06-10-2013, 02:49 PM
|
#5301
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3 Justin 3
They played Lindholm on the wing (for the same reasons as Jankowski) so it would be an easier transition. He is a center.
|
He may not be.
Lots of guys that get shuttled away from center never move back.
Tanguay, Cammalleri, Hall, Seguin. Etc.
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 02:49 PM
|
#5302
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
6 - C Monahan
22 - D McCoshen
28- G Eric Comrie
|
puke
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Canada 02 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-10-2013, 02:54 PM
|
#5303
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada 02
puke
|
Haha, I actually first noticed the one with Nurse, Fucale and McCoshen and thought if that actually happens draft day I will probably take a CP vacation, because this place will be unbearable.
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 02:58 PM
|
#5304
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Hoffner's Draft is my favorite.
6. Monahan
22. Mueller
28 Morrissey
Top line center and a pair of good d-men.
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 02:58 PM
|
#5305
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
Looking at those draft lists it's very apparent that Lindholm is probably the most underrated player in this draft.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 03:03 PM
|
#5306
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja
Looking at those draft lists it's very apparent that Lindholm is probably the most underrated player in this draft.
|
Or maybe Calgarypuck is just overrating him.
In the mock drafts he goes 8th, 9th, or 10th, not sure that is really underrating him.
It is pretty clear that the talent level is pretty even after the top 5.
Last edited by SuperMatt18; 06-10-2013 at 03:05 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-10-2013, 03:35 PM
|
#5307
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Neither here nor there
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Hoffner's Draft is my favorite.
6. Monahan
22. Mueller
28 Morrissey
Top line center and a pair of good d-men.
|
Agreed.....although based on scouting rankings it would make more sense if Mueller and Morrissey were reversed.
__________________
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity" -Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 03:45 PM
|
#5308
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lethbridge
|
I will be very disappointed if the Flames use a 1st round pick on a goalie, as several of these mock drafters seem to think the Flames will do.
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 04:04 PM
|
#5309
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
I'd be ok with the Flames taking a G with their 3rd round pick if they were high on someone though
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 04:09 PM
|
#5310
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayfulGenius
I'd be ok with the Flames taking a G with their 3rd round pick if they were high on someone though
|
Tristan Jarry, if he's still on the board by then.
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 04:34 PM
|
#5311
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Tristan Jarry, if he's still on the board by then.
|
Would rather look at another of the big mobile defensemen in the third round.
I like this goalie as a potential fifth round pick.
8 PATRIK BARTOSAK RED DEER WHL 6' 1.0" 187
__________________
'Skank' Marden: I play hockey and I fornicate, 'cause those are the two most fun things to do in cold weather. - Mystery Alaska
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 05:15 PM
|
#5312
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muffins
Agreed.....although based on scouting rankings it would make more sense if Mueller and Morrissey were reversed.
|
If Feaster really wants to change the culture, wonder if he would select two of Lazar/Hartman/Tompher/De la Rose with our STL/PITT picks, depending who is available at the time of selection. Definite character/grit guys with some offensive upside. Read their profiles on FC in the prospect forum and they seem to be solid guys who are good bets to play in some capacity. Lots of prospects who are listed as boom/bust which scares the bejeezus out of me. Even if they end up on the 3rd/4th line, they seem to be guys who have a high compete level and are able to contribute in some capacity.
These guys seem like players who hate to lose while at the same time be able to contribute in an offensive role in the top 6/9.
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 05:17 PM
|
#5313
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Tristan Jarry, if he's still on the board by then.
|
Young offensive dman - like Subban Jr or Vannelli. OK with reaching a bit in the 3rd round on a player like this but not in the 1st round.
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 05:19 PM
|
#5314
|
Franchise Player
|
I say zero goalies this year. Lets take a one year break from drafting one
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to albertGQ For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-10-2013, 05:34 PM
|
#5315
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ
I say zero goalies this year. Lets take a one year break from drafting one
|
I can understand that notion, but with 9 picks in this draft, I have no problem using one from the third round or later on a goalie.
Heck, I'm hoping that by the draft we even have 10 or 11 picks by adding another pick or two in the top 60....of course, I'm probably setting myself up for disappointment as we'll probably somehow end up dropping a pick or two.
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 05:44 PM
|
#5316
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
|
I guarantee that the Flames will draft a goalie.
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 05:48 PM
|
#5317
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
|
I figure they'll use their fifth rounder on a goalie.
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 05:51 PM
|
#5318
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Enough damn goalies.
We don't even know what we have right NOW, yet.. Everyone is aware of the importance on the position, but Feaster really shouldn't overdo it. There's always a solid tender or two every year.
But the 1st rounders should be limited to big, hulking stay at home d-men, pure snipers, and big two-way centres only. Offensive d-men, "projects", undersized talents, and goalies can come later on..
Last edited by djsFlames; 06-10-2013 at 05:56 PM.
|
|
|
06-10-2013, 06:03 PM
|
#5319
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeway
I guarantee that the Flames will draft a goalie.
|
And they should.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sun For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-10-2013, 06:25 PM
|
#5320
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames
Enough damn goalies.
We don't even know what we have right NOW, yet.. Everyone is aware of the importance on the position, but Feaster really shouldn't overdo it. There's always a solid tender or two every year.
But the 1st rounders should be limited to big, hulking stay at home d-men, pure snipers, and big two-way centres only. Offensive d-men, "projects", undersized talents, and goalies can come later on..
|
I agree. I think the club should have a reservoir of goalies and they do. The thing with goalies it seems, is that you have to let them play NHL games for a stretch to really see what you have. I doubt the sharks would have traded Kipper for so little if he had played a half season as a starter and shown his talent. If they let the best 2-3 prospects rotate in with McDonald they will need a year or more to get a feel for what they have in the system now.
I suppose if the scouts feel there is a steal in net laying around in the later rounds then what's one more kick at the can, but I'm feeling fairly certain they wont draft one in the first round.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:27 PM.
|
|