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:00 AM
|
#4
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
how does co-op fit into this? are they not a legitimate retailer outside of western canada?
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:29 AM
|
#5
|
First Line Centre
|
I don't think Co-op could ever be sold due to its corporate structure. It's basically a customer owned chain I think.
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:29 AM
|
#6
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
|
Does anyone know if this is a sure thing or if the shareholders have to ratify it first?
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:31 AM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt
Does anyone know if this is a sure thing or if the shareholders have to ratify it first?
|
They do have to, but they will. The bid was at a big premium, so the shareholders will take their huge profits and do something else with them. Those who still like the business can keep their Loblaw stock. Approval is a formality unless someone bids more, but I can't think of anyone that would. (Maybe a big US drug chain?)
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:32 AM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
|
Considering Shoppers shareholders are getting a 29% premium to be bought out, I'll be surprised if this doesn't go through.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:34 AM
|
#9
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yanda
how does co-op fit into this? are they not a legitimate retailer outside of western canada?
|
Co-Op is also a common name for completely independent cooperatives.
Calgary Co-Op only operates around Calgary. I don't think Edmonton has a Co-Op and the one in Grande Prairie is different. Same Co-Op Gold branding but independent which would make it difficult to buy out and also difficult to grow it into a large competitor.
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:35 AM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
$12.4B is quite a lot. I had no idea Shoppers Drug Mart was that big a size of company.
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:35 AM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
Considering Shoppers shareholders are getting a 29% premium to be bought out, I'll be surprised if this doesn't go through.
|
And Galen Weston holds like 60% of Loblaws shares so that's a formality. Only potential pitfall is regulatory approval.
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:37 AM
|
#12
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
|
The reason I ask is because a lot of the employees are shareholders who might turn down profits if they are worried their job is in danger. The bigger shareholders are likely in management and associate positions.
I have no idea of the scale though and as I calculate it in my head I can see that they wouldn't have nearly enough weight to sway the vote.
Carry on.
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:41 AM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt
The reason I ask is because a lot of the employees are shareholders who might turn down profits if they are worried their job is in danger. The bigger shareholders are likely in management and associate positions.
I have no idea of the scale though and as I calculate it in my head I can see that they wouldn't have nearly enough weight to sway the vote.
Carry on.
|
Employees and Associate Owners are by very far a minority owner.
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:43 AM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt
The reason I ask is because a lot of the employees are shareholders who might turn down profits if they are worried their job is in danger. The bigger shareholders are likely in management and associate positions.
I have no idea of the scale though and as I calculate it in my head I can see that they wouldn't have nearly enough weight to sway the vote.
Carry on.
|
The statement was they weren't closing any stores, but who knows.
In terms of them blocking it, you're right they wouldn't own enough shares. This site: http://www.answers.com/topic/shopper...rt-corporation suggested 53,000 employees. If the employees owned the 50% of the stock needed to block the merger, that would be about $117,000 per person, which is probably much too high for the vast majority of them. Some of the managers/franchise owners may have that much or more, but the average wouldn't be nearly that high.
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 11:49 AM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
|
So, now SDM will slowly transform into RCS... Do not like.
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 12:05 PM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
So, now SDM will slowly transform into RCS... Do not like.
|
Maybe SDM will now stop charging $4.49 for a $2.49 package of crackers / cookies or any other random dry goods.
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 12:11 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulator75
Maybe SDM will now stop charging $4.49 for a $2.49 package of crackers / cookies or any other random dry goods.
|
Maybe. But then we'd have to wait twice longer at the cash register.
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 12:13 PM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
|
wonder if the price of pop will remain the same at the RCS Liquor Store?
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Northendzone For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-15-2013, 12:15 PM
|
#19
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Calgary AB
|
I really dislike how everything is owned by fewer and fewer people. People wonder why the top 1% (and fewer frankly) own so much wealth. Gross. Pretty soon it will be like demolition man where taco bells owns all restaurants.
|
|
|
07-15-2013, 12:15 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
So, now SDM will slowly transform into RCS... Do not like.
|
WTF is RCS?
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:06 AM.
|
|