04-13-2013, 11:36 AM
|
#1381
|
Franchise Player
|
I hear so much about Nurse, but every time I try to see clips of his play it's fights. Craig Button seems to be relatively high on him.
Quote:
Button said his choice as the second-best defenceman on the draft board after Jones would be Darnell Nurse of the Sault Ste. Marie Greyhounds of the Ontario Hockey League. Nurse, who has 11 goals, 36 points and 104 penalty minutes this season, is ranked No. 9 on Central Scouting's midterm list.
"He has expanded his game to the point that allows him to impact many areas of the ice," Button said. "I've seen a real progression in his offensive play and a development in terms of his command of the game."
|
A lot of his opinion in this article.
http://flames.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=663813
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 11:38 AM
|
#1382
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
A pick later than that would be disappointing - though the one kid I know nothing about is Nurse.
|
many scouts are raving about the kid, he has great size and seems to project to be a very solid and steady defenseman. Has risen a lot in all the rankings over the past months, I think he was somewhere between 15 and 20 everywhere a few months ago, but all he did was rise and rise. FWIW Button now has him at 6, ahead of Monahan and Lindholm.
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 12:17 PM
|
#1383
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Nurse is big, very mobile, has some skills and seems to have a nice mean streak. He's going to be physically dominant in the NHL when he fills out his frame IMO. I'm basing this on watching him in the top prospects game. Very good prospect that I'd be ecstatic to land in other years. Still hoping for a #1 centre or Jones this year. Can't wait til we know our draft position.
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 12:23 PM
|
#1384
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary
|
How does Nurse compare to Phaneuf at the same age? The description sounds very similar.
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 12:37 PM
|
#1385
|
Franchise Player
|
I seriously CANNOT wait for this draft.
Just reading prospects forum ,really excited to see Cundari and Kulak. I trust this scouting team right now.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Da_Chief For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2013, 01:14 PM
|
#1387
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
^ Petan's size seems to be holding him back in the rankings
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 01:16 PM
|
#1388
|
Franchise Player
|
You can't be ~5'8" and be a successful centre in the NHL. He'll be a late round pick.
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 01:17 PM
|
#1389
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada 02
What prospect with some flaw that it is currently holding his ranking down, but may be a sleeper pick because the flaw isn't insurmountable? Who is this years Getzlaf, Perry or Weber?
I mentioned Burakowski earlier, who sounds like he has speed and skill, but isn't getting much playing time in Malmo
Perhaps Mantha who is knocked for inconsistency or lackadaisical play, not unlike Getzlaf in 2003
|
Nichushkin because of his KHL contract. I'd take this guy over everyone but the top 4
Last edited by ignite09; 04-13-2013 at 01:37 PM.
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 01:32 PM
|
#1390
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
^ Petan's size seems to be holding him back in the rankings
|
Petan certainly has big numbers, and is the same size as Patrick Kane when he was drafted in 07
aside: funny that the Blackhawks list Kane as 5'11", 180lbs. Anyone believe those numbers?
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 01:34 PM
|
#1391
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
You can't be ~5'8" and be a successful centre in the NHL. He'll be a late round pick.
|
Giroux and Skinner were around 5'9'' in their draft years IIRC.
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 01:37 PM
|
#1392
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Giroux and Skinner were around 5'9'' in their draft years IIRC.
|
Skinner has played mostly on the wing since he started playing in the NHL.
And if that was Giroux's size when he was drafted, he's 5'11" now. Odds are your prospects don't grow that much after they are drafted.
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 02:08 PM
|
#1394
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
Assuming Pittsburgh finishes 2nd in the league.
The vary best that is possible is 15th and 21st. If St Louis, Pittsburgh, Chicago, and 5 teams that were better then Stl loss in the first round.
|
If PIT finishes 2nd in the league, the best that pick could be is 25th. The draft order is organized as:
1-14: Non playoff teams
15-26: Playoff teams eliminated in the first 2 rounds
27-28: Conference Finalists
29: Stanley Cup Finalist
30: Stanley Cup Champion
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 02:18 PM
|
#1395
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
left winger Taylor Cammarata could be a sleeper as a Gaudreau type. Only 5'7", but had insane USHL stats. Maybe a long-shot, but in a few years, he could reward a team willing to risk a 2nd or 3rd rounder on him.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2013, 02:23 PM
|
#1396
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
|
Want Mackinnon or Drouin then I want some bigger guys like Zykov and Zadorov
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 02:41 PM
|
#1397
|
Not Jim Playfair
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
^ Petan's size seems to be holding him back in the rankings
|
He could be a really good player and would be a great pick with the Pittsburgh pick, especially great if the Flames still had their 2nd round pick.
__________________
CORNELL
National Champions: 1967, 1970
CALGARY
Stanley Cup Champions: 1989
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 02:52 PM
|
#1398
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
hypothetical question for you guys: let's say we draft 3rd overall. COL and FLA draft #1 and #2 and select Jones and MacKinnon, respectively. Do you take Drouin at 3 or go for Barkov? Drouin obviously fits the BPA philosophy, but arguably our two best prospects, Sven and Johnny, are LW already and Barkov would fit better position-wise. What do you do? Go!
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 02:54 PM
|
#1399
|
Not Jim Playfair
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
hypothetical question for you guys: let's say we draft 3rd overall. COL and FLA draft #1 and #2 and select Jones and MacKinnon, respectively. Do you take Drouin at 3 or go for Barkov? Drouin obviously fits the BPA philosophy, but arguably our two best prospects, Sven and Johnny, are LW already and Barkov would fit better position-wise. What do you do? Go!
|
I absolutely go with Drouin who is arguably having the best season of any player in the draft.
__________________
CORNELL
National Champions: 1967, 1970
CALGARY
Stanley Cup Champions: 1989
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to calgARI For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2013, 03:01 PM
|
#1400
|
Franchise Player
|
Yep. You go with the clear BPA in Drouin.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:11 AM.
|
|