Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-20-2012, 04:34 PM   #161
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_ View Post
^^ wow! people like this exist?
What you not been reading Polak's posts?
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 12-20-2012, 04:35 PM   #162
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother View Post
What you not been reading Polak's posts?
You remind me of one of those hype guys that rappers have who just say random crap in the background while the real act does his thing.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 04:52 PM   #163
jammies
Basement Chicken Choker
 
jammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
Exp:
Default

What societal good will we achieve by changing the law as it is now? It may be a somewhat arbitrary choice of age, but there needs to be SOME kind of age of consent, and better to err a bit too high than too low. Further, there has to be some protection against sexual coercion, and again it's better to be too stringent than not stringent enough, because people are very very good at getting around limits.

Let's face it - teenage boys are stupid and don't know what they want. The argument that they want to have sex with their teachers means very little - they also want to drink to excess, drive too fast, sample illegal drugs, and bang every half-decent looking girl they see. Generally we want to discourage such behaviour, knowing that they will get around our rules to some extent, but not to the extent that they wish they could. Otherwise - CHAOS!
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
jammies is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jammies For This Useful Post:
Old 12-20-2012, 05:02 PM   #164
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
You remind me of one of those hype guys that rappers have who just say random crap in the background while the real act does his thing.

You have done nothing but offer your opinion, your belief on this topic.

When asked for a source on your statement that males are not affected by this type of thing you have nothing.

When presented with information by an individual that is more educated than you, you dismiss their points citing your "opinion".


My expression of what you remind me of will get me a binning.

Sadly, I only hope that one day you experience this type of situation.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 12-20-2012, 05:16 PM   #165
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Im sorry, I didn't know that this was a formal academic research setting where opinion isn't welcome. I also must have missed all the peer reviewed sources others have posted in this thread.

I offered my opinion on the article in the OP. It was an opinion that sparked a discussion and I participated in that discussion. I fail to see where I offended you oh so dearly but at this point, I really couldn't care less.

Last edited by polak; 12-20-2012 at 05:19 PM.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 05:31 PM   #166
EddyBeers
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Im sorry, I didn't know that this was a formal academic research setting where opinion isn't welcome. I also must have missed all the peer reviewed sources others have posted in this thread.

I offered my opinion on the article in the OP. It was an opinion that sparked a discussion and I participated in that discussion. I fail to see where I offended you oh so dearly but at this point, I really couldn't care less.
The issue that I have is that your opinion is right up there with "She was asking for it, she was wearing a short skirt" in my opinion. Not sure if was you, but when you mix in the men like sex, women do not aspect with a complete lack of understanding of the long term consequences of such sexual abuse and it just seems incredibly uninformed.

There are studies all over the place if you are interested in learning more about the subject
http://www.jimhopper.com/pdfs/Dube_%..._of_victim.pdf

Last edited by EddyBeers; 12-20-2012 at 05:36 PM.
EddyBeers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to EddyBeers For This Useful Post:
Old 12-20-2012, 05:41 PM   #167
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

How you get from my simple disagreement with the idea that all consensual sex between teachers and 16+ students is equal to sexual abuse, too something as ridiculous as the "short skirt" argument is unfathomable to me, but okay.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 01:43 AM   #168
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyBeers View Post
The issue that I have is that your opinion is right up there with "She was asking for it, she was wearing a short skirt" in my opinion...
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
How you get from my simple disagreement with the idea that all consensual sex between teachers and 16+ students is equal to sexual abuse, too something as ridiculous as the "short skirt" argument is unfathomable to me, but okay.
I think that maybe the equation comes from some of the utterly idiotic things you have spewed in this thread, such as:

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
...most of the time, a female teacher and male student getting it on is an awesome victimless fun party. Guys are wired differently when it comes to sex...
More to the point, EddyBeers was not making a direct accusation, but rather was drawing an analogy between your poorly formed opinion and other such ideas that are equally as medieval. That is, the idea that all teenage boys are more likely to enjoy "consensual" sexual relationships with their teachers. I have set consensual in scare-quotes because there is a critical point in this argument that you continue to miss. See if you can figure it out.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2012, 01:50 AM   #169
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Im sorry, I didn't know that this was a formal academic research setting where opinion isn't welcome. I also must have missed all the peer reviewed sources others have posted in this thread.
In the first place, just because you have an opinion, that does not mean that it will be a good one. Nor does it follow that your opinion on any given topic contains the same weight or value as others simply because you have one. You have been asked to defend your opinion because other have recognised that it appears poorly formed, contrary to more conventional thinking, and in conflict with available scientific evidence. Simply put: if you are going to go against the grain, then don't be surprised when others require you to offer an explanation.

Furthermore, you seem to have ignored the fact that EddyBeers has in fact produced a good deal of scientific evidence to counter your opinion. And then instead of rethinking some of your own fairly ignorant posts on the subject, or taking the time to consider why others might take offense, you behave like a petulant child; whining about the injustice of having to defend your ideas in a public form with some form of evidence beyond your gut instinct.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project

Last edited by Textcritic; 12-21-2012 at 02:19 AM.
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2012, 06:54 AM   #170
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Ri...234/story.html

Quote:
The good news is there are things that can be done to prevent it, according to Robert Shoop, a Kansas State University professor who has written about teacher sexual misconduct.
There are typically two types of offenders, he said. One is the pedophile who is in the teaching profession to prey on children.
There other type is a teacher who is immature and doesn’t know proper boundaries, Shoop said. They didn’t set out to do something bad, but cross a line from “being a mentor to being a molester.” Some don’t even believe they are doing anything wrong.
Parents should teach their kids to tell them about their teacher’s conduct, he said, such as a teacher e-mailing the student at home, or singling out a child with gifts. A ride home may be perfectly innocent, but a parent should know about it.
In most cases, the teacher grooms the student before abuse begins, Shoop said. One of the difficulties is the student can end up believing they are a willing participant and don’t turn the teacher in because they think they are in love.

__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 08:35 AM   #171
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

One, I defended my opinion throughout all 8 pages of this bloody thread.

Two, I wasn't alone in my opinion.

Three, there was no scientific sources. There was a psychiatrist who pointed out a possible result of such relationships, which I agreed could happen, however, I pointed out the lack of statistics that shows how often those types of relationships lead to such serious consequences.

Four, that comment that Tex picked out was obviously meant to be light hearted like many others I made before this discussion got serious.

Five, I conceded the idea that both male and females students should be evaluated on a case by case basis immediately when the idea was first brought up because I agree it is hard to say how it will effect individuals of both genders.

Six, I get that because it's a student-teacher relationship, it legally can't be consensual until the student is 18. I'm pretty sure I'm the one who pointed that out. My whole stance in this argument is that I don't agree with the notion that a 16 year old who can legally drive or decide to drop out of school, or better yet a 17 year old who can join the Canadian forces, isn't capable of agreeing to a (otherwise consensual) relationship despite the fact that it's with a teacher.

Seven, I never once said that I don't agree that such relationships are inappropriate. I repeated, multiple times, that teachers should automatically lose their jobs and an investigation into the relationship should take place. I mean, if a 17 year old was in a relationship with their 20 year old boss at their job, would it lead to legal consequences? I seriously doubt it.

Last edited by polak; 12-21-2012 at 08:40 AM.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 08:39 AM   #172
Bertuzzied
Lifetime Suspension
 
Bertuzzied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coys1882 View Post
The most amusing part of this thread is that it's titled Teacher charged with Sex Assault but some people got turned off of it because 'it got dark' - what kind of thread about sexual assault starts off light and hearty? LOLZ
well when actual members here started to tell us how they were raped and molested its not exactly LOL posts
Bertuzzied is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bertuzzied For This Useful Post:
Old 12-26-2012, 01:50 PM   #173
RichKlit
Crash and Bang Winger
 
RichKlit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

There are a couple people in this thread who are the epitome of why male and for that matter female abuse victims of all kinds are afraid to come forward. It only takes one ignorant comment from someone like many of the ones posted in here to stop someone from coming forward.

The ignorance displayed by some of the posters in here is stunning, for every hallway hero there is, there is also a scared mouse of a kid who wouldnt know what to do or how to deal with it afterwards.

On a personal note i find downright terrifying how cavalier some of the attitudes toward underage sex appears to be. I clicked on this thread and thought it would be overwhelmingly against this type of abuse, pretty surprised/disappointed to see some of the posts. Maybe im just old and way out of touch but abuse is abuse regardless of gender, period.

Last edited by RichKlit; 12-26-2012 at 01:58 PM.
RichKlit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RichKlit For This Useful Post:
Old 12-27-2012, 01:40 AM   #174
Skootenbeeten
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
How you get from my simple disagreement with the idea that all consensual sex between teachers and 16+ students is equal to sexual abuse, too something as ridiculous as the "short skirt" argument is unfathomable to me, but okay.
What about gay men and their male students or lesbians? I mean you said the double standard is fine so I guess open season right?
Skootenbeeten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 04:00 PM   #175
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichKlit View Post
On a personal note i find downright terrifying how cavalier some of the attitudes toward underage sex appears to be. I clicked on this thread and thought it would be overwhelmingly against this type of abuse, pretty surprised/disappointed to see some of the posts. Maybe im just old and way out of touch but abuse is abuse regardless of gender, period.
I agree. That said, some of the comments in this thread have reminded me of some fantastic moments from Seinfeld and It's Always Sunny, so it wasn't a total loss.

"It moved!"

"I've never statuatorily raped someone before..."
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 02:55 PM   #176
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Thought I might bump this as thread, maybe I should do a Silver Sex Assualt thread.

http://www.calgarysun.com/2013/03/11...ng-sex-charges

Quote:
A 27-year-old teacher — at a Catholic school with a specialized program for teen girls — has been charged after reports that he was in a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl.
Taking advantage of innocence is disgusting.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 03:23 PM   #177
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Doesn't specify whether teacher was female.

Not sure if "Niiiiicccceeeeee!"
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 03:28 PM   #178
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan View Post
Doesn't specify whether teacher was female.

Not sure if "Niiiiicccceeeeee!"
He wasn't female.

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/...612/story.html

Quote:
The Edmonton police child protection section arrested and charged the teacher from St. Basil Catholic School, at 10210 115th Ave., for “a number of sexual offences that allegedly occurred between him and a female student,” Insp. Dave Spiers said during a brief statement at police headquarters.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 03:30 PM   #179
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

I'd say its a dude

Quote:
has been charged after reports that he was in a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl.
So gross on either side of the coin that some 27 year old needs to have sex with a 15 year old.

One step above the creepy restaurant manager asking young chicks where the cool parties are at.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 03:38 PM   #180
J epworth
Franchise Player
 
J epworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I'd say its a dude



So gross on either side of the coin that some 27 year old needs to have sex with a 15 year old.

One step above the creepy restaurant manager asking young chicks where the cool parties are at.
Plus it also states his name in the article, so it's 100% a guy.

Both this situation and the one posted back in December are disgusting, and it doesn't matter in my mind if it was a male teacher or female teacher, it's still sexual assault. The one thing that irks me though is that they do state the accused name in this article but kept the accused anonymous in the December article.
J epworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy