Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which C to choose?
Lindholm 327 48.30%
Monahan 319 47.12%
Someone Else (Other C, Not a C, Etc) 31 4.58%
Voters: 677. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-30-2013, 04:29 PM   #381
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
I wouldn't want us to pick Nichushkin if Monahan or Lindholm are available. Take him with the Blues pick if he's still there (which he won't be)

If we want to swing for the fences, I say pick Petan. Although a different type of risk (size vs Russian), he's still a risk
Petan with what pick? I wouldn't mind a shot on him with the Penguins' pick but depending on who's available (and of course where it lands) I think I wouldn't want to see the Blues' pick used on him.

But go for both, a Nichushkin-Petan-Gaudreau line would be hilarious.

Or grab Gauthier and make Gaudreau really look small.

Last edited by Oling_Roachinen; 04-30-2013 at 04:32 PM.
Oling_Roachinen is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 04:31 PM   #382
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
I would mind us picking Nichushkin with our 2nd pick (wherever that may be)
A top 5 talent falling past 20 I think would require several GM's to lose their jobs. Maybe the Pittsburgh+St.Louis pick could be used to move up enough to grab him if he still falls pretty heavily into that early teen area.
Oling_Roachinen is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 04:33 PM   #383
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
A top 5 talent falling past 20 I think would require several GM's to lose their jobs. Maybe the Pittsburgh+St.Louis pick could be used to move up enough to grab him if he still falls pretty heavily into that early teen area.
Yup, thats why I specified wherever the 2nd pick may be, as it'd likely require us to move up.
AC is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 04:45 PM   #384
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
Petan with what pick? I wouldn't mind a shot on him with the Penguins' pick but depending on who's available (and of course where it lands) I think I wouldn't want to see the Blues' pick used on him.

But go for both, a Nichushkin-Petan-Gaudreau line would be hilarious.

Or grab Gauthier and make Gaudreau really look small.
Either the Blues or Pens pick. Obviously not ours

There is a minimal difference between the Blues and Pens picks. Right now, they're 25 and 29

You'd take a risk with Petan at 29 but not 25? Those four spots really mean that much?
albertGQ is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 04:49 PM   #385
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Some people are saying on HF that Nashville is high on Lindholm and if it's true that Carolina is high on Monahan then that gives us Sasha Bakrov....I would LOVE it if that happened.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 04:55 PM   #386
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
Either the Blues or Pens pick. Obviously not ours

There is a minimal difference between the Blues and Pens picks. Right now, they're 25 and 29

You'd take a risk with Petan at 29 but not 25? Those four spots really mean that much?
Blues' would be 23 (behind Boston and then the 6 division winners). And there's probably about as good of a chance that it falls below that as there is of it climbing above. So yeah, if the Blues' pick ends up in that 21-23 range I think I would avoid Petan.

Of course if it climbs up to 27 or better there's very little difference between the picks.
Oling_Roachinen is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:00 PM   #387
TopChed
Powerplay Quarterback
 
TopChed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

Bleacher Report's mock draft has Calgary taking Lindholm, after Nichushkin goes 5th. They have Monahan going 10th to Dallas.

link
TopChed is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:01 PM   #388
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Barkov @ 6? Dream scenario!
dammage79 is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:09 PM   #389
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Barkov @ 6? Dream scenario!
Crazier things have happened before. Cam Fowler dropped to 12th remember?
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:15 PM   #390
FlamesFan94
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Default

I can't say I'm educated enough to make any sort of prediction, but I think Feaster picks Monahan. For whatever reason, I think the fourth franchise player Feaster was talking about is him. Size, faceoffs, offensive talent, leadership, physicality, and not to mention high hockey IQ which he loves. Never mind the fact he's Canadian. As for my preference, I need to do more reading, and personal scouting to make an informed choice. Either way I think we will come away with a great player.
FlamesFan94 is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:21 PM   #391
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
Crazier things have happened before. Cam Fowler dropped to 12th remember?
Gormley right behind him. Couturier falling to 8th, Forsberg making his way to 11th last year. I would say those would have been about as surprising as Barkov would be available at 6th this year. All it would take is a team being confident Nichushkin is making his way over to the NA and another team deciding they need a defender like Nurse or something.
Oling_Roachinen is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:27 PM   #392
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidney Crosby's Hat View Post
Forsberg was also taken at 6.
What made him great was he finished his career averaging almost 1 penalty minute per game, raising that to over 1 during the playoffs.
the2bears is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:28 PM   #393
Mitch
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Mitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

I would take Nichushkin over Monahan.
Mitch is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Mitch For This Useful Post:
Old 04-30-2013, 05:30 PM   #394
Miniac
#1 Goaltender
 
Miniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch View Post
I would take Nichushkin over Monahan.
Would you take Nichushkin over Lindholm?
Miniac is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:30 PM   #395
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

I feel sorry for whomever we draft 6th overall. There is going to be intense pressure from the fans and media to live up to the hype that will be expected from him. I just hope he has the mental toughness to ride it out.
__________________
Dion is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:32 PM   #396
Clever_Iggy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
I feel sorry for whomever we draft 6th overall. There is going to be intense pressure from the fans and media to live up to the hype that will be expected from him. I just hope he has the mental toughness to ride it out.
Agreed. Another reason why I would want to keep all 3 first rounders or keep 2 of at least 3 (package them together to move up). Spread the pressure over multiple first rounders.
Clever_Iggy is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:36 PM   #397
Mitch
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Mitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miniac View Post
Would you take Nichushkin over Lindholm?
Nope, even though I feel Nichushkin is the better player.
Mitch is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:41 PM   #398
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

I am going to stick with my initial preference from last week
Sean Monahan is the guy no question about it.

http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...62#post4220062

Quote:
Monahan is who i like the most of the above. 2nd year player Gold medal with under 17's. 31g 78 pts with the below average 67's. Leads all his team mates by an impressive 30pts so he is the guy leading by example and not benefiting from have a good set up man or another finisher.
__________________

Last edited by Stay Golden; 04-30-2013 at 05:44 PM.
Stay Golden is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 05:50 PM   #399
Henry Fool
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch View Post
I would take Nichushkin over Monahan.
If I had to guess based on reports, I'd say that Nichushkin goes before Monahan and that he'll be higher on the Flames' list as well. McKenzie says that him being Russian is the only reason the top-4 isn't a top-5. I suspect the Flames will pick Lindholm.
Henry Fool is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Henry Fool For This Useful Post:
Old 04-30-2013, 06:08 PM   #400
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the2bears View Post
What made him great was he finished his career averaging almost 1 penalty minute per game, raising that to over 1 during the playoffs.
Why is having more PIMs a good thing?
I find it very odd that so many posters put PIMs on a pedestal.
I want my stars on the ice. Not in the penalty box.
albertGQ is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy