View Poll Results: Which C to choose?
|
Lindholm
|
  
|
327 |
48.30% |
Monahan
|
  
|
319 |
47.12% |
Someone Else (Other C, Not a C, Etc)
|
  
|
31 |
4.58% |
04-30-2013, 03:04 PM
|
#361
|
Franchise Player
|
Based on my limited analysis of youtube videos you guys are all wrong and we should draft Connor McDavid.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to corporatejay For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:07 PM
|
#362
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
Just a question, but does anyone know where one could find those vote results? It would be interesting to see. Bo Horvat is supposed to be a great faceoff player and could potentially be there with the St. Louis pick, although it might be a bit of a long shot that he isn't taken earlier (I have seen him ranked anywhere from 10th to 24th).
|
http://www.ontariohockeyleague.com/a...es-poll/140462
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:08 PM
|
#363
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swayze11
You will be surprised how people take comparisons. If you are going to compare someones style of play, at least set expectations in a realistic way.
For example: People compare Monahan to Toews. Why not say Ryan O'Reilly - obtainable expectation.
|
Because it is not fun to hope for Ryan O'Reilly.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:16 PM
|
#364
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
|
Here's the West where Horvat plays:
http://www.ontariohockeyleague.com/a...e-coaches-poll
Domi gets 2nd in best playmaker
Horvat is 2nd in faceoffs and 1st in shotblocker
Horvat is a big gritty centre (not a fighter though) if that's your desire. Offensive upside is the question there.
Last edited by PeteMoss; 04-30-2013 at 03:20 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:30 PM
|
#365
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I'd be happy with either guy. Both play a strong two-way game with great offensive upside.
I think I would lean more to Monahan because of his size-advantage and leadership qualities. He has been team captain at every level. But I am not the scouts who get paid to watch these guys so I won't flip out either way
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:38 PM
|
#366
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
How would you guys feel if both were on the board when the Flames pick and we drafted Nichushkin instead?
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:40 PM
|
#367
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
Because it is not fun to hope for Ryan O'Reilly.
|
If Monahan were to become as good as ROR we should be thrilled.
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:40 PM
|
#368
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja
How would you guys feel if both were on the board when the Flames pick and we drafted Nichushkin instead?
|
frustrated.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Icon For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:41 PM
|
#369
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver :(
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja
How would you guys feel if both were on the board when the Flames pick and we drafted Nichushkin instead?
|
Honestly I would be so pissed off I wouldn't even know what to do...
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:43 PM
|
#370
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja
How would you guys feel if both were on the board when the Flames pick and we drafted Nichushkin instead?
|
For me I would not be that upset because I think his intentions are to play in the NHL in two years and this guy could very well end up being the best player in the draft. If it were not for the Russia factor and the factor he is going back to the KHL for two more years I have zero doubt this guy would be one of the top 2 picks in the draft.
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:44 PM
|
#371
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja
How would you guys feel if both were on the board when the Flames pick and we drafted Nichushkin instead?
|
Sick to my stomach
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:50 PM
|
#372
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja
How would you guys feel if both were on the board when the Flames pick and we drafted Nichushkin instead?
|
Like a Flames fan - typical.
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:51 PM
|
#373
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja
How would you guys feel if both were on the board when the Flames pick and we drafted Nichushkin instead?
|
Fine, I would guess they are know Nik is coming over and wouldn't get burned i.e. Tom Erixon
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 04:00 PM
|
#374
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier
Fine, I would guess they are know Nik is coming over and wouldn't get burned i.e. Tom Erixon
|
I'd hope that with any draft selection (including Erixon), you would be figuring that out in the pre-draft interviews.
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 04:07 PM
|
#375
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
So after hearing how Lindholm is Forsberg why will he be available at #6?
|
Forsberg was also taken at 6.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sidney Crosby's Hat For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-30-2013, 04:11 PM
|
#376
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon
I'd hope that with any draft selection (including Erixon), you would be figuring that out in the pre-draft interviews.
|
A lot can change in two years though
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 04:15 PM
|
#377
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidney Crosby's Hat
Forsberg was also taken at 6. 
|
Which means Drouin should project to be Pat Falloon.
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 04:16 PM
|
#378
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja
How would you guys feel if both were on the board when the Flames pick and we drafted Nichushkin instead?
|
I'd be super fine with that. Arguably in competition with the top 4 for in potential, I see no reason to freak out. Might be a bit more of a gamble but worth it if he reaches a higher upside, And he's played some center so that totally counts.
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 04:21 PM
|
#379
|
Franchise Player
|
I wouldn't want us to pick Nichushkin if Monahan or Lindholm are available. Take him with the Blues pick if he's still there (which he won't be)
If we want to swing for the fences, I say pick Petan. Although a different type of risk (size vs Russian), he's still a risk
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 04:26 PM
|
#380
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
I wouldn't mind us picking Nichushkin with our 2nd pick (wherever that may be) as it would mean the Flames met with him and had a good enough impression to take the risk. But I agree, you take Lindholm or Monahan, or Barkov if he miraculously falls.
I'm leaning towards Lindholm, but wouldn't be upset if they took Monahan.
Last edited by AC; 04-30-2013 at 04:33 PM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.
|
|