Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum > Tech Talk
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2010, 07:12 AM   #61
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by psicodude View Post
The reason I was asking is that I am the technical lead on a project that requires us to deploy 300+ laptops in a school environment.
...
So, to make a long story short, I really just wanted to know if the resources used by the free solutions were similar to what the big boys are.
A lot of the free products, like Avast and Dr Web do not allow use in settings you are describing, but there are some that do. I think MS Security Essentials is one of these.

I use Security Essentials at home, and I just tested a full scan amd it seems to take about 200 Megs of RAM, even though it came up as an Internet Explorer process (iexplore.exe). I am actually not very happy with those numbers, especially on my wife's machine which only has a Gig of RAM. Passively it takes up 2 mb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube View Post
Avast is taking up 40MB of memory
Is that while scanning? or while in passive mode?
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."

Last edited by Rathji; 03-07-2010 at 07:16 AM.
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2010, 03:52 PM   #62
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

I've been running Kaspersky with everything enabled, for the last week or so. I've noticed no slow down in performance, and there hasn't been a single annoying message all this time.

Just checked the resources, and it's currently using 16MB of ram. That's with everything turned on.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2010, 04:46 PM   #63
OilKiller
Lifetime Suspension
 
OilKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Yep, Kaspersky is solid. For paid AV's, that's what I would go with and what I am personally running.
OilKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2010, 05:43 PM   #64
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

I 3rd the use of CC cleaner. A great, free tool that is simple to run and really helps your computer run smoother.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2010, 11:18 PM   #65
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Oilkiller, what's your take on having more than one anti-virus or anti-malware on your system? Most places tell you not to do it as they will conflict with each other. I currently have Malwarebytes, Ad-Aware and Avast and it seems okay, although Ad-Aware and Avast both take an active role.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 06:18 AM   #66
OilKiller
Lifetime Suspension
 
OilKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Some are meant to work alongside others, like Malwarebytes for example. Your setup is fine, although I don't know that much about Ad-Aware. Have you checked their forums to see if it can run alongside something like Avast? I am assuming you are running Malwarebytes on demand and not the Pro version in realtime mode?
OilKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OilKiller For This Useful Post:
Old 03-08-2010, 06:43 AM   #67
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
Oilkiller, what's your take on having more than one anti-virus or anti-malware on your system? Most places tell you not to do it as they will conflict with each other. I currently have Malwarebytes, Ad-Aware and Avast and it seems okay, although Ad-Aware and Avast both take an active role.
I know adaware and malware bytes are designed to be run in conjunction with anti-virus programs, but I am not sure how they work together. Since you are running the free version of Malware Bytes (it seems at least) there is probably no problems whatsoever. Given the choice between purchasing Malware Bytes and Adaware, or both,I would probably just go with MBAM.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rathji For This Useful Post:
Old 03-08-2010, 01:24 PM   #68
OilKiller
Lifetime Suspension
 
OilKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Yep, agreed. MBAM is a great product. I purchased the Pro version simply because it catches things that Kaspersky and Avast do not when running alongside. Layered protection is best IMO.
OilKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 09:58 PM   #69
kdogg
Scoring Winger
 
kdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Is CCleaner okay to run on a machine's registry???

I found a decent amount of problems, but a little hesitant to fix all.
________
Park Royal 2 Condo Prathumnak

Last edited by kdogg; 08-17-2011 at 04:03 PM.
kdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 10:06 PM   #70
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg View Post
Is CCleaner okay to run on a machine's registry???

I found a decent amount of problems, but a little hesitant to fix all.
If you do, it prompts you to back it up, so always do it. I have never had a problem stem from it though, and I run it on every machine I do anything on at work.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 09:39 AM   #71
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg View Post
Is CCleaner okay to run on a machine's registry???

I found a decent amount of problems, but a little hesitant to fix all.
I don't backup and I've never had a problem with it.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:46 PM   #72
FlamingStuffedTiger
Backup Goalie
 
FlamingStuffedTiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Found a pretty funny article while browsing today:

http://grack.com/blog/2010/03/17/the...us-heuristics/

Anti-virus enthusiasts will probably find it rather amusing, but I'm sure others might find it more terrifying

Last edited by FlamingStuffedTiger; 03-17-2010 at 10:52 PM.
FlamingStuffedTiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:59 PM   #73
Hack&Lube
Atomic Nerd
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji View Post
A lot of the free products, like Avast and Dr Web do not allow use in settings you are describing, but there are some that do. I think MS Security Essentials is one of these.

I use Security Essentials at home, and I just tested a full scan amd it seems to take about 200 Megs of RAM, even though it came up as an Internet Explorer process (iexplore.exe). I am actually not very happy with those numbers, especially on my wife's machine which only has a Gig of RAM. Passively it takes up 2 mb

Is that while scanning? or while in passive mode?
Yeah, you're right, deploying in a school or corporate environement will be violating the terms of the free agreements for the home versions of Avast and Dr. Web.

Avast is eating up between 30-40MB of memory when idling in my task bar but it is working hard at intercepting stuff before it gets to me. It's been catching malicious code on regular webpages that were seemingly innocuous to me.
Hack&Lube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 11:26 PM   #74
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

It's been almost two weeks since I last checked, and Kaspersky is still only using 16MB of RAM, with every setting and background task enabled. First time I've ever been impressed with an anti-virus app.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 12:13 AM   #75
I-Hate-Hulse
Franchise Player
 
I-Hate-Hulse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

Futureshop has Kaspersky 2010 Internet Security for $29.99 this weekend. It's the 3 license version. Great deal.
I-Hate-Hulse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 09:14 AM   #76
OilKiller
Lifetime Suspension
 
OilKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Hate-Hulse View Post
Futureshop has Kaspersky 2010 Internet Security for $29.99 this weekend. It's the 3 license version. Great deal.
The anti virus is much lighter than the full Internet Security, so be careful. I personally am not a fan of the full IS as it seems pretty heavy on the system to me.
OilKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 11:14 PM   #77
I-Hate-Hulse
Franchise Player
 
I-Hate-Hulse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

The actual scanning engine is the same no? I have no need for the additional IS features and will disable them.
I-Hate-Hulse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 11:25 PM   #78
OilKiller
Lifetime Suspension
 
OilKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Hate-Hulse View Post
The actual scanning engine is the same no? I have no need for the additional IS features and will disable them.
One would think so. The whole suite is just heavy IMO. I guess you could disable the rest, or just buy the AV.
OilKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 08:26 AM   #79
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Yeah the Anti-Virus one is all you need. It has other stuff with it besides AV (which is good), but the IS suite is too much.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 06:59 PM   #80
ricosuave
Threadkiller
 
ricosuave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 51.0544° N, 114.0669° W
Exp:
Default

Here is some more info
http://www.virusbtn.com/index

__________________
https://www.reddit.com/r/CalgaryFlames/
I’m always amazed these sportscasters and announcers can call the game with McDavid’s **** in their mouths all the time.
ricosuave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy