Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-21-2011, 12:15 PM   #1381
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
Bettman said something interesting about the gift clause in Arizona yesterday. A city government can't gift money to a private enterprise, where there is no commensurate consideration coming back.

COG would argue that the consideration coming back is tax revenues, parking, jobs etc. GI would argue that there is no reason Glendale would not generate revenues from new sources if the Coyotes left.
I don't believe the city can count alot of those 'revenues' as they are potential rather than guarenteed, in order to not break the law the city has to show a certain return that covers the bond issue, the law is clear, no matter how good an idea it is the city cannot loan a private company money unless it is guarenteed to get it back.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 12:55 PM   #1382
DownhillGoat
Franchise Player
 
DownhillGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
If team goes to WIN, Bettman would still want to locate a team in Phoenix.
WTF?
DownhillGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 12:58 PM   #1383
FlameFan
Farm Team Player
 
FlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
I will do what I want. Taylor has sources inside True North. Do you?

His reporting on this topic has been far more reliable than anyone out of Toronto.
personally speaking, as a past Winnipegger, and an ex Jets fan, I am really thankful that you're posting these.

Thanks muchly.
FlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 12:58 PM   #1384
calgaryred
Franchise Player
 
calgaryred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chilliwack, B.C
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kunkstyle View Post
WTF?
substitute WIN with Winnipeg
calgaryred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:09 PM   #1385
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

i dislike teflon gary as much as the next fella; however, i gotta give him some props for the fact that he always remains calm in an interview (as far as i can recall) and he seemingly has an answer for almost everything - seems like a bit of a contrast to colly coming unglued the other day 'cause he can't figure out how to get the wheel of justice to stop in the right place.....
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:13 PM   #1386
sevenarms
Powerplay Quarterback
 
sevenarms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_baby_burn View Post
I wonder if the Eastern teams would oppose such a move based on the Wings dominance for so long in the tougher Western Conference? The Eastern teams would probably beg for Columbous to be moved to the Eastern Conference.
Haha I could see it. But it's a money game and it all boils down to that. Detroit is a bigger draw than Atlanta/Columbus so I'm sure the Eastern teams (the ones that don't already sellout) would be stoked for the extra revenue.
__________________
"Somebody may beat me, but they are going to have to bleed to do it."
-Steve Prefontaine
sevenarms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:18 PM   #1387
DownhillGoat
Franchise Player
 
DownhillGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
If team goes to WIN, Bettman would still want to locate a team in Phoenix.
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryred View Post
substitute WIN with Winnipeg
Not sure if serious. It was the bolded part that the WTF was directed at. Moving a failing franchise to immediately place another franchise there. To, you know. Fail.
DownhillGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:23 PM   #1388
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kunkstyle View Post
Not sure if serious. It was the bolded part that the WTF was directed at. Moving a failing franchise to immediately place another franchise there. To, you know. Fail.
Yes, but Garys a lawyer and is all about precedent, which the move back to Winnipeg establishes.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:27 PM   #1389
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kunkstyle View Post
Not sure if serious. It was the bolded part that the WTF was directed at. Moving a failing franchise to immediately place another franchise there. To, you know. Fail.
There's Something About Market
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:35 PM   #1390
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kunkstyle View Post
Not sure if serious. It was the bolded part that the WTF was directed at. Moving a failing franchise to immediately place another franchise there. To, you know. Fail.
There are steps that the NHL could take to make the Phoenix market more viable for the NHL. They could endorse a minor hockey, try to help more rinks be built for public use and, perhaps most importantly, get second hand hockey equipment down to Phoenix or in some other way lower the cost of playing hockey.

Some solid grass roots programs along these lines could help butter the locals up for the next time the NHL tries to brute-force a franchise into a southern market.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:39 PM   #1391
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roughneck View Post
Covering up to $25M of their losses, which supposedly isn't enough.
Nonetheless, that is $25 million the BOG aren't responsible for. Any further losses, I suspect, the other owners will view as the cost of saving their ability to control franchise relocations.

But, I can't see this dragging into next year without a similar guarantee from Glendale. Lacking another such promise to cover losses, the Coyotes will have a new owner by the draft - whomever and wherever they may be.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:41 PM   #1392
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

What Phoenix needs ultimately is a team that actually wins and make the playoffs consistently enough (and get into the second round while there at it). No one is gonna love a loser, and that's what the Coyotes have been and why they're in this situation currently. No amount of grassroot development is gonna be effective if the NHL club doesn't give the market a reason to buy tickets. Who wants to watch them lose, even if you have an interest in hockey already developed?
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:49 PM   #1393
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joborule View Post
What Phoenix needs ultimately is a team that actually wins and make the playoffs consistently enough (and get into the second round while there at it). No one is gonna love a loser, and that's what the Coyotes have been and why they're in this situation currently. No amount of grassroot development is gonna be effective if the NHL club doesn't give the market a reason to buy tickets. Who wants to watch them lose, even if you have an interest in hockey already developed?
Phoenix IS a winning team. Frankly, if what is required is a team that is a annual threat to win the Stanley Cup then they ought to move the team right now because I'm pretty sure the Detroit Red Wings aren't moving and they're the only ones that seem to be able to pull that off. Everyone else goes through ups and downs and if Phoenix can't or won't support it through the downs then I don't think it's a market that ought to have an NHL franchise.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:51 PM   #1394
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joborule View Post
What Phoenix needs ultimately is a team that actually wins and make the playoffs consistently enough (and get into the second round while there at it). No one is gonna love a loser, and that's what the Coyotes have been and why they're in this situation currently. No amount of grassroot development is gonna be effective if the NHL club doesn't give the market a reason to buy tickets. Who wants to watch them lose, even if you have an interest in hockey already developed?
You think? Because Edmoton sells tickets, and they were eliminated from the playoffs before the season even started.

Interest in hockey counts for something.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:56 PM   #1395
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
You think? Because Edmoton sells tickets, and they were eliminated from the playoffs before the season even started.

Interest in hockey counts for something.
And in the late 90's in Edmonton?
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:57 PM   #1396
Flashpoint
Not the 1 millionth post winnar
 
Flashpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kunkstyle View Post
Not sure if serious. It was the bolded part that the WTF was directed at. Moving a failing franchise to immediately place another franchise there. To, you know. Fail.
Isn't that what they're doing with Winnipeg?
__________________
"Isles give up 3 picks for 5.5 mil of cap space.

Oilers give up a pick and a player to take on 5.5 mil."
-Bax
Flashpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 02:00 PM   #1397
calgaryred
Franchise Player
 
calgaryred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chilliwack, B.C
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow View Post
And in the late 90's in Edmonton?
Edmonton fans staying away in the 90's was more to do with fans rebelling against an owner, then poor play.
calgaryred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 02:01 PM   #1398
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joborule View Post
What Phoenix needs ultimately is a team that actually wins and make the playoffs consistently enough (and get into the second round while there at it). No one is gonna love a loser, and that's what the Coyotes have been and why they're in this situation currently. No amount of grassroot development is gonna be effective if the NHL club doesn't give the market a reason to buy tickets. Who wants to watch them lose, even if you have an interest in hockey already developed?
Well, now you are just proposing a "chicken or the egg" question. In order to love a team and pay to watch them play the team has to be a winner but how do you get enough money to make a team a winner when they are consistently losing money and relying on Vancouver fans to cry about how they have to pay for the Coyotes to play.

I guess the NHL could try something like force Crosby to be traded to the Coyotes.

Realistically though, I think you have to start up with the grass roots program just so you can have a reasonable base of fans to start the team with. 2000 fans just doesn't cut it and I'm sure most of them are Canadians that are snowbirding down to Phoenix.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 02:03 PM   #1399
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Nonetheless, that is $25 million the BOG aren't responsible for. Any further losses, I suspect, the other owners will view as the cost of saving their ability to control franchise relocations.

But, I can't see this dragging into next year without a similar guarantee from Glendale. Lacking another such promise to cover losses, the Coyotes will have a new owner by the draft - whomever and wherever they may be.
You would think the GI would be on this like a cat on spilled milk as this $25M, sure looks like a gift to me.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 02:06 PM   #1400
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
Phoenix IS a winning team. Frankly, if what is required is a team that is a annual threat to win the Stanley Cup then they ought to move the team right now because I'm pretty sure the Detroit Red Wings aren't moving and they're the only ones that seem to be able to pull that off. Everyone else goes through ups and downs and if Phoenix can't or won't support it through the downs then I don't think it's a market that ought to have an NHL franchise.
Phoenix has ALWAYS been in the downs, except maybe one year in the late 90s if I recall? They're now just getting into the playoffs when the franchise future is up in so much limbo. If the most news I hear about the Yotes is 'are they going or are they not', I'm not going to care to much about the club if I didn't have much of an interest in them in the first place during the regular season. That goes for a great percentage of the market down there.

The Coyotes need to get this resolved and show that they are sticking around for the time being so then the fanbase down there can showcase support to a winning club that isn't going to leave in a matter of months.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
You think? Because Edmoton sells tickets, and they were eliminated from the playoffs before the season even started.

Interest in hockey counts for something.
Oilers fanbase has been established over a period of 30 years and show signs of 'progress' in the future. How about you look at you very own Calgary Flames prior to the cup run? Fans don't come out to cheer for a team that just loses year in year out for a proloung period of time with nothing to look forward to in the near future. Unless your the Leafs or Habs, your days of sellouts and huge fan support are over if you were like the Flames during the Young Gunz era.
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy