03-28-2013, 01:34 PM
|
#141
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeanLucPicard
If he gets traded and holds a press conference, it will be 2 hrs long.
|
Ummm...
...
Yep.
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:37 PM
|
#142
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaine
Ummm...
...
Yep.
|
Ok well either 2 hrs long or 2 seconds long
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:38 PM
|
#143
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
This is how you rebuild, turn a 3rd round pick and Jordon Leopold into Bouwmeester back into a first round pick and TBD.
|
But in the meantime miss out on 4 straight years of playoffs?
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:38 PM
|
#144
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaine
Really not a lot of point holding onto your biggest asset that may or may not want to sign here after next season when your team will be fighting for the 1'st overall pick for the next couple seasons.
Also I wouldn't hold your breath on Glencross, he is about as untouchable as it gets considering he signed to stay in Alberta for a pretty substantial discount compared to what he could have got on the open market, and he has a NTC. Glencross won't be going anywhere.
|
It really depends on the conversation you have with him. If he is not interested in resigning next year, trading him this year makes a lot more sense than at the deadline.
At a minimum if he is not interested in resigning shortly after July 1st then you move him in the summer rather than waiting for the deadline. But... if he is willing to stay you keep him. I think he takes a lot of pressure off of our other defensemen.
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:38 PM
|
#145
|
Franchise Player
|
I only hope that Feaster can pull off trading an asset away for a few generic pieces that will never see the NHL...
Oh wait!
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:41 PM
|
#146
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
@vickihallch
Jay Bouwmeester looks pained in discussing yet another season with no playoffs. Admits he has talked to team about his future. #onthemove
|
This is encouraging. I didn't think Bouwmeester cared about winning, but it would be embarrassing to go another 2 years without playoffs for him.
Having a playoff reseme should help him land a better deal when he becomes a UFA in 2 years.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:41 PM
|
#147
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
It really depends on the conversation you have with him. If he is not interested in resigning next year, trading him this year makes a lot more sense than at the deadline.
At a minimum if he is not interested in resigning shortly after July 1st then you move him in the summer rather than waiting for the deadline. But... if he is willing to stay you keep him. I think he takes a lot of pressure off of our other defensemen.
|
I can agree with some of that, except I don't really think anyone on this team (outside of Gio maybe since he likely is being moved towards the leadership roll) feels any pressure anymore. The players see the same things we do, and while nobody should or would ever tank on purpose they know they are headed for a top 3 draft finish. Can't believe the players, defencemen would have much pressure to do anything but go out there and play.
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:43 PM
|
#148
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
|
Lebrun has mentioned that St. Louis has been 'basically begging' for Bouwmeester; McKenzie last night (in the heat of the Iginla uncertainty) threw out a little nugget along the lines of: 'wouldn't it be surprising amidst all this Iginla talk if the Flames would up trading Bouwmeester.' It would seem discussions around #4 are pretty far along?
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:44 PM
|
#149
|
Franchise Player
|
i really hope we hear of more flames moves soon. I need to move on from this Iginla thing quickly.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bubbsy For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:48 PM
|
#150
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
|
I think a lot of players will be wanting out. Like someone else said. I think Jerome was the glue keeping a lot of people/friends here.
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:49 PM
|
#151
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psytic
I think a lot of players will be wanting out. Like someone else said. I think Jerome was the glue keeping a lot of people/friends here.
|
Dude, come on.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to YYC in LAX For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:51 PM
|
#152
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yyc in lax
dude, come on.
|
Go Jarmoe!
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:51 PM
|
#153
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
Just that move though is the good one. All others have been in the wrong direction, which is why we are what we are today.
|
Oh i think we were all ecstatic the day Sutter broke the CP server once again and signed Bouw. We had a top 3 defence on that day. too bad we had a bottom 3 coach.
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:52 PM
|
#154
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatter
I hope Bouw isn't traded. He's not that old, and at best we'd be hoping to draft Jay Bouwmeester with the pick we get for him.
Unless we get Couturier or another potential top line centre in return I'd rather he stays.
|
^
With the new coaching system really working for Bouwmeester, I would much rather see him stay and be a core member of the rebuild. However, if he doesn't see the light at the end of the tunnel and wants out, then we better be seeing a #1C (or potential one) coming back in the return.
I would definitely rather keep Bouwmeester over Giordano as far as having key components to rebuild around.
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:53 PM
|
#155
|
Not Jim Playfair
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psytic
I think a lot of players will be wanting out. Like someone else said. I think Jerome was the glue keeping a lot of people/friends here.
|
Yeah for sure. Gotta think Tanguay, Cammalleri, Bouwmeester, Kiprusoff definitely gone in the next week or in the next year.
I see Glencross, Hudler, Backlund, Baertschi, Brodie, Giordano, Wideman as the pieces they will try and build around.
__________________
CORNELL
National Champions: 1967, 1970
CALGARY
Stanley Cup Champions: 1989
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to calgARI For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:55 PM
|
#156
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven
^
With the new coaching system really working for Bouwmeester, I would much rather see him stay and be a core member of the rebuild. However, if he doesn't see the light at the end of the tunnel and wants out, then we better be seeing a #1C (or potential one) coming back in the return.
I would definitely rather keep Bouwmeester over Giordano as far as having key components to rebuild around.
|
I don't think either Bouwmeester OR Giordano need to be considered by the time this team has the capability to be an actual contender... (4-5yrs?)
I would agree though, if you can do it quicker than that (?), having this version of Bouwmeester be here would be great... but I think the pieces you could get in return for Bouwmeester, would help the Flames franchise more over a longer period of time than the years where he could still be here himself.
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:56 PM
|
#157
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bertuzzied
Oh i think we were all ecstatic the day Sutter broke the CP server once again and signed Bouw. We had a top 3 defence on that day. too bad we had a bottom 3 coach.
|
It's hilarious that people can praise Hartley for turning around J-Bouw and Stajan and then bash Brent Sutter in the same thread.
Do you not realize where we are in the standings and where we were under Brent? Hartley is somehow a better coach who gets worse results behind the same team.
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:56 PM
|
#158
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
|
I bet St. Louis wants to make room for Tarasenko in the top 6 and Stewart (despite his productive season) looks to me like that odd man out. He's also a RFA next season, so that has to be considered. I'm not sure if he's what the Flames need...
I came up with something like this...
Bouwmeester + Jackman + 4th Round Pick
for
Schwartz + Russell + 1st Round Pick?
|
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:58 PM
|
#159
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
|
does it matter Feaster will allow Bouwmeester's agent to submit a list of 4 that become a list of 1.
Is his agent Meehan's also ? I don't know.
I'm so very jaded about this whole management group.
Bouwmeester has been traded to the Detroit Redwings for who, who.
Lets just see it should be a 1st round pick. Can Feaster negotiate a no brainer 1st round pick and Weisbrod will scour the Redwings orginization for an NCAA prospect that is almost a certainty.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Stay Golden For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2013, 01:59 PM
|
#160
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Why would Bouwmeester waive his NTC to go to a non playoff team?
|
Because he doesn't know any different?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:19 AM.
|
|