07-02-2013, 09:56 PM
|
#61
|
RealtorŪ
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
|
I simply cant see Iggy playing for Torts....ever.....if rumor is true that he didnt enjoy being told how things would be with our coaches he has another thing coming!
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 09:59 PM
|
#62
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky
C'mon man. Seriously? This is Jarome Iginla. Favourite to most hated? C'mon.
|
Who cares. If he signs with a rival then it means he doesn't care about Flame fans.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to puckluck2 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:05 PM
|
#63
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
|
I would definitely be hanging up my Iggy White Knight shield if he signs in vancouver. The thought of it makes me sick.
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:05 PM
|
#64
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2
Who cares. If he signs with a rival then it means he doesn't care about Flame fans.
|
Or hockey players don't give a crap about rivalries when it comes to playing for teams?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Joborule For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:08 PM
|
#65
|
Franchise Player
|
Not to be overly critical of Iginla, but is he even fit to play in the top six on some teams? The Chicago, Pittsburgh, and LA's of the world each have a ton of depth, and Iginla doesn't really add anything they don't already have in abundance. Maybe LA could use another scorer, but would Darryl really want to commit to someone who is no longer reliable defensively? Basically Iginla has become mostly a perimeter player pretty much that is only effective on the power play.
He's decent 5 on 5, but can't be used on the penalty kill, nor can he be played late in games when your team is up one or two goals.
Which is why I can't see him re-signing in Pittburgh. LA might be a possibility, but I'd imagine that decision rests in Sutter's hands. Who else would know what exactly Iginla is capable of doing these days?
The Rangers make sense though, as I think they could use them. They're not really the youngest team in the league, but I believe he'd play in the top six there. Vancouver of course works too, just a matter if he wants to play in Vancouver, and "stab" all us Flames fans in the heart.
Although I don't really have an issue with Iginla signing like Vancouver like others do. Hockey is a business first, and if Vancouver offers the best contract I would expect him to take it (I probably would as well). I won't hold it against him, just like I didn't feel really any loyalty towards him when he was in the playoffs. There really isn't any loyalty in sports these days anyway, so it would come as no surprise to me if Iginla does go and play with Calgary's rival.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to trackercowe For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:10 PM
|
#66
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trackercowe
Not to be overly critical of Iginla, but is he even fit to play in the top six on some teams? The Chicago, Pittsburgh, and LA's of the world each have a ton of depth, and Iginla doesn't really add anything they don't already have in abundance. Maybe LA could use another scorer, but would Darryl really want to commit to someone who is no longer reliable defensively? Basically Iginla has become a player pretty much that is only effective on the power play.
He's decent 5 on 5, but can't be used on the penalty kill, nor can he be played late in games when your team is up one or two goals.
Which is why I can't see him re-signing in Pittburgh. LA might be a possibility, but I'd imagine that decision rests in Sutter's hands. Who else would know what exactly Iginla is capable of doing these days?
The Rangers make sense though, as I think they could use them. They're not really the youngest team in the league, but I believe he'd play in the top six there. Vancouver of course works too, just a matter if he wants to play in Vancouver, and "stab" all us Flames fans in the heart.
Although I don't really have an issue with Iginla signing like Vancouver like others do. Hockey is a business first, and if Vancouver offers the best contract I would expect him to take it (I probably would as well). I won't hold it against him, just like I didn't feel really any loyalty towards him when he was in the playoffs. There really isn't any loyalty in sports these days anyway, so it would come as no surprise to me if Iginla does go and play with Calgary's rival.
|
In fairness though, if anyone can get iginla back to how he once was it is in fact, Darryl Sutter.
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:15 PM
|
#67
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I see him playing top 6 if the Canucks land him. Mostly because they've seen him at his best over the years, a lot more than teams in the east or other divisions, and probably feel they can extract that from him again alongside the Sedins. Also, Van these days isn't as stacked as the Chicagos, Bostons and Pittsburghs. Wouldn't be surprised to see that factor in his decision if Gillis and co. offer him top 6 minutes. I'm sure he would've liked to have been used more under Bylsma. But c'mon, Jarome. Don't be forgettin your ABCs. (anybody but the Canucks)
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:16 PM
|
#68
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joborule
Or hockey players don't give a crap about rivalries when it comes to playing for teams?
|
Of course they do. Iginla himself said he hated the Canucks.
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:17 PM
|
#69
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
In fairness though, if anyone can get iginla back to how he once was it is in fact, Darryl Sutter.
|
Can he even make their top six though, I guess they could just slot him in for Dustin Penner (assuming he won't be re-signed). But right now they have Richards, Carter, Brown, Williams, Kopitar, and Toffoli all expected to play in the top six. Unless they take out Toffoli where exactly could Iginla play? He would not make an effective third liner, and I doubt he'd be happy playing limited minutes either.
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:20 PM
|
#70
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
|
Any one but the Canucks Iggy!
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:25 PM
|
#71
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trackercowe
Can he even make their top six though, I guess they could just slot him in for Dustin Penner (assuming he won't be re-signed). But right now they have Richards, Carter, Brown, Williams, Kopitar, and Toffoli all expected to play in the top six. Unless they take out Toffoli where exactly could Iginla play? He would not make an effective third liner, and I doubt he'd be happy playing limited minutes either.
|
Pretty certain Sutter slots him in the top six. Toffoli as the youngster gets pushed down if Iggy goes to L.A. Pancakes I think will not be back. At least thats the thought.
O say this like I am 100% sure thats how it would shake down but in reality I'm making an educated guess as to how Sutter would utilize Iginla. Like I said, if anyone can get the best out of Iggy, it's Sutter and he'll feed him the minutes while he does it.
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:25 PM
|
#72
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: So Long, Bannatyne
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sun
I would definitely be hanging up my Iggy White Knight shield if he signs in vancouver. The thought of it makes me sick.
|
Remember when KLowe(n) said that the reason he never signed with the Flames at the tail end of his career was because, in his mind, it would've been like Lanny signing with Edmonton?
Well, KLowe was wrong, of course. (6 Stanley Cup Rings Wrong!)
But if Iginla signed with VCR, it WOULD be like Lanny signing with EDM. Biggest Flame fan favourites, biggest rivals. Puke City, USA.
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:26 PM
|
#73
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miniac
Any one but the Canucks Iggy! 
|
Even the Oilers?
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:27 PM
|
#74
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2
Of course they do. Iginla himself said he hated the Canucks.
|
He was asked a question of which team he hated the most. More than likely when a player is asked that question they pick the arch rival. He pretty much had 2 choices Edmonton or Vancouver. I don't see how he would pick Washington if they only play them once or twice a year.
Basically its a loaded question.
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:27 PM
|
#75
|
Franchise Player
|
Hope he goes to the Canucks just to finally see how committed to Iggy his fans are. He ceased to exist to me when he left town. I can't imagine the reaction to him going to the hated rivals on the west coast.
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:28 PM
|
#76
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
Even the Oilers?
|
Them too haha
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:31 PM
|
#77
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
He was asked a question of which team he hated the most. More than likely when a player is asked that question they pick the arch rival. He pretty much had 2 choices Edmonton or Vancouver. I don't see how he would pick Washington if they only play them once or twice a year.
Basically its a loaded question.
|
And? Usually your most hated team is your rival.
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:33 PM
|
#78
|
Franchise Player
|
If Iggy goes to the Canucks, at the very least I hope he damages that franchise 10x worse then Messier ever did.
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:33 PM
|
#79
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2
Honestly I'd lose all my respect for Iginla if he signed with the Canucks. He'd go from my favorite player to most hated in an instant.
|
What if he scored 50 goals............. on Luongo?
|
|
|
07-02-2013, 10:37 PM
|
#80
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86
=D
First Sundin, then Iginla. Yes, yessssss.
|
Yeah, because Sundin worked out so well.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 AM.
|
|