Kerry Fraser on tsn had a great analysis of the hit and why it was legal. Good to see it broken down to explain the point. I would link it but I'm on my phone
The Following User Says Thank You to cznTiburon For This Useful Post:
Alright first post of the night and it's about the hit. I didn't think it was that bad. It happened so dam fast. I think the bleeding was from the impact his head took when he hit the ice. I feel sorry for the guy but I thought the hit was clean. Might get roasted for this but it seems the Hab player made a good play. Or maybe I've been drinking too much.
I guess I feel better about not giving any attention to that rag.
I heard something about a hearing? Obviously, it's a very unfortunate situation for Eller and the Habs, but I simply don't see anything wrong with the hit. I will not be pleased if there is any further discipline, like just about anything else I find it hard to disagree with MacLean on this issue.
__________________
Quote:
Somewhere Leon Trotsky is an Oilers fan, because who better demonstrates his philosophy of the permanent revolution?
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Not sure why the NHL has called a hearing. The whole panel on TSN called it a clean hit. To me it was more of a suicide pass that put Ellers in bad situation that resulted in his injuries. I would be very surprised if the NHL deems it a hit worthy of a suspension.
Either way, I have to feel bad for Diaz being hounded by the media after the game. He most likely realizes it was a poor decision and would feel like total #### without his face being all over every sports telecast covering the game.
__________________
Quote:
Somewhere Leon Trotsky is an Oilers fan, because who better demonstrates his philosophy of the permanent revolution?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to OffsideSpecialist For This Useful Post: