Kate Middleton - Nude Pics Circulating!

[SeeBass]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

no, no I am not.

yeah you are

you are using the "she deserves it cause..." defence

[JohnnyHowDoO'duya]

well i cant find no nudies anyhow but SeeBass makes a compelling point

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by Zevo

Wonder if you'd feel the same if some entrepeunurial young man posted pics of your wife taken through a bedroom window

Oh yes, I am sure we draw the same attention.

[bigtmac19]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

It's those very "skivvy perv"'s that keep them in the style they have become accustomed. They feed the machine, them complaining about this is like Paris Hilton complaining about her "axewound" being on the internet.

Apples and oranges. Paparazzi have nothing to do with their position or their lifestyle. She was at a private home on vacation and should have every expectation of privacy. That guy is a scumbag.

[To Be Quite Honest]

Went in thinking Kate Upton left unsatisfied and flaccid...

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

It's those very "skivvy perv"'s that keep them in the style they have become accustomed. They feed the machine, them complaining about this is like Paris Hilton complaining about her "axewound" being on the internet.

Again, you're painfully confused.

Paris Hilton is famous because she got naked, Kate Middleton married into royalty, royalty that has been around a lot longer then pseudo-celebrities.

Kate didn't do anything wrong, she doesn't deserve it.

[Zevo]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

Oh yes, I am sure we draw the same attention.

Does it matter...how would you feel? How about your daughter?

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally Posted by To Be Quite Honest

Went in thinking Kate Upton left unsatisfied and flaccid...

If you can't get hard at the thought of Kate Middleton, a truly classic beauty, you might want to get that blood flow checked.

[To Be Quite Honest]

Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm

Again, you're painfully confused.

Paris Hilton is famous because she got naked, Kate Middleton married into royalty, royalty that has been around a lot longer then pseudo-celebrities.

Kate didn't do anything wrong, she doesn't deserve it.

Strike it down as lesson learned. I am sure millions are being spent trying to take the pictures down. Nobody deserves it, but that doesn't mean you can't be more responsible with your image.

[To Be Quite Honest]

Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm

If you can't get hard at the thought of Kate Middleton, a truly classic beauty, you might want to get that blood flow checked.

Ha ha ha. Dude, seriously, you must have a serious giggle crush on her.

[SeeBass]

[QUOTE=To Be Quite Honest;3865822]Strike it down as lesson learned. I am sure millions are being spent trying to take the pictures down. Nobody deserves it, but that doesn't mean you can't be more responsible with your image.[/QUOTE]

See what you are saying is absolute garbage.

These photos where taken about a 1/2 mile away with a major lens.

How dare you or anybody blame her for laying in a private yard far from the naked eyes of anyone

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm

Again, you're painfully confused.

Paris Hilton is famous because she got naked, Kate Middleton married into royalty, royalty that has been around a lot longer then pseudo-celebrities.

Kate didn't do anything wrong, she doesn't deserve it.

In my eyes there is not difference between old and new money.

I don't support the "privilage of royalty"

Also, I am wondering why none of you have started threads about all the other public figures that have been photographed in the same situation....

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

I
Also, I am wondering why none of you have started threads about all the other public figures that have been photographed in the same situation....

I don't understand, what's your point here?

Only one person started this thread.

[SeeBass]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

In my eyes there is not difference between old and new money.

I don't support the "privilage of royalty"

Also, I am wondering why none of you have started threads about all the other public figures that have been photographed in the same situation....

This is a photo of a woman who has nothing and I repeat nothing to deserve having these photos taken.

Your dislike of the royals has blinded you not see the difference between this case and crap celebs who does this on purpose.

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm

I don't understand, what's your point here?

Only one person started this thread.

Nevermind.


We disagree.

You like her, it's clear, which is fine she is a pretty girl, but if she didn't know what she was getting into by the marriage she is a fool.

PS:, my point is there is indignation about the photos being taken, yet it happens all the time to other celebrities/public figures and their wives, it is part of the territory........

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by SeeBass

This is a photo of a woman who has nothing and I repeat nothing to deserve having these photos taken.

Your dislike of the royals has blinded you not see the difference between this case and crap celebs who does this on purpose.

or you love of the royals has blinded you....see it goes both ways.

I learnt long ago that people has different opinions, so it's cool we don't agree.

[To Be Quite Honest]

[QUOTE=SeeBass;3865825]

Originally Posted by To Be Quite Honest

Strike it down as lesson learned. I am sure millions are being spent trying to take the pictures down. Nobody deserves it, but that doesn't mean you can't be more responsible with your image.[/QUOTE]

See what you are saying is absolute garbage.

These photos where taken about a 1/2 mile away with a major lens.

How dare you or anybody blame her for laying in a private yard far from the naked eyes of anyone

Obviously when you are "Royalty" and the technology available allows the paparazzi to take the picture and make money from them it changes things. You must not understand my use of responsible. If it can happen, and you don't want it to happen then don't do it. It's not a matter of right or wrong with the paparazzi as that is a separate issue.

If your on private land driving drunk it still not a good idea because something bad can still happen.

Again it's a lesson learned.

[Mean Mr. Mustard]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

or you love of the royals has blinded you....see it goes both ways.

I learnt long ago that people has different opinions, so it's cool we don't agree.

I am quite indifferent about the royal family seeing as though they have absolutely no impact to me in my life. That being said from a human standpoint, if someone doesn't want themselves to be photographed naked/topless and is in a private residence where one can be expected to have that expectation of privacy and someone photographs them, I can understand them being upset. This is no different than a peeping tom putting a camera in a ladies washroom or attempting to photograph under a ladies skirt.

Just because she is in the royal family doesn't mean that she should have no expectation of privacy at any point during her life.

[To Be Quite Honest]

Originally Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard

I am quite indifferent about the royal family seeing as though they have absolutely no impact to me in my life. That being said from a human standpoint, if someone doesn't want themselves to be photographed naked/topless and is in a private residence where one can be expected to have that expectation of privacy and someone photographs them, I can understand them being upset. This is no different than a peeping tom putting a camera in a ladies washroom or attempting to photograph under a ladies skirt.

Just because she is in the royal family doesn't mean that she should have no expectation of privacy at any point during her life.

I like that peeping tom remark. It would be great to have privacy laws in place.

I disagree about the royal family statement. Your life is completely public and it is your actions alone that make it private. Why do you think Depp lives in France where nobody cares who he is. There are islands where celebrities go to be free and private and they can do what they want away from the paparazzi.

To ignore the technology available and the demand in the market is very naive of Kate.

[polak]

Some of you are so sensitive.

Shes famous and got photographed naked. Did she deserve it? No. Is it her fault? Not really.

Will she live? Yes.

It's not like she was caught blowing the prince or taking part in an orgy. Yeah it's embarrassing but its just her boobs. Shes European for god sake, you see topless girls sunbathing in public regularly in Europe (its awesome).

This will literally affect her in no way; her PR, her bank account, her relationship, everything will stay the same.