Kate Middleton - Nude Pics Circulating!

[TurnedTheCorner]

Originally Posted by fotze

Maybe this will help the world see that nudity is not a big deal......and more bobs for all.

[Canuck-Hater]

Pics or GTFO

[metallicat]

I still can't find the pictures.

[TurnedTheCorner]

http://www.theonion.com/articles/kat...blished,29563/

Middle guy nailed it.

[MoneyGuy]

Originally Posted by SeeBass

This photo was taken from a 1/2 a mile. How much expectation of privacy does a person need.

I havent looked at the photos and I wont, this is a woman that has done nothing but act respectful as her roll as the future queen and she gets marginalized by a cheap piece of crap photographer

Absolute garbage she doesn't deserve this

Ha, misspelling one word gives this a whole different possible meaning.

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally Posted by MoneyGuy

Ha, misspelling one word gives this a whole different possible meaning.

"Different possible" sounds like a great Christopher Nolan thriller.

[Cowperson]

Regardless of the right or wrong, the world's number one payday target for photographers should be more paranoid about parading out of doors in the buff, private estate or not.

The victim shouldn't be blamed, but in the real, sleazy world................... she should have seen that one coming. Ditto Harry a few weeks ago.

It will be interesting to see how the legal stuff works out.

Cowperson

[Berger]

Awesome, now when do we get to see Pipa!?

[Cowperson]

Regardless of the right or wrong, the world's number one payday target for photographers should be more paranoid about parading out of doors in the buff, private estate or not.

The victim shouldn't be blamed, but in the real, sleazy world................... she should have seen that one coming. Ditto Harry a few weeks ago.

It will be interesting to see how the legal stuff works out.

Cowperson

[Flame Of Liberty]

According to common law:

If you are on taxpayer's dime, your cans are a public property.

I'm torn if i should google it at work

[sun]

Would.

[Mike F]

Originally Posted by SeeBass

This is a photo of a woman who has nothing and I repeat nothing to deserve having these photos taken.

Your dislike of the royals has blinded you not see the difference between this case and crap celebs who does this on purpose.

Originally Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard

I am quite indifferent about the royal family seeing as though they have absolutely no impact to me in my life. That being said from a human standpoint, if someone doesn't want themselves to be photographed naked/topless and is in a private residence where one can be expected to have that expectation of privacy and someone photographs them, I can understand them being upset. This is no different than a peeping tom putting a camera in a ladies washroom or attempting to photograph under a ladies skirt.

Just because she is in the royal family doesn't mean that she should have no expectation of privacy at any point during her life.

IMO, this is a woman who voluntarily entered into a life of fame, privilege, and riches with full knowledge that, in doing so, she'd become one of the biggest focuses of public interest in the world.

This isn't Kate Middleton being victimized, it's her getting a taste of the cost of becoming a princess.

Don't want to be photographed topless? Don't go topless.

[schteve_d]

She wasn't getting pig-roasted. She was topless and in her mind in a private setting. I really fail to see the big deal at all. Whoever published the phots is a complete arse-hole but really, why does the rest of the world care? They're boobs. We've all seen 'em. It's ridiculous what a big story this has become.

[The Goon]

What's more disturbing than anything is the improper apostrophe in the thread title.

[SeeBass]

Originally Posted by Mike F

IMO, this is a woman who voluntarily entered into a life of fame, privilege, and riches with full knowledge that, in doing so, she'd become one of the biggest focuses of public interest in the world.

This isn't Kate Middleton being victimized, it's her getting a taste of the cost of becoming a princess.

Don't want to be photographed topless? Don't go topless.

So the rule is that all famous women have no right to privacy cause they choose to be famous.

This is a person who has done nothing but cut ribbons at hospitals and visit kids that are dying.

Do you have any idea what this will do to her? She has been marginalized to a pair of t--ts in a paper? No matter what she does these pics will come up. So the price of being a princess is a loss of dignity...nice.

Are there other situations I don't know about when it is ok to degrade a women? A short skirt means ok to hit on?, a hooker can be raped?
There must be a line that you have that says it's ok, just where does it start? Does it start at fame then?

Its not the fact that somebody took those pictures that is disgusting its that somebody paid for them.

[GirlySports]

Originally Posted by SeeBass

So the rule is that all famous women have no right to privacy cause they choose to be famous.

This is a person who has done nothing but cut ribbons at hospitals and visit kids that are dying.

Do you have any idea what this will do to her? She has been marginalized to a pair of t--ts in a paper? No matter what she does these pics will come up. So the price of being a princess is a loss of dignity...nice.

Are there other situations I don't know about when it is ok to degrade a women? A short skirt means ok to hit on?, a hooker can be raped?
There must be a line that you have that says it's ok, just where does it start? Does it start at fame then?

Its not the fact that somebody took those pictures that is disgusting its that somebody paid for them.

and disgusting that people are buying the paper.

[Handsome B. Wonderful]

Originally Posted by SeeBass

So the rule is that all famous women have no right to privacy cause they choose to be famous.

This is a person who has done nothing but cut ribbons at hospitals and visit kids that are dying.

Do you have any idea what this will do to her? She has been marginalized to a pair of t--ts in a paper? No matter what she does these pics will come up. So the price of being a princess is a loss of dignity...nice.

Are there other situations I don't know about when it is ok to degrade a women? A short skirt means ok to hit on?, a hooker can be raped?
There must be a line that you have that says it's ok, just where does it start? Does it start at fame then?

Its not the fact that somebody took those pictures that is disgusting its that somebody paid for them.

Where's your post complaining about Prince Harry's nude pics? Double standard much?

[Flames Fan, Ph.D.]

Meh. I'm not much of a breasts guy.

[bigtmac19]

Originally Posted by Handsome B. Wonderful

Where's your post complaining about Prince Harry's nude pics? Double standard much?

No Prince Harry was entirely his own fault. Again a private estate, she had every expectation of privacy.

[Mike F]

Originally Posted by SeeBass

So the rule is that all famous women have no right to privacy cause they choose to be famous.

This is a person who has done nothing but cut ribbons at hospitals and visit kids that are dying.

Do you have any idea what this will do to her? She has been marginalized to a pair of t--ts in a paper? No matter what she does these pics will come up. So the price of being a princess is a loss of dignity...nice.

The cost of becoming wife of the future King of England is a loss of personal privacy. This has been a well known fact since well before Ms. Middleton was born, so if she wasn't prepared to accept that her private life was going to become public interest, she should have married a school teacher.

Originally Posted by SeeBass

Are there other situations I don't know about when it is ok to degrade a women? A short skirt means ok to hit on?, a hooker can be raped?
There must be a line that you have that says it's ok, just where does it start? Does it start at fame then?

Its not the fact that somebody took those pictures that is disgusting its that somebody paid for them.

Oh, give me a F***ing break. Being photographed when you chose to go topless is equivalent to rape?

As for the short skirt analogy, I'd say that any attractive woman who chooses to wear a short skirt to a night club can expect to be hit on. Therefore, if you are a woman who doesn't feel like being hit on, don't go to a night club, or dress more modestly.

Edit: The line is, if the known and expected outcome of engaging in a given act is X, don't engage in that act and then become offended when X occurs.