| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 03:07 AM | #41 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Super Nintendo Chalmers  I didn't count '93. Maybe you should check your dates. |  
Wow, okay 1993-94. Congratulations.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 03:55 AM | #42 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jacks  Wow, okay 1993-94. Congratulations. |  
Why be snide when you were wrong? All he did did was correct you, you should have double checked your facts at that point before reiterating your point.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 07:02 AM | #43 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Calgary, Alberta      | 
 
			
			Canucks in 6. 
 Sharks are too old and slow.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 07:44 AM | #44 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Vancouver, B.C      | 
 
			
			Both teams dont impress me. The Canucks are limping into the playoffs and haven't played a meaningful game in quite some time. They do have some talent and can string together a few good wins but this team is simply not that good. They will only go as far as Shneider will take them, second round tops. I think the Sharks have a great chance at winning the series.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 08:18 AM | #45 |  
	| Celebrated Square Root Day | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef  Why be snide when you were wrong? All he did did was correct you, you should have double checked your facts at that point before reiterating your point. |  
Plus, it's a very cherry picked stat, to begin with. Out of the second round twice means conference finals. I haven't looked it up, but I'm willing to bet that most of the NHL hasn't made it to the conference finals more than twice since '93.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 08:40 AM | #46 |  
	| Farm Team Player 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2003 Exp:       | 
 
			
			Canucks in 6.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 08:49 AM | #47 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Neityer team appears capable of winning the cup, but based on season series and general hate for the Nucks I'll pick SJ in 6.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 09:39 AM | #48 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			san jose in 4
		 
				__________________"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to killer_carlson For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 09:48 AM | #49 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Screw the nucks.
 however, i'd be shocked if the sharks take this series, they just don't strike much fear as an opponent.
 
 this will be the last season we will see marleau/thornton/boyle/havlat all together as sharks.  Hope they play their guts out and shock the nhl by winning this thing.
 
 unfortunately, i could also see a fairy tale scenario where schnieder can't play and luongo becomes lights out for the nucks.  that would suck.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 09:59 AM | #50 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Lethbridge      | 
 
			
			Probably the best choice out of LA, St. Louis and SJ for the Canucks to face but still have to expect them to lose.
 SJ in 6
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 10:00 AM | #51 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by flameswin  Plus, it's a very cherry picked stat, to begin with. Out of the second round twice means conference finals. I haven't looked it up, but I'm willing to bet that most of the NHL hasn't made it to the conference finals more than twice since '93. |  
Including 1994, there have been 18 seasons - so 72 spots in the conference finals or 2.4 per team on average.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
 
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 10:04 AM | #53 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Huntingwhale  Battle of the aquatic sea animals  |  
It's the fish vs mammal debate all over again
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 10:09 AM | #54 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Enoch Root  Including 1994, there have been 18 seasons - so 72 spots in the conference finals or 2.4 per team on average. |  
Colorado/Detroit really skew that
 
Western Finals since 1994
 
Detroit 8 
Colorado 6 
Dallas 4 
San Jose 3 
Chicago 3 
Anaheim 3 
Vancouver 2 
Toronto 1 
St.Louis 1 
Minnesota 1 
Calgary 1 
Phoenix 1 
Edmonton 1 
LA 1
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 10:13 AM | #55 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf  Colorado/Detroit really skew that
 Western Finals since 1994
 
 Detroit 8
 Colorado 6
 Dallas 4
 San Jose 3
 Chicago 3
 Anaheim 3
 Vancouver 2
 Toronto 1
 St.Louis 1
 Minnesota 1
 Calgary 1
 Phoenix 1
 Edmonton 1
 LA 1
 |  
Of course there is always going to be a couple teams in any 20 year period that really dominated). My point was simply that 2.4 is the average expectation, so to say they only made it twice is, well, putting a slant on it.
  
Edit: nm
		 
				 Last edited by Enoch Root; 04-28-2013 at 10:41 AM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 10:18 AM | #56 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja  Are you actually serious? |  
this version of the Sharks have always done well against this version of the Canucks except the 1 series in 2011
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 10:25 AM | #57 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef  Why be snide when you were wrong? All he did did was correct you, you should have double checked your facts at that point before reiterating your point. |  
But he didn't correct me, he pointed out that I was wrong (twice) without saying why. 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by flameswin  Plus, it's a very cherry picked stat, to begin with. Out of the second round twice means conference finals. I haven't looked it up, but I'm willing to bet that most of the NHL hasn't made it to the conference finals more than twice since '93. |  
The original comment was that the Canucks "knows how to win when it's crunch time".
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 10:33 AM | #58 |  
	| Scoring Winger 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			Sharks in 5.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 11:33 AM | #59 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback | 
 
			
			Canucks in 6.
		 
				__________________  CPHL Dallas Stars |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-28-2013, 11:40 AM | #60 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Salmon with Arms      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Enoch Root  It's the fish vs mammal debate all over again |  
Oh god. Not this again! Next will be the ossified bone vs cartlilaginous skeleton vertebrates superiority pissing match
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:22 PM. | 
 
 
 |