| 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 07:53 PM | #2 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: still in edmonton      | 
 
			
			That's disgusting. Ethnocentrism be damned.  That is wrong.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Yeah_Baby For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 08:02 PM | #3 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: In the Sin Bin      | 
 
			
			Batshart crazy muslims.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 08:05 PM | #4 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Still have to yell surprise first though
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Ducay For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 08:31 PM | #5 |  
	| Don't click that link! 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Rural Alberta      | 
 
			
			This paves the way for legalizing hookers and blow locally?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to alan21 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 08:35 PM | #6 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Cheese  Afghanistan's President, Hamid Karzai, has signed a law which "legalises" rape, women's groups and the United Nations warn. Critics claim the president helped rush the bill through parliament in a bid to appease Islamic fundamentalists ahead of elections in August.
 		In a massive blow for women's rights, the new Shia Family Law negates the need for sexual consent between married couples, tacitly approves child marriage and restricts a woman's right to leave the home, according to UN papers seen by The Independent.
New law |  
Absolutely revolting. How much worse would that place be if there weren't NATO troops on every street corner. I can't even imagine the horrors that go on outside the relative modernity and safety of the cities.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to peter12 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 08:55 PM | #7 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			It is revolting, but I can only imagine the horrors women go through in that country every single day.  I don't think it will ever change.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 08:55 PM | #8 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Income Tax Central      | 
 
			
			Do they mandate the use of lube, or is Allah against that too?
		 
				__________________The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
 
 This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
 
 The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
 
 If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 09:19 PM | #9 |  
	| Redundant Minister of Redundancy 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Montreal      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Locke  Do they mandate the use of lube, or is Allah against that too? |  
Only if its bacon flavoured.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 09:24 PM | #10 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Calgary, Alberta      | 
 
			
			You have got to be kidding me.
 You have got to be kidding me!
 
 Legalize Rape? God some people are absolutely backwards and disgusting.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 09:38 PM | #11 |  
	| Redundant Minister of RedundancySelf-Banned
 | 
 
			
			Does this really surprise anyone?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 09:42 PM | #12 |  
	| wins 10 internets 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: slightly to the left      | 
 
			
			this is why i have no sympathy for Muslims who complain of feeling persecuted. their "religion of peace" deserves every ounce of criticism it gets. what a sham
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 10:07 PM | #13 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda  this is why i have no sympathy for Muslims who complain of feeling persecuted. their "religion of peace" deserves every ounce of criticism it gets. what a sham |  
I am reporting you to the UN Human Rights Council. You are NO LONGER ALLOWED to criticize religion. Especially, the Religion of Peace!!!
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 10:09 PM | #14 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Creston      | 
 
			
			"The most controversial parts of the law deal explicitly with sexual relations. Article 132 requires women to obey their husband's sexual demands and stipulates that a man can expect to have sex with his wife at least "once every four nights" when travelling, unless they are ill. The law also gives men preferential inheritance rights, easier access to divorce, and priority in court."
 The article doesn't give a direct quotation of the law(translated to English). Above is the most specific the article gets concerning the content of the law. It doesn't sound good for women but, I'm not sure it actually sanctions rape.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 10:12 PM | #15 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Calgary AB      | 
 
			
			Women seriously need to look at taking law into their own hands, why don't they pick it up and rape some guys like the amazon chicks. Anyway hearing about this legalization is insane, society somewhere moving backwards.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 10:48 PM | #16 |  
	| First Line Centre 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Calgary      | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Calgaryborn  The article doesn't give a direct quotation of the law(translated to English). Above is the most specific the article gets concerning the content of the law. It doesn't sound good for women but, I'm not sure it actually sanctions rape. |  
HUH? Give your head a shake. 
  
Try running it past your wife.
 
 
 
	Funny, I don't see the words CONSENT or CONSENTUAL in there.
 
 
rape1 
–nounQuote: 
	
		| "The most controversial parts of the law deal explicitly with sexual relations. Article 132 requires women to obey their husband's sexual demands and stipulates that a man can expect to have sex with his wife at least "once every four nights" when travelling, unless they are ill. |  
1.the unlawful compelling of a woman through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse. 
2.any act of sexual intercourse that is forced upon a person. 
3.statutory rape. 
4.an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation: the rape of the countryside. 
5.Archaic . the act of seizing and carrying off by force.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to First Lady For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 10:53 PM | #17 |  
	| Redundant Minister of RedundancySelf-Banned
 | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by First Lady  Try running it past your wife.
 
 
 |  
I tried.  Didn't go over very well.  I can't say for sure, but I think derisive laughter (and angry eyes) mean it's a "no".  
 
Couch looks comfy though.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CrusaderPi For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 10:54 PM | #18 |  
	| My face is a bum! | 
 
			
			Support our troops.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 10:58 PM | #19 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Lethbridge      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Calgaryborn  "The most controversial parts of the law deal explicitly with sexual relations. Article 132 requires women to obey their husband's sexual demands and stipulates that a man can expect to have sex with his wife at least "once every four nights" when travelling, unless they are ill. The law also gives men preferential inheritance rights, easier access to divorce, and priority in court."
 The article doesn't give a direct quotation of the law(translated to English). Above is the most specific the article gets concerning the content of the law. It doesn't sound good for women but, I'm not sure it actually sanctions rape.
 |  
It doesn't sanction rape but it is a lot more sensational to phrase it like that.
 
The law is obviously stupid and not great for women but "legalized rape" is a pretty misleading phrase and really an outright lie.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-31-2009, 11:04 PM | #20 |  
	| First Line Centre 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by moon  It doesn't sanction rape but it is a lot more sensational to phrase it like that.
 The law is obviously stupid and not great for women but "legalized rape" is a pretty misleading phrase and really an outright lie.
 |  
Really, hmmm. Let's see.
  
The women must "obey" sexual "demands" and there is no need for "consent".
  
Only valid reason for her not obeying his demands for sex is illness.
  
What about the nights she just doesn't plain "feel like it"?  
With this law he is within his rights to take (rape) what is "legally" his.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 AM. | 
 
 
 |