Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
The Giants were gigantic.
I have no problem with home field being decided this way. Since teams don't play balanced schedules, comparing best records is apples and oranges.
|
I used to be of this mindset. I'm not a fan of unbalanced schedules, but that's a different debate.
Looking at this year's all star game, Verlander didn't pitch well. Bautista didn't defend against the triples.
I'm not putting the loss on those two individually. It's still a team game.
However, let's take Verlander for example, it was 5-0 after the top of the 1st inning. That's tough to come back against, let alone having to do that against a team full of all stars.
So now if LAA, TEX, CWS, NYY, TB or anyone but Detroit comes out of the AL no matter how well they played all season, no matter who comes out of the NL (could be the 2nd wildcard) they don't get home field advantage.
Should the 2nd wildcard of the NL get home field because Verlander pitched a bad game?
If all the players were at their best, or perhaps if it was an all-star series, then the bad game/bad plays would balance out.
Looking at last year's World Series, home field played a huge role in the outcome.
A one off game where players who aren't in your organization determine if you get home field or not?
I used to like it, heck even up until this year's game I said I liked it. Now, now I've changed my mind.
That said, if you still like it, all the power to you. I used to be like you. I won't hold it against you (I'd appreciate the same curtsy as at the end of the day we don't made these decisions... not that I mean you specifically troutman).
Just my two cents.