Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 03-16-2021, 09:07 AM   #9141
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
I am wondering if the Flames would have interest in Sam Reinhart. RS top 6 forward who might slot in nicely with SM and JG.

Every indication is that Buffalo is going to have to hit the reset button on their rebuild and start over. It's going to get worse before it gets better there. Can the Flames pry Rienhart out without having to give up much off of the current roster? Could a mix of pics, prospects (not named Zary or Pelettier), and Kylington be enough? Perhaps I am squinting a bit here, but I wonder if the Flames are showcasing Kylington at the moment. Would a 1st, Kylington, and prospect be enough/too much?

It seems to me, and I don't think I am alone, but the biggest need is a RS top 6 forward for the team. With the quarantine rules being what they are, I doubt the Flames will want to give up active roster players. By building a package around futures, which should be of interest the Sabres, the Flames might be able to add Reinhard without having to sacrifice from the current roster.

For further context, I firmly believe based on recent public comments made by Sutter that he came back to win a cup, and with he and Treliving having two years left after this one, that the Flames could start to leverage picks and prospects here in short order.
It's not possible.

The Flames have less than $1M available under the cap right now. So they would have to send more than $4M back the other way. Who would that be?

Even if they wait until the deadline, they would have to send more than $3M back. And then Reinhart would have to quarantine for 2 weeks, leaving only a handful of games left.

Even if the cap could work, would you seriously give up Kylington, a prospect and a 1st for 10-20 games of Reinhart?
Enoch Root is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 09:10 AM   #9142
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
Bennett + 2021 2nd for Mantha.
Keep Bennett, let him have another awesome playoffs under Sutter, which makes Seattle select him while we keep Kylington.
MrMike is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 09:15 AM   #9143
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
It's not possible.

The Flames have less than $1M available under the cap right now. So they would have to send more than $4M back the other way. Who would that be?

Even if they wait until the deadline, they would have to send more than $3M back. And then Reinhart would have to quarantine for 2 weeks, leaving only a handful of games left.

Even if the cap could work, would you seriously give up Kylington, a prospect and a 1st for 10-20 games of Reinhart?
I think it would make more sense in the off-season. He is an RFA so you would have some control over the situation.
__________________
Wolfman is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 09:18 AM   #9144
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman View Post
I think it would make more sense in the off-season. He is an RFA so you would have some control over the situation.
I would consider Bennett + 2nd in the off-season.

The problem with that though, is that you would have to protect Reinhart, leaving Backlund exposed.

Right now, the cost of acquiring a player (anything other than a pure rental) includes the cost of losing more in the expansion draft than we otherwise would have.

It is a big factor that will really inhibit deadline trades - along with covid protocols for Cdn teams.
Enoch Root is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2021, 09:46 AM   #9145
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
To turn him into a 6'4"235lb mean ass physical enforcer? lol
Don't underestimate a Sutter.
topfiverecords is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2021, 10:23 AM   #9146
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I would consider Bennett + 2nd in the off-season.
That won't work. I can't see Bennett getting qualified. Too much money for too little production. Buffalo can wait until the off season and get him for nothing.
Lanny_McDonald is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 10:31 AM   #9147
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
It's not possible.

The Flames have less than $1M available under the cap right now. So they would have to send more than $4M back the other way. Who would that be?

Even if they wait until the deadline, they would have to send more than $3M back. And then Reinhart would have to quarantine for 2 weeks, leaving only a handful of games left.

Even if the cap could work, would you seriously give up Kylington, a prospect and a 1st for 10-20 games of Reinhart?
I'm no capologist, but aren't the Flames saving quite a bit of dough by having waived Ryan, and others, over the course of the season?

For the sake of balancing cap considerations of the trade, I wonder if including a roster player (one of the three depth adds this past offseason; Lievo, Simon, Nordstrom) moves the needle much. Kylington + Simon (lets say), a 1st, and a prospect? I don't know, maybe it doesn't make sense. With some creativity, I just wonder if it can be done.

Renhart is also an RFA at years end. The intent would be to resign him. I would definitely give up Kylington for him. Kylington is behind Gio, Hanafin, Valamaki, and arguably Mackey. At the moment the Flames need a RS top 6 forward much more than a LS D.
TOfan is online now  
Old 03-16-2021, 10:39 AM   #9148
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
I am wondering if the Flames would have interest in Sam Reinhart. RS top 6 forward who might slot in nicely with SM and JG.

Every indication is that Buffalo is going to have to hit the reset button on their rebuild and start over. It's going to get worse before it gets better there. Can the Flames pry Rienhart out without having to give up much off of the current roster? Could a mix of pics, prospects (not named Zary or Pelettier), and Kylington be enough? Perhaps I am squinting a bit here, but I wonder if the Flames are showcasing Kylington at the moment. Would a 1st, Kylington, and prospect be enough/too much?

It seems to me, and I don't think I am alone, but the biggest need is a RS top 6 forward for the team. With the quarantine rules being what they are, I doubt the Flames will want to give up active roster players. By building a package around futures, which should be of interest the Sabres, the Flames might be able to add Reinhard without having to sacrifice from the current roster.

For further context, I firmly believe based on recent public comments made by Sutter that he came back to win a cup, and with he and Treliving having two years left after this one, that the Flames could start to leverage picks and prospects here in short order.
As weird as this year's draft may be, I don't think CGY should trade a 1st (or if they did, top 10 protected for several years).


I wonder if OTT or VAN might serve as broker for some trades to CAD teams? Requires good relationships with other GMs, and I'm not sure Benning or Dorion are smart enough or have them.

eg.

April 1: Sam Reinhart to OTT for Dzingel + 2nd + 3rd + Prospect(s)
April 12: Reinhart to CGY; 1st+Kylington+Ryan+prospect(s) to OTT (with enough time to flip Ryan I suppose)

It's probably too complicated, and I don't think those values are right. I think it would work better with a true contender, a bubble team, and a rebuilding team.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I would consider Bennett + 2nd in the off-season.

The problem with that though, is that you would have to protect Reinhart, leaving Backlund exposed.

Right now, the cost of acquiring a player (anything other than a pure rental) includes the cost of losing more in the expansion draft than we otherwise would have.

It is a big factor that will really inhibit deadline trades - along with covid protocols for Cdn teams.
Bennett's value will be near zero in the off-season. Instead of paying assets, a rebuilding team can just offer him a 2x2 or something. They could even jump the gun with an offer-sheet at 1 or 2 x 1.439 and not need to give any compensation.
powderjunkie is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 10:47 AM   #9149
Voodooman
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Exp:
Default

Jimmy Vesey is on the waiver wire today. 1 year, $900K contract. Am I crazy, or should the Flames take a flyer and put in a claim?
Voodooman is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 10:57 AM   #9150
Psytic
First Line Centre
 
Psytic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Voodooman View Post
Jimmy Vesey is on the waiver wire today. 1 year, $900K contract. Am I crazy, or should the Flames take a flyer and put in a claim?
Hes basically a warm body at this point that hasn't performed any better than our other bottom 6. Playing a position we are loaded at already. I dont see a need at this point. Better off bringing up Gawdin or somebody from the farm.

Last edited by Psytic; 03-16-2021 at 10:59 AM.
Psytic is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 11:00 AM   #9151
Voodooman
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psytic View Post
Hes basically a warm body at this point that hasn't performed any better than our other bottom 6. Playing a position we are loaded at already. I dont see a need at this point.
I thought he was a natural RW, which seems like the biggest hole at the moment. Given the current group, he’d have a better chance of clicking with 13/23 than the vast majority of the other options. Although Ritchie hasn’t looked terrible in that spot.
Voodooman is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 11:00 AM   #9152
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
That won't work. I can't see Bennett getting qualified. Too much money for too little production. Buffalo can wait until the off season and get him for nothing.
Benny has 2 points in 3 games this season. That’s not bad production!
ComixZone is online now  
Old 03-16-2021, 11:27 AM   #9153
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Voodooman View Post
I thought he was a natural RW, which seems like the biggest hole at the moment. Given the current group, he’d have a better chance of clicking with 13/23 than the vast majority of the other options. Although Ritchie hasn’t looked terrible in that spot.
Big NO to Vessey. In the games vs the Leafs, he was the worst player on the ice. I couldn't believe it given all the hype when he came out from college. He sucks. Think last season's Jankowski.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 11:47 AM   #9154
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

With the Leafs willing to trade a top prospect, I’d deal Giorando and a third for Robertson. The guy should easily be a second line player in short order.
bluejays is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 11:52 AM   #9155
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fleury View Post
With the Leafs willing to trade a top prospect, I’d deal Giorando and a third for Robertson. The guy should easily be a second line player in short order.
Salary cap says hello
ForeverFlameFan is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2021, 11:55 AM   #9156
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I would consider Bennett + 2nd in the off-season.

The problem with that though, is that you would have to protect Reinhart, leaving Backlund exposed.

Right now, the cost of acquiring a player (anything other than a pure rental) includes the cost of losing more in the expansion draft than we otherwise would have.

It is a big factor that will really inhibit deadline trades - along with covid protocols for Cdn teams.
Also right now Sam Reinhart is a far more productive player than Bennett - such that a 2nd doesn't make up for that gap at all.
Jiri Hrdina is online now  
Old 03-16-2021, 12:09 PM   #9157
Classic_Sniper
#1 Goaltender
 
Classic_Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Voodooman View Post
Jimmy Vesey is on the waiver wire today. 1 year, $900K contract. Am I crazy, or should the Flames take a flyer and put in a claim?
If the Flames didn’t take a flyer on Corey Perry, the. no way they take one on Jimmy Vesey.

Still can’t believe Treliving didn’t pick up Flame killer Corey Perry. He’d be one of the top bottom 6 players on the team right now and his presence on the man advantage would be of great help to our anemic powerplay right now.
Classic_Sniper is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Classic_Sniper For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2021, 12:10 PM   #9158
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Mike Commodore is have a blast mocking the Buffalo Sabers today. Using each players plus/minus as a scorecard for the Master golf tournament. It's pretty funny and alarming at how bad they are. Kruger is not the answer there.

Dealing is a raucous-27 and leading the masters by 7 shots over currently being discussed Sam Reinhart

https://twitter.com/commie22/status/...469940228?s=19

Last edited by dammage79; 03-16-2021 at 12:12 PM.
dammage79 is online now  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2021, 12:11 PM   #9159
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Voodooman View Post
Jimmy Vesey is on the waiver wire today. 1 year, $900K contract. Am I crazy, or should the Flames take a flyer and put in a claim?
__________________
Wolfman is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 12:11 PM   #9160
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic_Sniper View Post
If the Flames didn’t take a flyer on Corey Perry, the. no way they take one on Jimmy Vesey.

Still can’t believe Treliving didn’t pick up Flame killer Corey Perry. He’d be one of the top bottom 6 players on the team right now and his presence on the man advantage would be of great help to our anemic powerplay right now.
I have a sneaking suspicion Perry if dealt, will be acquired by the Oilers. Seems fitting given how much all parties involved dislike the Flames.
dammage79 is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:42 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy