Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-25-2012, 02:38 PM   #201
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
Yeah, Prokhorov, who also brought along the anchor tenant that made the whole thing feasible. At the time that happened Nassau was still very much in play. By the time things turned sour in Nassau there was little reason to bring in another partner for Barclays. Heck, by the time Nassau was out of the question Barclays was half finished.
Ratner already owned the Nets, so the anchor tenant was a foregone conclusion. The Russian was brought in because Ratner needed the money. Things were sour in Nassau long before the vote. The Nassau vote was just a formality and everyone knew it was doomed except for Wang.

I guess you could give points to Wang for being loyal to Long Island but as a business man it was bad decision making.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 02:44 PM   #202
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
Ratner already owned the Nets, so the anchor tenant was a foregone conclusion. The Russian was brought in because Ratner needed the money. Things were sour in Nassau long before the vote. The Nassau vote was just a formality and everyone knew it was doomed except for Wang.

I guess you could give points to Wang for being loyal to Long Island but as a business man it was bad decision making.
Things weren't sour in Nassau in 2009, there was a very real possibility that Lighthouse was going to happen, and if it did it would have been a goldmine. That property is virtually the only area of large buildable land remaining in the entire county and Wang was going to do a hell of a lot more than build an arena.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 05:16 PM   #203
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
Things weren't sour in Nassau in 2009, there was a very real possibility that Lighthouse was going to happen, and if it did it would have been a goldmine. That property is virtually the only area of large buildable land remaining in the entire county and Wang was going to do a hell of a lot more than build an arena.
Not true, Wang had given Hemstead an Oct. 2009 deadline to approve the Lighthouse project. They didn't and it was reported as dead. I'd say things had gone sour in 09. All that was left was to try for the arena, and the vote on the arena was a formality as it was a lost cause.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 09:48 PM   #204
Hunter7
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Exp:
Default

According to local press the Isles tixs will rise 25% after the move.
The new arena has 100 luxury boxes.

NHL has said no changes to the team name or jerseys, but I'm guessing we'll get a 3rd jersey with Brooklyn Islanders.

New seats will be added before 2015.Bettman says seating will be 15,015.
Hunter7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 09:56 PM   #205
Hunter7
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
Not true, Wang had given Hemstead an Oct. 2009 deadline to approve the Lighthouse project. They didn't and it was reported as dead. I'd say things had gone sour in 09. All that was left was to try for the arena, and the vote on the arena was a formality as it was a lost cause.
That's not true. Wang never gave the County a deadline on the Lighthouse project.
When the Democrats ran the County, the Republicans opposed the project. Then when the Republicans gained control in the County, the Democrats opposed the privately financed project. Imo neither side wanted the other to get credit for this huge development deal.

The Aug. 2011 vote, was for a 2nd arena proposal. This one a publicly funded proposal. The voters rejected it.
Hunter7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 01:00 AM   #206
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter7 View Post
That's not true. Wang never gave the County a deadline on the Lighthouse project.
When the Democrats ran the County, the Republicans opposed the project. Then when the Republicans gained control in the County, the Democrats opposed the privately financed project. Imo neither side wanted the other to get credit for this huge development deal.

The Aug. 2011 vote, was for a 2nd arena proposal. This one a publicly funded proposal. The voters rejected it.
Here you go.

Quote:
WANG CONSIDERS OPTIONS OUTSIDE LONG ISLAND
October 8, 2009
Copyright 2009 MediaVentures

Long Island, N.Y. - New York Islanders owner Charles Wang says that now that the deadline has expired for progress on his $3.8 billion Lighthouse project that includes a renovation of Nassau Coliseum, he will entertain calls from others who might be interested in hosting the NHL franchise.
http://hockey.ballparks.com/NHL/NewY...s/newindex.htm
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 08:04 AM   #207
robmneilson
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston TX, formerly NYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
Honestly for a lot of those people it will be about the same amount of effort to get to a game. People out east in Suffolk will have a bit of an issue, but if you're in Nassau county (particularly on the south shore) the trip to Barclays via LIRR will be very easy, and there will probably be plenty of parking available at the stations as the day parkers will be clearing out by that time.
That's true, I'll miss going to the games early to park for free, tailgate, and play road hockey though. But the move can't happen soon enough, now they just need to be able to win a game or two.
robmneilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 08:25 AM   #208
Hunter7
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post

Wang's pr pushes meant very little. From 2008-2010/2011, he was scheduling training camps in Canada and preseason games in cities that were trying to acquire an nhl team. All this in an effort to pressure local pols, hoping they'd push thru a slightly scaled down version of his Lighthouse project.

It was only in 2011, that he finally accepted that the partisan pols would not work together and his Lighthopuse project was not going to happen. County Exec. Ed Mangano came up with plan B: a publicly funded stand alone arena. No retail stores, businesses or residential buildings.

Wang's Lighthouse project was a $3 billion - $4 billion project, on a larger scale then Ratner's $1 billion Barclay's Center. Listen to Wang give Ratner props for getting his deal done in that press conference.

There is no way that if County pols approved Wang's Lighthouse project anytime after Oct. 9, 2009, that Wang would have so ' No, thanks. You guys missed a deadline. I'm no longer interested."
Hunter7 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hunter7 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 10:48 AM   #209
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter7 View Post
Wang's pr pushes meant very little. From 2008-2010/2011, he was scheduling training camps in Canada and preseason games in cities that were trying to acquire an nhl team. All this in an effort to pressure local pols, hoping they'd push thru a slightly scaled down version of his Lighthouse project.

It was only in 2011, that he finally accepted that the partisan pols would not work together and his Lighthopuse project was not going to happen. County Exec. Ed Mangano came up with plan B: a publicly funded stand alone arena. No retail stores, businesses or residential buildings.

Wang's Lighthouse project was a $3 billion - $4 billion project, on a larger scale then Ratner's $1 billion Barclay's Center. Listen to Wang give Ratner props for getting his deal done in that press conference.

There is no way that if County pols approved Wang's Lighthouse project anytime after Oct. 9, 2009, that Wang would have so ' No, thanks. You guys missed a deadline. I'm no longer interested."
Valo said things hadn't gone sour in 09, I showed they had. You said there had been no deadline for 09, I showed there was. Now you say it didn't mean anything but looking at the outcome, it obviously did.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 11:27 AM   #210
Hunter7
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
Valo said things hadn't gone sour in 09, I showed they had. You said there had been no deadline for 09, I showed there was. Now you say it didn't mean anything but looking at the outcome, it obviously did.
The so called proof, was from a article dated Oct. 8, 2009.

Below are Wang's comments from Oct. 22, 2009
http://hockey.ballparks.com/NHL/NewY...s/newindex.htm

WANG SAYS REPORTS ARE FALSE
October 22, 2009
Copyright 2009 MediaVentures

Uniondale, N.Y. - New York Islanders owner Charles Wang says reports that he has abandoned plans to develop the Lighthouse project and renovate Nassau Coliseum are false, but they did prompt some calls from town officials indicating they were willing to speed up the process.
In a letter sent to Wang, Town Supervisor Kate Murray argued that modifying the project could resolve some of the town's environmental concerns, "making it possible for the town board to more promptly provide the certainty that you are seeking."
Wang hopes to build a $3.8-billion mixed-use development that would include a $320-million renovation to Nassau Coliseum, along with 42 buildings containing residential, retail and office space. He had set Oct. 3 as a deadline for "certainty," but has not yet received zoning approval from the town.
Wang repeated that he is awaiting a yes or no decision from the town. Wang said that he is continuing to "look at all options," which could include selling or moving the team. But he added: "My heart is still on Long Island. I love Long Island. This is where the Islanders belong. Let's play hockey."
Hunter7 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hunter7 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 02:25 PM   #211
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter7 View Post
The so called proof, was from a article dated Oct. 8, 2009.

Below are Wang's comments from Oct. 22, 2009
http://hockey.ballparks.com/NHL/NewY...s/newindex.htm

WANG SAYS REPORTS ARE FALSE
October 22, 2009
Copyright 2009 MediaVentures

Uniondale, N.Y. - New York Islanders owner Charles Wang says reports that he has abandoned plans to develop the Lighthouse project and renovate Nassau Coliseum are false, but they did prompt some calls from town officials indicating they were willing to speed up the process.
In a letter sent to Wang, Town Supervisor Kate Murray argued that modifying the project could resolve some of the town's environmental concerns, "making it possible for the town board to more promptly provide the certainty that you are seeking."
Wang hopes to build a $3.8-billion mixed-use development that would include a $320-million renovation to Nassau Coliseum, along with 42 buildings containing residential, retail and office space. He had set Oct. 3 as a deadline for "certainty," but has not yet received zoning approval from the town.
Wang repeated that he is awaiting a yes or no decision from the town. Wang said that he is continuing to "look at all options," which could include selling or moving the team. But he added: "My heart is still on Long Island. I love Long Island. This is where the Islanders belong. Let's play hockey."
Even your article says there was a missed deadline. If that wasn't a sign that things were turning sour, considering the outcome, I don't know what else you need?

As for Wang saying all the right things after the deadline, Bettman says all the right things too after the NHLPA misses another deadline. It doesn't mean things haven't turned sour.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 02:04 PM   #212
Fluffy Bunnies
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Exp:
Default

Best thing to ever happen for the Islanders. You know...aside from 4 Stanley Cups.
Fluffy Bunnies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 01:50 PM   #213
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Barclay's center released a picture of how the hockey rink layout would look like... reaction from Isles fans has been mostly negative:



Odd sightlines and a scoreboard that is offcenter.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 01:52 PM   #214
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Barclay's center released a picture of how the hockey rink layout would look like... reaction from Isles fans has been mostly negative:

Odd sightlines and a scoreboard that is offcenter.
It doesn't look awesome but it does look better than what they have now.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 01:52 PM   #215
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

hahaha ... oh Islanders
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 01:54 PM   #216
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Some of the seating is just weird......some seats in the corner will have a fan seated towards center ice while the person beside them is facing the blueline.

No wonder they're not happy.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 01:59 PM   #217
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Wow, who the heck designed that arena's seating? It's horrible. People are facing different angles at random. That one corner section, you'll be looking at half side profiles of other fans seated in the section right beside you.
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 02:00 PM   #218
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Those who aren't happy should be reminded that the view would be much worse if the team had moved to Quebec.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to valo403 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 02:01 PM   #219
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man View Post
Wow, who the heck designed that arena's seating? It's horrible. People are facing different angles at random. That one corner section, you'll be looking at half side profiles of other fans seated in the section right beside you.
It's designed for basketball, and is actually a great place to watch a game.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 02:03 PM   #220
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

People in those angled seats near the corner are literally going to have to shoulder check to see like 25% of the game.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy