View Poll Results: Which C to choose?
|
Lindholm
|
  
|
327 |
48.30% |
Monahan
|
  
|
319 |
47.12% |
Someone Else (Other C, Not a C, Etc)
|
  
|
31 |
4.58% |
05-12-2013, 09:36 PM
|
#781
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
Fair enough. I don't agree that Nichushkin is significantly more likely to be a franchise player than Lindholm or Monahan. IMO centres are much more likely to end up as franchise players. How many franchise wingers are there in the NHL and would you want to build around that player?
|
I can think of at least one haha, and look how that turned out! It was awesome!
Selanne would be one. But in his prime he was part of an incredible duo with Karyia.
|
|
|
05-12-2013, 09:37 PM
|
#782
|
Franchise Player
|
Regarding Nichushkin, I should add that if Tampa does NOT take him I think the next team to take him would be New Jersey at 9. Buffalo is a team that could package up 16 and 8 plus more to Tampa for 3.
|
|
|
05-12-2013, 09:50 PM
|
#783
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Is TB's head scout's opinion out there on the Internet SCH or did you hear that through other avenues? Love to see that quote.
|
|
|
05-12-2013, 11:09 PM
|
#784
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
Is TB's head scout's opinion out there on the Internet SCH or did you hear that through other avenues? Love to see that quote.
|
Here's the quote that gives him pretty high praise.
[QUOTE]What the Lightning needs to know: Does Nichushkin want to play in the NHL?
That is all that matters because Nichushkin is so talented with so much upside, Tampa Bay might be willing to wait for him to play out his KHL deal.
"Huge, with all kinds of talent," said Lightning head scout Al Murray, who critiqued his top draftable players in alphabetical order so as not to reveal the team's intentions. "He's big. He's a tremendous skater. He's got individual one-on-one skills with the puck."
About Nichushkin's performance at February's 5 Nations under-18 tournament, Murray said, "That's maybe the most dominant performance I've ever seen at a tournament. He absolutely took over. He was a combination of (Alex) Ovechkin and (Evgeni) Malkin. He was in on the forecheck. He was finishing checks. He was making plays. He scored big goals. He never quit on a shift, and he was just spectacular."
/QUOTE]
http://www.tampabay.com/sports/hocke...ilemma/2120464
|
|
|
05-12-2013, 11:49 PM
|
#785
|
In the Sin Bin
|
http://lightning.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=669501
That link has his description of all the prospects he reviewed
Barkov, Drouin, Jones, MacKinnon, Nichushkin (in alphabetical order)
Interesting to get his descriptions. Still want Barkov or MacKinnon out of this draft, doubt we'll be able to accomplish trading up but it could be a great move if Feaster pulls it off. At least we get our pick of some pretty great prospects at 6.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-16-2013, 10:52 AM
|
#786
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
ISS Hockey @ISShockey
ISS Top 30
#5 Sean Monahan @Monahan20
Big bodied, versatile Foward. Lethal scoring ability & awareness in all zones. Leads by example.
8:07 AM - 15 May 2013
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 10:53 AM
|
#787
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
ISS Hockey @ISShockey
ISS Top 30
#5 Sean Monahan @Monahan20
Big bodied, versatile Foward. Lethal scoring ability & awareness in all zones. Leads by example.
8:07 AM - 15 May 2013
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 10:57 AM
|
#788
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoFlamesGo1989
ISS Hockey @ISShockey
ISS Top 30
#5 Sean Monahan @Monahan20
Big bodied, versatile Foward. Lethal scoring ability & awareness in all zones. Leads by example.
8:07 AM - 15 May 2013
|
i thought ISS had him ranked at #9? Maybe i am getting ISS confused with another agency.
Watching playoff hockey and a big center playing well in all 3 zones is a must.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-16-2013, 11:01 AM
|
#789
|
Franchise Player
|
I've noted this before, but worth mentioning again, Yzerman has drafted 5 Russians in his two drafts, including two in the 1st round (one was playing in the CHL).
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 11:01 AM
|
#790
|
In the Sin Bin
|
That's weird. Monahan is at #9 in their list.
http://www.tsn.ca/draftcentre/feature/?id=92324
1. SETH JONES
2. NATE MACKINNON
3. JONATHAN DROUIN
4. VALERY NICHUSHKIN
5. SASHA BARKOV
6. DARNELL NURSE
7. ELIAS LINDHOLM
8. NIKITA ZADOROV
9. SEAN MONAHAN
10. BO HORVAT
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 11:02 AM
|
#791
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
i thought ISS had him ranked at #9? Maybe i am getting ISS confused with another agency.
Watching playoff hockey and a big center playing well in all 3 zones is a must.
|
They did. They had Barkov at 5 and it sound like him they're describing in that tweet.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 11:03 AM
|
#792
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
That's weird. Monahan is at #9 in their list.
http://www.tsn.ca/draftcentre/feature/?id=92324
1. SETH JONES
2. NATE MACKINNON
3. JONATHAN DROUIN
4. VALERY NICHUSHKIN
5. SASHA BARKOV
6. DARNELL NURSE
7. ELIAS LINDHOLM
8. NIKITA ZADOROV
9. SEAN MONAHAN
10. BO HORVAT
|
#5 must be for NA skaters
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fighting Banana Slug For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-16-2013, 11:05 AM
|
#793
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
That's weird. Monahan is at #9 in their list.
http://www.tsn.ca/draftcentre/feature/?id=92324
1. SETH JONES
2. NATE MACKINNON
3. JONATHAN DROUIN
4. VALERY NICHUSHKIN
5. SASHA BARKOV
6. DARNELL NURSE
7. ELIAS LINDHOLM
8. NIKITA ZADOROV
9. SEAN MONAHAN
10. BO HORVAT
|
From that list, maybe ISS has him as the #5 North American Skater?
Jones
Mackinnon
Drouin
Nurse
Monahan
Edit: Just beaten to it
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 11:42 AM
|
#794
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
http://lightning.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=669501
That link has his description of all the prospects he reviewed
Barkov, Drouin, Jones, MacKinnon, Nichushkin (in alphabetical order)
Interesting to get his descriptions. Still want Barkov or MacKinnon out of this draft, doubt we'll be able to accomplish trading up but it could be a great move if Feaster pulls it off. At least we get our pick of some pretty great prospects at 6.
|
Is it me or does anyone else get the feeling he feels Jones is a little overrated by his evaluation?
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 11:53 AM
|
#795
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Is it me or does anyone else get the feeling he feels Jones is a little overrated by his evaluation?
|
I would tend to agree, although my viewings of Seth Jones were limited to the finals against the Oil Kings. He just looks too gentle, so he's bang on with the Pronger comparisons being ridiculous.
I'd be scared if we picked him at number 1, but since the Avs are there, he's going 1st for sure. If it were the Panthers or the Lightning ahead of the Avs, it wouldn't surprise me to see Seth Jones go 3rd.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 12:02 PM
|
#796
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
I would tend to agree, although my viewings of Seth Jones were limited to the finals against the Oil Kings. He just looks too gentle, so he's bang on with the Pronger comparisons being ridiculous.
I'd be scared if we picked him at number 1, but since the Avs are there, he's going 1st for sure. If it were the Panthers or the Lightning ahead of the Avs, it wouldn't surprise me to see Seth Jones go 3rd.
|
I agree, also. It's very rare that the first defenceman taken in a draft ends up being the best defenceman in the draft (much more rare than the first forward taken being the best forward, which happens regularly).
And even in the rare case that he does -- Erik Johnson as an example -- it's still questionable whether it makes sense to take the player that high. I'm sure if the Blues could do that draft again they would opt for someone like Toews, Staal, Backstrom, Kessel, Giroux, etc.
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 12:06 PM
|
#797
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
i thought ISS had him ranked at #9? Maybe i am getting ISS confused with another agency.
Watching playoff hockey and a big center playing well in all 3 zones is a must.
|
that tweet was from Dec 12th; in fact, when GoFlamesGo1989 first posted it, the date said Dec 12, not May 15. Weird that it changed
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 12:17 PM
|
#798
|
First Line Centre
|
If Tampa are in the mindset to take Nichushkin 3rd overall it would make a lot of sense for them to drop to #6 & recoup another asset. Quite unlikely that he's taken before #6. Mackinnon, Drouin or Barkov would be a home run pick at #3 for Feaster.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FlameZilla For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-16-2013, 12:55 PM
|
#799
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla
If Tampa are in the mindset to take Nichushkin 3rd overall it would make a lot of sense for them to drop to #6 & recoup another asset. Quite unlikely that he's taken before #6. Mackinnon, Drouin or Barkov would be a home run pick at #3 for Feaster.
|
If they really like Nichushkin they would be best served to pick him at #3 as there is no garantee that Preds or Hurricanes will pass him over.
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 12:56 PM
|
#800
|
Franchise Player
|
Yeah, if they really think he's the guy, dropping 3 places is risky. I still don't see why they just wouldn't take Drouin though.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 PM.
|
|