Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-15-2013, 08:09 AM   #1
Superflyer
Close, but no banana.
 
Superflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default Loblaw to buy Shoppers Drug Mart for $12.4B

Another big buy out, this one is interesting as well.

Quote:
Loblaw, Canada's largest supermarket chain, has agreed to buy Shoppers Drug Mart for $12.4 billion, the companies announced early Monday.

Toronto-based Loblaw will acquire all outstanding common shares in Shoppers, gaining some 1,200 drug stores in all provinces — many of them small locations in urban markets — in return for cash and Loblaw shares.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toront...-shoppers.html

Last edited by Superflyer; 07-15-2013 at 08:16 AM. Reason: Link to article might help
Superflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 08:13 AM   #2
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

I got my email this morning. Business as usual for Shoppers. At least for the time being
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 08:23 AM   #3
Ducay
Franchise Player
 
Ducay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Appears Canadian retail consumer goods market is consolidating a heck of a lot faster than anyone expected.
Good for their fight against US mega-competition, but not a huge fan of the majority of options now controlled by basically 2 families. Less choice and competition is rarely a good thing.

All that's left is for Loblaws to buyout Pattison's Save-On-Foods and the entire market is either Sobeys or Loblaw
Ducay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:00 AM   #4
Yanda
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Yanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

how does co-op fit into this? are they not a legitimate retailer outside of western canada?
Yanda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:29 AM   #5
Ace
First Line Centre
 
Ace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

I don't think Co-op could ever be sold due to its corporate structure. It's basically a customer owned chain I think.
__________________
Ace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:29 AM   #6
GP_Matt
First Line Centre
 
GP_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Does anyone know if this is a sure thing or if the shareholders have to ratify it first?
GP_Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:31 AM   #7
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt View Post
Does anyone know if this is a sure thing or if the shareholders have to ratify it first?
They do have to, but they will. The bid was at a big premium, so the shareholders will take their huge profits and do something else with them. Those who still like the business can keep their Loblaw stock. Approval is a formality unless someone bids more, but I can't think of anyone that would. (Maybe a big US drug chain?)
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:32 AM   #8
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Considering Shoppers shareholders are getting a 29% premium to be bought out, I'll be surprised if this doesn't go through.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:34 AM   #9
GP_Matt
First Line Centre
 
GP_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yanda View Post
how does co-op fit into this? are they not a legitimate retailer outside of western canada?
Co-Op is also a common name for completely independent cooperatives.
Calgary Co-Op only operates around Calgary. I don't think Edmonton has a Co-Op and the one in Grande Prairie is different. Same Co-Op Gold branding but independent which would make it difficult to buy out and also difficult to grow it into a large competitor.
GP_Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:35 AM   #10
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

$12.4B is quite a lot. I had no idea Shoppers Drug Mart was that big a size of company.
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:35 AM   #11
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis View Post
Considering Shoppers shareholders are getting a 29% premium to be bought out, I'll be surprised if this doesn't go through.
And Galen Weston holds like 60% of Loblaws shares so that's a formality. Only potential pitfall is regulatory approval.
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:37 AM   #12
GP_Matt
First Line Centre
 
GP_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

The reason I ask is because a lot of the employees are shareholders who might turn down profits if they are worried their job is in danger. The bigger shareholders are likely in management and associate positions.
I have no idea of the scale though and as I calculate it in my head I can see that they wouldn't have nearly enough weight to sway the vote.
Carry on.
GP_Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:41 AM   #13
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt View Post
The reason I ask is because a lot of the employees are shareholders who might turn down profits if they are worried their job is in danger. The bigger shareholders are likely in management and associate positions.
I have no idea of the scale though and as I calculate it in my head I can see that they wouldn't have nearly enough weight to sway the vote.
Carry on.
Employees and Associate Owners are by very far a minority owner.
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:43 AM   #14
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt View Post
The reason I ask is because a lot of the employees are shareholders who might turn down profits if they are worried their job is in danger. The bigger shareholders are likely in management and associate positions.
I have no idea of the scale though and as I calculate it in my head I can see that they wouldn't have nearly enough weight to sway the vote.
Carry on.
The statement was they weren't closing any stores, but who knows.

In terms of them blocking it, you're right they wouldn't own enough shares. This site: http://www.answers.com/topic/shopper...rt-corporation suggested 53,000 employees. If the employees owned the 50% of the stock needed to block the merger, that would be about $117,000 per person, which is probably much too high for the vast majority of them. Some of the managers/franchise owners may have that much or more, but the average wouldn't be nearly that high.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 11:49 AM   #15
CaptainYooh
Franchise Player
 
CaptainYooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

So, now SDM will slowly transform into RCS... Do not like.
CaptainYooh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 12:05 PM   #16
Regulator75
Franchise Player
 
Regulator75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
So, now SDM will slowly transform into RCS... Do not like.
Maybe SDM will now stop charging $4.49 for a $2.49 package of crackers / cookies or any other random dry goods.
__________________

More photos on Flickr
Regulator75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 12:11 PM   #17
CaptainYooh
Franchise Player
 
CaptainYooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulator75 View Post
Maybe SDM will now stop charging $4.49 for a $2.49 package of crackers / cookies or any other random dry goods.
Maybe. But then we'd have to wait twice longer at the cash register.
CaptainYooh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 12:13 PM   #18
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

wonder if the price of pop will remain the same at the RCS Liquor Store?
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Northendzone For This Useful Post:
Old 07-15-2013, 12:15 PM   #19
Brannigans Law
First Line Centre
 
Brannigans Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

I really dislike how everything is owned by fewer and fewer people. People wonder why the top 1% (and fewer frankly) own so much wealth. Gross. Pretty soon it will be like demolition man where taco bells owns all restaurants.
Brannigans Law is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2013, 12:15 PM   #20
Reaper
Franchise Player
 
Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
So, now SDM will slowly transform into RCS... Do not like.
WTF is RCS?
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy