Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-15-2009, 12:10 PM   #21
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default



Weld this, screw in that, they'll all pay.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 12:11 PM   #22
VladtheImpaler
Franchise Player
 
VladtheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDVAN View Post
Why don't they just use robots?
__________________
Cordially as always,
Vlad the Impaler

Please check out http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...94#post3726494

VladtheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 12:12 PM   #23
REDVAN
Franchise Player
 
REDVAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Still, I for one would welcome our robot overlords.

Hello, the Matrix is flippin' sweet!
__________________
REDVAN!
REDVAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 12:22 PM   #24
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDVAN View Post
Still, I for one would welcome our robot overlords.

Hello, the Matrix is flippin' sweet!


Dare to dream, Redvan.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bobblehead For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2009, 12:27 PM   #25
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead View Post
The people I've spoken to think they are screwed regardless.

They believe that in the next few years, their plant will be shipped offshore no matter what wage concessions they make.

The story that was recounted to me was a couple years ago Chrysler was going to end one of the shifts in Windsor, but the gov't ended up giving them(Chrysler Canada) money on the condition that the 2nd shift remain running. Today that plant is down to one shift, and Chrysler is asking more money to keep the plant open. The workers themselves know the plants are in deep trouble (who knows what the union brass think), but they do not believe that the concessions they make are going to save their job.

Their point of view is they can work for $55/hr or they can work for $15/hr until the plant relocates, and the plant is going to relocate. Why should they work for less if they do not believe it will save their job?
There's your problem right there.
Th union doesn't realize that they are the reason the plants aren't sustainalbe, and that they are the reason the plants will leave.
If they do take large enough concessions, the plants will stay.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 12:45 PM   #26
REDVAN
Franchise Player
 
REDVAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead View Post

Dare to dream, Redvan.


Ah, if only we could go back to the glory days of Chrysler!
__________________
REDVAN!
REDVAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 12:46 PM   #27
BlackArcher101
Such a pretty girl!
 
BlackArcher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The $55/hr isn't the wage, it's the total labor cost to the company... that includes the wage, benefits, vacation, break time, pension, training, and overhead.
__________________
BlackArcher101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 12:48 PM   #28
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDVAN View Post


Ah, if only we could go back to the glory days of Chrysler!
I learned how to drive on a red 1992 Plymouth Voyager. Handled like a dream, I tells ya. A dream.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to peter12 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2009, 12:49 PM   #29
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

As usual, it's the grunts who are bringing the whole thing crashing down.
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 12:59 PM   #30
Finny61
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Finny61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackArcher101 View Post
The $55/hr isn't the wage, it's the total labor cost to the company... that includes the wage, benefits, vacation, break time, pension, training, and overhead.
Training...haha good one.
Finny61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 02:01 PM   #31
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck View Post
Isn't it up to the union leaders to propose making the concessions under the condition that the plants remain where they currently are, thus saving jobs?

I think unions in general have become too powerful, and need to be busted apart.
Yup.

This is where the union gets the government involved and plants a requirement that says we take pay cut if you guarantee plant stays open, and government here will ensure that what is promised happens.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 10:30 PM   #32
longsuffering
First Line Centre
 
longsuffering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz View Post
If they do take large enough concessions, the plants will stay.
Darn right! If they'd work for as little as the Chinese we wouldn't have this problem.

It's funny that so many posters write as though they're experts on this issue yet can't grasp the fact that autoworkers are not getting paid $74 or $55 per hour.
longsuffering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 10:40 PM   #33
Dan02
Franchise Player
 
Dan02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering View Post
Darn right! If they'd work for as little as the Chinese we wouldn't have this problem.

It's funny that so many posters write as though they're experts on this issue yet can't grasp the fact that autoworkers are not getting paid $74 or $55 per hour.
I think most of us understand that their take home pay isn't 74$ a hour.
Dan02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 10:50 PM   #34
Clarkey
Lifetime Suspension
 
Clarkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering View Post
Darn right! If they'd work for as little as the Chinese we wouldn't have this problem.

It's funny that so many posters write as though they're experts on this issue yet can't grasp the fact that autoworkers are not getting paid $74 or $55 per hour.
What do you think a fair take home pay for repetitive non-skilled labour is... $10, $15, $20, $30, $40 bucks an hour? I think minimum wage is currently something like $8.50 and hour in Alberta.
Clarkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 10:59 PM   #35
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz View Post
There's your problem right there.
Th union doesn't realize that they are the reason the plants aren't sustainalbe, and that they are the reason the plants will leave.
If they do take large enough concessions, the plants will stay.
Yea, but the real problem is that the unions have been blocking the automakers (no, I'm not absolving the execs of all responsibility, just some of it) from making the plants more efficient, ie: using robots.

The CAW has spent decades blocking the big 3 from making their plants more efficient because it eliminates union jobs. That is my biggest problem with unions. If they would understand that as technology advances, some of them would have to (ideally be retrained but ultimately) get new jobs, then the union would remain healthy.

Union mentality = love your co-worker
Union Boss mentality = 19th century

Call me a rubbernecker, but I can't wait to see the fallout from one of the big 3 actually going bankrupt.

Right now they're fighting as useless a battle as the NHLPA did in '04. We can all see now that some scrubs lost their jobs, but the truly useful ones are making as much money as ever. The CAW needs to realize that they're a 20th century fighter against a 21st century juggernaut.
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2009, 08:28 AM   #36
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering View Post
Darn right! If they'd work for as little as the Chinese we wouldn't have this problem.

It's funny that so many posters write as though they're experts on this issue yet can't grasp the fact that autoworkers are not getting paid $74 or $55 per hour.

Where did I say that?
I realize that they aren't making that much, but that's not the point.
To make cuts large enough it's more than just the hourly wage.
They'll have to take cuts on their pension, on their benefits packages, hell, for all we know they get 8 weeks vacation, maybe they'll have to cut back no that.

The fact is that Japanese companies have been doing pretty well lately building cars in NA, but for some reason the big 3 can't compete. What's the difference, for starters there's the union until that union finds a way to bring their total labour cost (notice I didn't say hourly wage) in line, then they're digging their own grave.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2009, 08:41 AM   #37
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering View Post
Darn right! If they'd work for as little as the Chinese we wouldn't have this problem.

It's funny that so many posters write as though they're experts on this issue yet can't grasp the fact that autoworkers are not getting paid $74 or $55 per hour.
You do know that the actual hourly pay is irrelevant in this case, its what the company is paying out in total compensation.

So the union members need to make a choice about what part of that package they can live without. The pension? The salary, portions of their paid vacation, their dental plan for example.

But a total compensation plan of about $150,000 per year for a factory worker in a depressed economy in a dying industry is the first place that you have to look since there are thousands upon thousands of these positions.

I was watching the news this morning and they interviewed a lady that had just been laid off, her and her husband were line workers for GM. They were living in a very large very nicely furnished house as she worked on a shiny new laptop, and both her and her husband were driving new high end super powerfull pickup trucks.

And she said that the problem wasn't with the workers and they shouldn't have to give anymore. It just seemed to be such a golden goose killing moment.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2009, 08:48 AM   #38
VladtheImpaler
Franchise Player
 
VladtheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I was watching the news this morning and they interviewed a lady that had just been laid off, her and her husband were line workers for GM. They were living in a very large very nicely furnished house as she worked on a shiny new laptop, and both her and her husband were driving new high end super powerfull pickup trucks.

And she said that the problem wasn't with the workers and they shouldn't have to give anymore. It just seemed to be such a golden goose killing moment.
Well, now she can move on to that job at Tim Horton's that she is ideally qualified for. The mindless proles in NA better realize that there are millions upon millions mindless proles in China, Indonesia, India and Vietnam (among others) that can do the same thing for a fraction of the cost.
__________________
Cordially as always,
Vlad the Impaler

Please check out http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...94#post3726494

VladtheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2009, 09:22 AM   #39
TimSJ
First Line Centre
 
TimSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Saint John, NB
Exp:
Default

The latest rumor is that Fiat will back away from the Chrysler deal (if the unions don't come to the table) and buy Saturn.. Which really would likely be a better fit.
__________________

TimSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2009, 09:51 AM   #40
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimSJ View Post
The latest rumor is that Fiat will back away from the Chrysler deal (if the unions don't come to the table) and buy Saturn.. Which really would likely be a better fit.
Yup pretty harsh words from Fiat's CEO. If this deal falls through for Chrysler all bets are off concerning government funding and Chrysler probably gets broken up and sold off.

I think the deadline is the 30th of April.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy