Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2013, 04:00 PM   #101
cowtown75
Powerplay Quarterback
 
cowtown75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Have to find other players to help us to be big and tough. I've always liked Sarich, but the guy sat out a lot last season, and he isn't making us any tougher from the press box.
True, but I don't think he was voluntarilly sitting out. He is our best hitting D-man no question. I think it's more a case of mis-management via Hartley.

Last edited by cowtown75; 06-19-2013 at 04:29 PM.
cowtown75 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cowtown75 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 04:01 PM   #102
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Management seem to be serious about getting bigger up front and more difficult to play against. Expect them to throw money at one of Clarkson or Horton. Maybe both. They're not going to let a roster of small 21-25 year olds get manhandled as their introduction to the NHL.
I would be alright with throwing money at both of them (if Cammy and Tanguay are gone).

We still to to dress a roster and you need to have pieces that will help the young kids be successful, you don't want to throw the young guys to the wolves like the Oilers and Islanders have done.

I like those two as well since this team needs RWs regardless. We lack NHL and prospect depth in that area.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 04:01 PM   #103
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Management seem to be serious about getting bigger up front and more difficult to play against. Expect them to throw money at one of Clarkson or Horton. Maybe both. They're not going to let a roster of small 21-25 year olds get manhandled as their introduction to the NHL.
I think the Flames will be near the cap again. Probably adding another physical defender as well.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 04:12 PM   #104
TheGrimm
Scoring Winger
 
TheGrimm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerSteve View Post
Unless they trade Stempniak, Sarich, Tanguay and Cammalleri, they don't have roster spots to let the kids play. I'd say 3 of these 4 need to be traded.

And you propose we offer all these kids $5 mill per year contracts so we can stay above the cap floor too? I, for one, do not want to watch a team full of 18 year old kids get smacked around night after night with no veteran leadership and losing confidence with each beating they take.

No Thanks
TheGrimm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to TheGrimm For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 04:16 PM   #105
TheGrimm
Scoring Winger
 
TheGrimm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Exp:
Default

The reality is, we need to ice a competitive team each night and that will mean having veteran players. If we ship out Tangs and Cammi and Stempniak we are dangerously low on experience and we need to replace them with UFA's or other experienced players.

I get that it's fun to have young players come up and see if they can play with the big boys, but I think this season there are some fans who are going to have a harsh reality set in on just how a rebuild works.
TheGrimm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheGrimm For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 04:16 PM   #106
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerSteve View Post
Unless they trade Stempniak, Sarich, Tanguay and Cammalleri, they don't have roster spots to let the kids play. I'd say 3 of these 4 need to be traded.
Your math is wrong. We only really need to trade one of the forwards to make some room on the big team right away. For argument's sake go with Tanguay.

Cammalleri-Stajan-Stempniak
Glencross-Backlund-Hudler
Baertschi-Knight-Horak
Jackman-Reinhart-Bouma
X: Jones, Alui/other young guy

Giordano-Wideman
Brodie-Smith
Butler-Cundari/Sieloff/Wotherspoon/Breen
X: Sarich

That still leaves room for a number of the young players to fight for roster spots and then Cammalleri, Sarich and/or Stempniak can be trade bait at the deadline to make room for more players from the Heat. By that time, the young players that have been up for most of the season should hopefully have a grasp on what they are doing and not need as much attention as the new guys.

Piling on a team full of rookies will not help anything.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 04:19 PM   #107
StrykerSteve
Ass Handler
 
StrykerSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
Your math is wrong. We only really need to trade one of the forwards to make some room on the big team right away. For argument's sake go with Tanguay.

Cammalleri-Stajan-Stempniak
Glencross-Backlund-Hudler
Baertschi-Knight-Horak
Jackman-Reinhart-Bouma
X: Jones, Alui/other young guy

Giordano-Wideman
Brodie-Smith
Butler-Cundari/Sieloff/Wotherspoon/Breen
X: Sarich

That still leaves room for a number of the young players to fight for roster spots and then Cammalleri, Sarich and/or Stempniak can be trade bait at the deadline to make room for more players from the Heat. By that time, the young players that have been up for most of the season should hopefully have a grasp on what they are doing and not need as much attention as the new guys.

Piling on a team full of rookies will not help anything.
I'd rather ice a team of primarily rookies and lose, than lose with a 1st line of Cammy - Stajan - Stempniak.

Either way, this team is brutal. It'll just be more fun to watch the kids play, IMO.
StrykerSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 04:23 PM   #108
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerSteve View Post
I'd rather ice a team of primarily rookies and lose, than lose with a 1st line of Cammy - Stajan - Stempniak.

Either way, this team is brutal. It'll just be more fun to watch the kids play, IMO.
Not sure the team full of rookies would enjoy that though.
_Q_ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to _Q_ For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 04:25 PM   #109
StrykerSteve
Ass Handler
 
StrykerSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
Exp:
Default

They'll enjoy it, and they'll like it too. If they don't, I'll turn this car right around.
StrykerSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to StrykerSteve For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 04:26 PM   #110
cowtown75
Powerplay Quarterback
 
cowtown75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bertuzzied View Post
do you think the Bruins will take our 3 1st rounders for Seguin?
Yes. Would I do it ? hell no.
cowtown75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 04:31 PM   #111
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
I think the Flames will be near the cap again. Probably adding another physical defender as well.
Assuming Kipper retires, the Flames have something like $24 million in cap space, with not many positions to fill.

I'm not sure how they are going to find $24 million worth of free agents to bring in, especially with the team wanting to play young players.

The Flames will not be within $10 million of the salary cap, whether they want to or not, IMO.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 04:35 PM   #112
mrdonkey
Franchise Player
 
mrdonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

I don't think anyone is advocating excising every veteran player off the team for more kids. But you want to keep the guys who have the right kind of attitude and ditch the ones who don't. Guys like Joey Mac, McGrattan, Sarich, Gio - these are the kinds of veteran players that will have a positive influence on the team and want to be a part of the solution. Guys who pout and quit playing when things don't go their way or have a loser mentality need to go - and we all know who those guys are.
mrdonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mrdonkey For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 04:36 PM   #113
cowtown75
Powerplay Quarterback
 
cowtown75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
Assuming Kipper retires, the Flames have something like $24 million in cap space, with not many positions to fill.

I'm not sure how they are going to find $24 million worth of free agents to bring in, especially with the team wanting to play young players.

The Flames will not be within $10 million of the salary cap, whether they want to or not, IMO.
Hello Vinny LeCavlier !
cowtown75 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cowtown75 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 04:49 PM   #114
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowtown75 View Post
Hello Vinny LeCavlier !
I don't know whether ownership would be open to it, but I've suggested that the Flames could compliance buyout other teams players and receive an asset in return.

Say, something like this as an example:

Lecavalier + 2nd rounder - to Calgary

7th rounder (or other garbage) - to TB

Calgary then buys out Lecavalier, essentially buying an extra pick for cash.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 04:51 PM   #115
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
I don't know whether ownership would be open to it, but I've suggested that the Flames could compliance buyout other teams players and receive an asset in return.

Say, something like this as an example:

Lecavalier + 2nd rounder - to Calgary

7th rounder (or other garbage) - to TB

Calgary then buys out Lecavalier, essentially buying an extra pick for cash.
I think taking on that much salary is a massive overpayment for a second rounder.
_Q_ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to _Q_ For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 04:52 PM   #116
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
Teams trade first rounders all the time for productive two way depth at the trade deadline.

Or, trade for him now, get him for the whole year. If Stempniak was being shopped at this year's trade deadline, he would have gotten a first rounder easily. He may have gotten the biggest return of any Flames' trade.
You're terribly overrating Stempniak's value. Feaster barely got a guaranteed first round pick for Iginla because there weren't that many teams willing to move a first round pick. Other guaranteed first round picks moved for a forward was for Pominville. Stempniak had a good season production wise, but he's considered a 2nd line/3rd line guy on a contender.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 04:54 PM   #117
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
I don't know whether ownership would be open to it, but I've suggested that the Flames could compliance buyout other teams players and receive an asset in return.

Say, something like this as an example:

Lecavalier + 2nd rounder - to Calgary

7th rounder (or other garbage) - to TB

Calgary then buys out Lecavalier, essentially buying an extra pick for cash.
That is a very expensive 2nd round pick
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 04:54 PM   #118
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bertuzzied View Post
We need to keep Sarich unless we can get another hitting dman for him.

Unless Feaster somehow knows inside info from the NHL wanting to ban hitting, we are going to get smoked and run over next year.
We don't really need to keep anybody over the age of 26. The Flames should look at all offers that will make us a better team in 2-3 years.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 04:57 PM   #119
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
I don't think anyone is advocating excising every veteran player off the team for more kids. But you want to keep the guys who have the right kind of attitude and ditch the ones who don't. Guys like Joey Mac, McGrattan, Sarich, Gio - these are the kinds of veteran players that will have a positive influence on the team and want to be a part of the solution. Guys who pout and quit playing when things don't go their way or have a loser mentality need to go - and we all know who those guys are.
If you get the right offer, you should look at moving them. Solid veterans can always be acquired later. Espcially guys like Sarich, Joey Mac, and McGratton. We shouldn't move them for the sake of moving, but if a good offer comes along, you go for it.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 05:09 PM   #120
Southside
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Deep South
Exp:
Default

We need to get McGrattan signed. We can't have a young team getting pushed around. At least we can win some battles if not the war.
Southside is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Southside For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:14 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy