Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-23-2009, 05:46 PM   #81
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Yup Allied got it. I'm speechless, even in the Sun's poll it was at the bottom end of votes.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 05:49 PM   #82
octothorp
Franchise Player
 
octothorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Yup Allied got it. I'm speechless, even in the Sun's poll it was at the bottom end of votes.
For the first time in my life I'm actually wishing a poll in the Sun had some clout.
octothorp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 06:29 PM   #83
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Wow, that really sucks. Allied is so uninspiring. I wouldve been happy with basically any of the proposals except for that one.

We have an Allied work in NY....and everyone hates it. Unfortunately, it looks a lot like their Cantos proposal.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 07:53 PM   #84
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NiklasSundblad View Post
^^ a full third of those proposals are direct ripoffs of Calatrava's past work. At the very least his own design for the Peace Bridge isn't derivative of himself.

Are you suggesting a Calatrava bridge is ok as long as he didn't design it?
I am okay with Calatrava designs provided they are fairly tendered. And in a lot of cases I buy no name products at the grocery store when they are equal to the brand name equivalants.

To me the paper clip bridge is amazing regardless of who designed it.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 10:35 PM   #85
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Wow, that really sucks. Allied is so uninspiring. I wouldve been happy with basically any of the proposals except for that one.

We have an Allied work in NY....and everyone hates it. Unfortunately, it looks a lot like their Cantos proposal.
I was at the VIP event tonight, and I was taken by surprise with this decision. I've learned why the building was chosen, which I didn't necessarily agree with; nevertheless, the design isn't terrible... but there were other, more inspiring, submissions out there.
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 07:23 AM   #86
Madman
Franchise Player
 
Madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
I've learned why the building was chosen, which I didn't necessarily agree with
You can't drop that and then leave without explaining.

Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 08:16 AM   #87
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Come on Muta, we need more than that! I'd love even the most simple explanation of why Allied got this over the others.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 08:42 AM   #88
COGENT
Powerplay Quarterback
 
COGENT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Exp:
Default

It's sad to say but I'm not the least bit surpirsed that Allied got the gig. Calgary and even Alberta for that matter, seems to always have great intentions but when it comes down to it, misses the mark. I must admit though, it is getting better.

Oh well. There are certainly worse alternatives, it just sucks to see what could have been.
COGENT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 08:53 AM   #89
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Which one is the "Allied" one.

I dont see it listed on the skyscraper page.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 08:57 AM   #90
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Once again, design in Calgary is sacrificed for the easy, conservative "look".

Function over form continues to rule the roost when it comes to Calgary architecture.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:00 AM   #91
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

I would imagine they were picked because they would be the easiest and smoothest to work with, not necessarily because their design was the best.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:03 AM   #92
COGENT
Powerplay Quarterback
 
COGENT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
Which one is the "Allied" one.

I dont see it listed on the skyscraper page.
you can see the 5 here.
http://cantos.ca/kingeddy/meet-the-architects/
COGENT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:11 AM   #93
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I must be blind, I dont see a picture of the bridge design that won. Just the architect and their proposal for a music centre.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:12 AM   #94
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Certainly not the most spectacular on the outside, but good materials would make it look really good.

For the inside, The SPF and the Allied Works ones were the two that were the most thought out, IMO. I don't think we are losing any interior quality with this choice.

Seeing the new night rendering of the outside has upped my opinion of the outside as well, not that I thought the outside looked bad.

The SPF was a sweet building though. Would have been a real landmark, IMO. But this building will still be a great addition to the city of Calgary.

For the variety of things Cantos does, the design of the interior was really important, and they figured that the Allied Works proposal met their goals the best.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:17 AM   #95
Barnes
Franchise Player
 
Barnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
I must be blind, I dont see a picture of the bridge design that won. Just the architect and their proposal for a music centre.
Haha.. Yeah, this thread used to be about the bridge. Now it's about Cantos.
Barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:25 AM   #96
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
I was at the VIP event tonight, and I was taken by surprise with this decision. I've learned why the building was chosen, which I didn't necessarily agree with; nevertheless, the design isn't terrible... but there were other, more inspiring, submissions out there.
You mean decisions at City Hall are made via influence peddling and personal gain? Colour me shocked.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:32 AM   #97
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Come on Muta, we need more than that! I'd love even the most simple explanation of why Allied got this over the others.
I'll make it short and sweet - Allied Works designed a building that apparently made best use of the physical manifestation / representation of 'music', their concept was visionary in this sense, etc. etc. I thought the others were just as strong, if not stronger in this regard.

I wasn't too impressed with Allied's use of the King Eddy; DS+F's use was far more impressive. It also seems that some alterations were made to Allied's design regarding the +15 and the rooftop portion of the King Eddy, but I could be wrong.

IMO, this was the most conservative conept out of all the shortlisted designs. Initially I had an issue with the way light would be allowed into the building; the concept reminded me of all the education / government buildings next to the river just north of City Hall.

After seeing some of the renderings, I'm warming up to the idea; but still, I preferred other submissions out there.

No discredit to Allied Works, though; they've done some beautiful stuff otherwise. If anyone has a chance, take a look at their website and check out their building portfolio.
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:35 AM   #98
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam View Post
You mean decisions at City Hall are made via influence peddling and personal gain? Colour me shocked.
Definitely food for thought.
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:35 AM   #99
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam View Post
You mean decisions at City Hall are made via influence peddling and personal gain? Colour me shocked.
City Hall didn't make the decision. It was Cantos Music Foundation.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 09:43 AM   #100
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Exterior material will make or break the design.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bridge , children , future , mouthbreathing


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:24 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy