04-28-2013, 09:50 AM
|
#21
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I'm not sure why Carolina needs to reach for a D or the Russian. They take the BPA over need and compile assets that can use you to improve the team through trades.
You can switch a center to wing as well. Did Tanguay being a center stop Colorado from taking him and adding him into a stacked team?
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 09:51 AM
|
#22
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Mackinnon
Jones
Drouin
Barkov
Lindholm
Monahan
Nurse
Nichuskin
Shinkaruk
Domi
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 09:52 AM
|
#23
|
|
Franchise Player
|
why in the world did Colorado match the Flames offer for O`Rielly?
Where would O'Rielly go in this draft..?.... Just based on talent and potential and then when you factor in he takes up 10% for your cap space.
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 09:52 AM
|
#24
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
It can't be understated how top heavy this draft is. The top 8 (give or take) would have all been first overall picks in the last couple of years. Really hope the Flames walk away with Lindholm or Monahan.
Hopefully the Russian gets snagged by someone before us to let someone else "fall". Maybe Nashville?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 09:54 AM
|
#25
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
why in the world did Colorado match the Flames offer for O`Rielly?
|
Because it was a risk, for both sides. The Flames flirted with a top four pick, if that happened advantage for the Av's. The Flames also flirted with moving towards it being a pick in the 9-10 range... where they probably wouldn't get a player as good as O'Reily.
Not what this thread is about anyways though.
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 09:57 AM
|
#26
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
The Oilers will not be taking a D-man IMO.
They will make a trade for an NHL D-man and pick Monahan
|
Hope not, that would mean the flames passed on him. Monahan is the kind of center that wins playoff rounds. Flames need him.
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:00 AM
|
#27
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
The Oilers will not be taking a D-man IMO.
They will make a trade for an NHL D-man and pick Monahan
|
I'd love to see the math in this happening
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:08 AM
|
#28
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
Hope not, that would mean the flames passed on him. Monahan is the kind of center that wins playoff rounds. Flames need him.
|
My guess is that the Flames' order of preference is:
Barkov, Lindholm, Monahan
Unlikely (but certainly possible) that both Barkov an Lindholm are gone when we pick. If so, however, I think the Flames take Monahan
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:12 AM
|
#29
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho
I'd love to see the math in this happening
|
I happen to agree. They would package Gagner to get a top 4 defenseman if they could draft one of Barkov, Monahan, Lindholm (that order). They only take a defenseman if they win the lotto (or trade their 1st in a package for a top 2 defenseman).
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:15 AM
|
#30
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
why in the world did Colorado match the Flames offer for O`Rielly?
Where would O'Rielly go in this draft..?.... Just based on talent and potential and then when you factor in he takes up 10% for your cap space.
|
To Flames:
Stastny (and his massive caphit)
Avs 1st rounder
To Avs:
Flames #1 pick
Blues #1 pick
flames use the pick to get Mackinnon 
Takers?
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:16 AM
|
#31
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
It can't be understated how top heavy this draft is. The top 8 (give or take) would have all been first overall picks in the last couple of years. Really hope the Flames walk away with Lindholm or Monahan.
Hopefully the Russian gets snagged by someone before us to let someone else "fall". Maybe Nashville?
|
Haha...maybe the top 3 but definitely not the top 8. Nuge, Huberdeau, Landeskog, Yakupov and Murray were all way bigger prospects than guys like Lindholm, Monahan or Nurse.
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:18 AM
|
#32
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Hopefully the Russian gets snagged by someone before us to let someone else "fall". Maybe Nashville?
|
They're likely still hungover from Radulov and Kostitsyn. I can't see that happening with the other quality players available at 5/6.
Carolina? Paired with Semin and the Staal brothers; Could jump in right away; don't need another center. They need defense but they also signed Semin to a 6 year deal so who knows what they're thinking.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Clever_Iggy For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:19 AM
|
#33
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy
To Flames:
Stastny (and his massive caphit)
Avs 1st rounder
To Avs:
Flames #1 pick
Blues #1 pick
flames use the pick to get Mackinnon
Takers? |
With the UFa market being as bad as it is, Stastny will have some value even with his large cap hit.
I could see the flames offering the Pitt pick for him straight across.
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:20 AM
|
#34
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burnitdown
Haha...maybe the top 3 but definitely not the top 8. Nuge, Huberdeau, Landeskog, Yakupov and Murray were all way bigger prospects than guys like Lindholm, Monahan or Nurse.
|
Landeskog and Huberdeau, ya. Never impressed with Murray.
And your colors are showing by including "Nuge" and the one dimensional Yakupov.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Clever_Iggy For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:23 AM
|
#36
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burnitdown
Haha...maybe the top 3 but definitely not the top 8. Nuge, Huberdeau, Landeskog, Yakupov and Murray were all way bigger prospects than guys like Lindholm, Monahan or Nurse.
|
Disagree. I think the latter names are just as good as the former.
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:27 AM
|
#37
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
I just can't see anything that would be enough value for one of the top 3 picks.
Remember, for the most part, not making risky moves avoids the "move that got me fired". Add that to the fact the GMs in the bottom 3 are likely in a bit of trouble already and I don't see them passing up a sure fire star for cap relief and riskier picks, or multiple riskier picks
|
|
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:29 AM
|
#38
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy
To Flames:
Stastny (and his massive caphit)
Avs 1st rounder
To Avs:
Flames #1 pick
Blues #1 pick
flames use the pick to get Mackinnon
Takers? |
I doubt the Avs take those 2 picks for their pick, never mind throwing in Stastny as well.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:29 AM
|
#39
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
It can't be understated how top heavy this draft is. The top 8 (give or take) would have all been first overall picks in the last couple of years. Really hope the Flames walk away with Lindholm or Monahan.
Hopefully the Russian gets snagged by someone before us to let someone else "fall". Maybe Nashville?
|
No way. Top three would have been, but that's it from everything I've read.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-28-2013, 10:29 AM
|
#40
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube
Yep, best part about both my fave teams having crappy seasons is they both pick in the top 10, and between the two have five first round picks overall. I'm booking the day off |
I have a feeling both of our team will be in the bottom 5 picks next year so we'll have a lot more excitement coming both of our ways!
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 AM.
|
|
