Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-08-2011, 12:36 AM   #361
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazrim View Post
Should I email DCU and tell her she should have voted yes? (I wish I didn't live in Ward 13)
Can't hurt.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 06:55 AM   #362
ricosuave
Threadkiller
 
ricosuave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 51.0544° N, 114.0669° W
Exp:
Default

Nice...

Ald. John Mar was opposed: "We’re blowing our load on one infrastructure project."

Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Co...#ixzz1DNL562Mh
__________________
https://www.reddit.com/r/CalgaryFlames/
I’m always amazed these sportscasters and announcers can call the game with McDavid’s **** in their mouths all the time.
ricosuave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 07:24 AM   #363
FlameOn
Franchise Player
 
FlameOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I really wonder about those aldermen who voted against when Calgarians overwhelmingly voted for a mayor whose platform was overwhelmingly for. From what this thread is showing, those seem to be the un-prepared, the divas and jerks
FlameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 07:29 AM   #364
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Wasn't McIver pro-tunderpass as well? So by that logic a very large part of the voting public was trying to elect an official that was going to push to have this built.

Oh and John Mar, you become more and more useless every single day.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 07:58 AM   #365
Superflyer
Close, but no banana.
 
Superflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Hate-Hulse View Post
Holy Crap Mar is a clusterfata. He seems like that guy in every group that brings up the obscure and useless just to appear like he's relevant and "contributing"

Mar just says he thinks the tunnel is going through.

Stevens just beeyach slaps Mar, calling him out on a useless motion (on consulting the community on public engagement)
SO he's the Pierre McGuire of city council?
Superflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 08:02 AM   #366
kirant
Franchise Player
 
kirant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricosuave View Post
Nice...

Ald. John Mar was opposed: "We’re blowing our load on one infrastructure project."

Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Co...#ixzz1DNL562Mh
What a horrible choice of words (Though, he does have a point, no matter how bluntly he put it)

Quote:
For - Stevenson, Jones, Pootmans, Carra, Chabot, Keating, Demong, Nenshi
Opposed - Hodges, Lowe, MacLeod, Farrell, Mar, Pincott, Colley-Urquhart
The bold was enough reason for me to support it though.
__________________
kirant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 08:13 AM   #367
FlameOn
Franchise Player
 
FlameOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirant View Post
What a horrible choice of words (Though, he does have a point, no matter how bluntly he put it).
I know eh? Real classy Mar.
I'm surprised the papers didn't really try to rephrase it or censor it somehow.
FlameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 08:21 AM   #368
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'm not surprised. This is the same guy that was all over twitter during the election, then threw a hissy fit when a couple of people accused him of not replying to messages in a timely fashion, so he took his ball and went home:

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mar's twitter feed
Apparently, there's some hostility regarding my apparent inability to respond to tweets in a 'timely' fashion. So long twiiterville.
That was back on December 6, 2010.

So compare that response to Nenshi's twitter exchange with that girl that told him to "f*&k you already". Really shows the HUGE difference in class and attitude between the two:

NSFW!

Last edited by Bigtime; 02-08-2011 at 08:25 AM.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
Old 02-08-2011, 09:24 AM   #369
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Glad to see this pass and we can finally get this thing built.

Whats up with those that opposed the build it? Shows how short-sided they are and have no clue what this project really means. That or if they aren't getting stuff done in their ward, they don't want to do anything with it. Selfish nincompoops.
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 09:33 AM   #370
FlameOn
Franchise Player
 
FlameOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joborule View Post
Glad to see this pass and we can finally get this thing built.

Whats up with those that opposed the build it? Shows how short-sided they are and have no clue what this project really means. That or if they aren't getting stuff done in their ward, they don't want to do anything with it. Selfish nincompoops.
Lets hope so... this really concerns me though

Quote:
City manager Owen Tobert noted the municipality will back away if the final terms are too much for the city to accept.
"We’ve tried to say . . . this is our limit and no more," he said.

FlameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 09:44 AM   #371
frinkprof
First Line Centre
 
frinkprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

^I think that's one of those things that has to be said. Of course they aren't going to push ahead at absolutely any cost.
frinkprof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 10:29 AM   #372
llama64
First Line Centre
 
llama64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joborule View Post
Glad to see this pass and we can finally get this thing built.

Whats up with those that opposed the build it? Shows how short-sided they are and have no clue what this project really means. That or if they aren't getting stuff done in their ward, they don't want to do anything with it. Selfish nincompoops.
Just ONE reason I didn't vote for John Mar as my alderman. Seems all he cares about is police funding and his yappy little dog.

Tunnel has to to be built eventually - why wait till it's quadruple the cost? That's the attitude that has held Calgary back for decades. Glad to see common sense is slowly forging ahead.
llama64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 10:37 AM   #373
frinkprof
First Line Centre
 
frinkprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

^Mar's closest opponent (and who some have thought would win the seat if Mar switches to Provincial or Federal politics), Zak Pashak has shown himself to be completely unprofessional and unbecoming in voicing his opposition to the tunnel. He's gone off the deep end. Check out his twitter feed:

http://twitter.com/zakpashak
frinkprof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 10:45 AM   #374
bomber317
Powerplay Quarterback
 
bomber317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof View Post
^Mar's closest opponent (and who some have thought would win the seat if Mar switches to Provincial or Federal politics), Zak Pashak has shown himself to be completely unprofessional and unbecoming in voicing his opposition to the tunnel. He's gone off the deep end. Check out his twitter feed:

http://twitter.com/zakpashak
I didn't vote for Mar, only voted for Zak because he was not Mar but had my reservations about Zak as well. Particularly his campaign targeting the Bridge. Between the new Devil and the Devil you know.....
bomber317 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 11:09 AM   #375
Mazrim
CP Gamemaster
 
Mazrim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof View Post
Ugh, how painful to read. I would expect something less ignorant and shortsighted from someone people were touting heavily during the election.

My favorite part was his retweet of some guy in the SE who now says the NE is being favored all the time and the SE ignored...lol.
Mazrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 11:13 AM   #376
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'm not even a big airport tunderpass supporter (I'm all about the parallel runway and new terminal going ASAP) but Pashak's remarks over the last few days have me feeling regret for voting for him.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 06:20 PM   #377
shermanator
Franchise Player
 
shermanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof View Post
^Mar's closest opponent (and who some have thought would win the seat if Mar switches to Provincial or Federal politics), Zak Pashak has shown himself to be completely unprofessional and unbecoming in voicing his opposition to the tunnel. He's gone off the deep end. Check out his twitter feed:

http://twitter.com/zakpashak
Ugh! Definitely regretting voting for him now....
With this development, and Mar being a useless tit in the Airport Tunnel debate, I really hope a new candidate steps up next election. Maybe I will hve to run....
__________________

shermanator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 06:36 PM   #378
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shermanator View Post
Ugh! Definitely regretting voting for him now....
Meh, you can still consider your vote as a protest vote.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 06:58 PM   #379
pepper24
Franchise Player
 
pepper24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Unfortunately with the unsustainable suburban sprawl of the city we have to spend a lot of money updating, adding and maintaining infrastructure. The only big winners are the developers while the taxpayers and city end up paying for years.
pepper24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 10:12 AM   #380
I-Hate-Hulse
Franchise Player
 
I-Hate-Hulse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

For those you who think The Other Guy would have done differently you might be disappointed. Even Dr No would have been Dr Yes on this issue - always has been.

Quote:
If a large city project gets delayed for too long, it can become so expensive and cumbersome to complete, that it can be delayed for decades. Such is the case with the southwest connector from Anderson Road to Highway 8. Other big projects have been promised. None of them are higher priority than commitments to build the Airport Trail extension (tunnel) and the southeast LRT. Today, both projects look to be in jeopardy for very different reasons.

Credit needs to be given to Ald. Jim Stevenson, Mayor Naheed Nenshi and several other members of council who have made great strides in bringing the Airport tunnel project to fruition. They served notice on the Calgary Airport Authority of their intentions. The government of Alberta was pressed for financial support in short order and said no based on the fact council spent most of the 10-year Municipal Sustainability Initiative dollars on other projects.
http://www.calgaryherald.com/story_p...13028&sponsor=[/quote]
I-Hate-Hulse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy