Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2013, 08:27 AM   #721
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerWilco View Post
It was in 2008 and featured Ozzy, Judas Priest, Serj Tankian, and Testament, along with about 6 other bands. It took me an Hour and half to go to the bathroom and get a beer. I missed two bands. That is how useless Mcmahon'sconcourse is. Anything that has more than an under capacity CFL level of attendance renders the entire concourse completely un-functional. And yes it is an embarrassment when you meet people from out of town at said event.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAz0BJ6cB70
As embarrassing as an event in 2008 headlined by Ozzy and Judas Priest?
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 08:29 AM   #722
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

The odds of Canada being awarded the FIFA World Cup in the next three decades are remote.

2026 - Europe
2030 - Asia/Americas
2034 - Americas/Asia
2038 - Europe
2042 - Misc

The U.S. will almost certainly get the Americas slot. If not, Argentina, Mexico, and Chile would all have better shots than Canada.

I just don't see it happening. Even on a competitive basis alone, Canada has to prove it belongs in the World Cup. Qualifying for the thing might be a good start.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 08:29 AM   #723
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
Not sure. But there is interest in putting a team in Calgary, from both local investors and external ones. As a side note, we should probably be looking at FC Edmonton for any financials on the viability of soccer in Alberta. Rod Proudfoot is in as the new GM, and while the Eddies have not had good financial fortunes due to a few issues (low season ticket sales, lack of viable field with proper seating, unfavorable corporate sponsorship), Proudfoot is the man who turned the Stampeders around in the 1990's. Clarke Field should be getting 3000 extra seats to meet attendance targets for the 2013 season.

Also, the man who built the Edmonton FC club, Joe Petrone, is working full-time in Calgary now to bring an NASL team to the city. Here is a link with an interview with him: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...fessional.html

EDIT: Petrone wants a team in Calgary for the 2014 or 2015 season, and would likely play at McMahon. I think an NASL team is a good measuring stick for how pro soccer would do in that facility, or whether a new one is required that's more suitable.
I'm trying to figure out how those issues, which are MAJOR issues, would somehow not exist in Calgary when they exist in a city with a much stronger soccer history than Calgary. They can't sell season tickets in Edmonton, where professional soccer has actually existed for quite some time, yet it won't be an issue in Calgary?
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 08:34 AM   #724
Bend it like Bourgeois
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BACKCHECK!!! View Post
The city of Calgary has a $52m windfall. How do you think they should spend it? Have your say online!

www.calgary.ca/52million

I suppose there's a lot of people here who will write in:
"Give it to the billionaire owners of the Flames, so they can build 1/20th of their new arena/stadium, to help them rake in money faster than they currently do."

Seriously, I cannot believe there are so many people who seriously think that the best possible use of hundreds of millions of dollars in public funds is to build a new arena for a private company, because the line ups for beer and nachos at the current one are too long.

Hmm.
New MRI scanners at every major hospital? Cardiac intervention suites? New STARS helicopters? More surgical staff to cut wait times? Reducing the environmental impact of the tar sands? Diversifying Calgary's economic base?

Not worth it, man, not when we could be paying Murray Edwards hundreds of millions so he can build a building that holds twice as many mini-donut stands.
Well the day the city spends their money usefully like that I will eat my flames jersey. But the fact that they piss away money all over the place wouldn't make pissing away money on this any better.

It would be fascinating to see the actual economics.
Bend it like Bourgeois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 08:37 AM   #725
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Sorry, would someone be kind enough to summarize the latest here? Quick scan has talks of World Cup, Olympics etc but don't have time to read it all.

Thank You!
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 08:38 AM   #726
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
ualifying for the thing might be a good start.
Screw qualifying, just start giving bags and bags of cash to the right people at FIFA like Qatar did. If the world's worst place to play soccer in July can do it, so can we!
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-17-2013, 08:38 AM   #727
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
Yup, Canada would still have to beat out a US bid, and lets consider this:

The US would probably have all 12 of their stadia larger than the largest one Canada would offer. Quite literally, the US would have twice as many tickets to sell. The average attendance could probably be 90,000 per game in the US, if they wanted to.
Yep, they could quite easily play in 3 100,000+ stadiums (Michigan Stadium, Ohio Stadium, Darrell K Royal–Texas Memorial Stadium would be the most likely of the existing stadiums) and would have their choice of multiple 80,000+ stadiums (Rose Bowl, LA Coliseum, or it's replacement, MetLife, FedEx, Arrowhead and Cowboys Stadium, among others).

For Canada to host a World Cup there would need to be a massive stadium building spree, and there would be virtually no purpose for pretty much every single one of those stadiums after the World Cup. It would be one of the most absurd spending sprees imaginable, and that's without even considering other associated infrastructure upgrades.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 08:45 AM   #728
RogerWilco
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
As embarrassing as an event in 2008 headlined by Ozzy and Judas Priest?
The concourse and taking a hour and a half to get a beer was an embarrassment.
RogerWilco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 09:05 AM   #729
RedMileDJ
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: blow me
Exp:
Default

I have it on good word that the Flames organization will announce something either today or next week.

A mod is welcome to PM me for my source. I would rather not reveal it here.

They are eyeing 4 possible locations: 2 within the city, 1 on Stampede Park and 1 outside the city.

That's all I got.
RedMileDJ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to RedMileDJ For This Useful Post:
Old 05-17-2013, 09:16 AM   #730
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red-Mile-DJ View Post
I have it on good word that the Flames organization will announce something either today or next week.

A mod is welcome to PM me for my source. I would rather not reveal it here.

They are eyeing 4 possible locations: 2 within the city, 1 on Stampede Park and 1 outside the city.

That's all I got.
Sweet. Hopefully not outside the city, thats just insane.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 05-17-2013, 09:17 AM   #731
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red-Mile-DJ View Post
They are eyeing 4 possible locations: 2 within the city, 1 on Stampede Park and 1 outside the city.
That was said million of year's ago. In fact, KK factored out any outside of city centre.

I would figure they're set on one specific spot at this point.
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 09:18 AM   #732
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red-Mile-DJ View Post
I have it on good word that the Flames organization will announce something either today or next week.

A mod is welcome to PM me for my source. I would rather not reveal it here.

They are eyeing 4 possible locations: 2 within the city, 1 on Stampede Park and 1 outside the city.

That's all I got.
That outside the city location better just be a negotiation ploy, because if they are seriously considering it, I will truely believe this management team is as dumb as all the haters say they are.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
Old 05-17-2013, 09:18 AM   #733
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red-Mile-DJ View Post
I have it on good word that the Flames organization will announce something either today or next week.

A mod is welcome to PM me for my source. I would rather not reveal it here.

They are eyeing 4 possible locations: 2 within the city, 1 on Stampede Park and 1 outside the city.

That's all I got.
When you say withing and outside the city, are you meaning the city core/center or city limits?

If it is outside the city then they should put it in Lethbridge so I can go to more games. I'd most def get season tickets if that were the case.
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 09:20 AM   #734
BACKCHECK!!!
First Line Centre
 
BACKCHECK!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: TEXAS!!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red-Mile-DJ View Post
I have it on good word that the Flames organization will announce something either today or next week.

A mod is welcome to PM me for my source. I would rather not reveal it here.

They are eyeing 4 possible locations: 2 within the city, 1 on Stampede Park and 1 outside the city.

That's all I got.
Ladies and gentlemen, your 2016 Tsuu T'ina FLAAAAMES!!!
__________________
I am a lunatic whose world revolves around hockey and Oilers hate.
BACKCHECK!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 09:35 AM   #735
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red-Mile-DJ View Post
I have it on good word that the Flames organization will announce something either today or next week.

A mod is welcome to PM me for my source. I would rather not reveal it here.

They are eyeing 4 possible locations: 2 within the city, 1 on Stampede Park and 1 outside the city.

That's all I got.
I don't think we should get that excited about the potential announcement in the next few days.

I can't see anything concrete being announced before the civic election. Otherwise it would become the central issue of the the mayoral race. Not sure if Nenshi would want to open up that can of worms at this point.
_Q_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 09:36 AM   #736
RedMileDJ
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: blow me
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joborule View Post
That was said million of year's ago.
I'm just passing on what was told to me. My source was only told this in passing. It wasn't a huge specific conversation.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff View Post
When you say withing and outside the city, are you meaning the city core/center or city limits?
I don't know specifically.

The information I posted is exactly how it was presented to my source. Was just a quick mention, but from a VERY reliable person.
RedMileDJ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RedMileDJ For This Useful Post:
Old 05-17-2013, 11:23 AM   #737
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

I don't agree at all with having to beat out the US for a WC Finals bid. I think odds are that when Canada does host one, it will be co-hosted with the US. We will never meet the stadium requirments without a crazy dictator running the country or a massive population spike.

A 40,000 person stadium is too big for MLS, and it is stupid to build a purpose built 40,000 person soccer stadium. I'd much rather have a 20,000 person stadium.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 11:31 AM   #738
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan View Post
I don't agree at all with having to beat out the US for a WC Finals bid. I think odds are that when Canada does host one, it will be co-hosted with the US. We will never meet the stadium requirments without a crazy dictator running the country or a massive population spike.

A 40,000 person stadium is too big for MLS, and it is stupid to build a purpose built 40,000 person soccer stadium. I'd much rather have a 20,000 person stadium.
Co-hosted bids have been frowned upon by FIFA, both Spain/Portugal and Belgium/Netherlands were knocked for it in the latest round of bidding. If Canada were to co-host with the US I'd be pretty surprised to see Calgary make the list anyways, Toronto and Vancouver would be the obvious candidates and it would seem unlikely that Calgary would bump any of the major US cities down the list. We are talking 20 years down the road here though.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 11:54 AM   #739
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

This World Cup stuff has been quite the massive de-rail, so I have no choice but to contribute to it.

Canada hosting the World Cup would be ridiculous essentially on almost all fronts.

We're ranked 80th in the world, behind such powerhouses like Uzbekistan, Sierra Leone and Equitorial Guinea. I suppose the only reason we'd be a viable candidate is economic power and being a nice country, and I suppose it's probably the only way in hell Canada ever qualifies for World Cup anyway (I think we've qualified like once or twice in history and that largely is due to our soft pool, pretty sure we've never won a game at World Cup).

It would be sort of a slap in the face to the rest of the world that actually like, you know, cares about the sport (sorry to the few of you here that do...).

It'd sort of be like if the Dominican Republic was awarded the Winter Olympics.

Last edited by Mr.Coffee; 05-17-2013 at 11:57 AM.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 11:59 AM   #740
jkstuart12
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
This World Cup stuff has been quite the massive de-rail, so I have no choice but to contribute to it.

Canada hosting the World Cup would be ridiculous essentially on almost all fronts.

We're ranked 80th in the world, behind such powerhouses like Uzbekistan, Sierra Leone and Equitorial Guinea. I suppose the only reason we'd be a viable candidate is economic power and being a nice country, and I suppose it's probably the only way in hell Canada ever qualifies for World Cup anyway (I think we've qualified like once or twice in history and that largely is due to our soft pool, pretty sure we've never won a game at World Cup).

It would be sort of a slap in the face to the rest of the world that actually like, you know, cares about the sport (sorry to the few of you here that do...).

It'd sort of be like if the Dominican Republic was awarded the Winter Olympics.

Qatar is hosting the World Cup in 2022. They're currently ranked 101st in the world. I think economic power has a much greater influence than soccer talent.
jkstuart12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to jkstuart12 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:36 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy