09-28-2013, 10:37 PM
|
#61
|
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988
Colborne is either in the NHL or goes on waivers. So yes, he will most definitely be in the NHL.
|
If he shows he simply isn't good enough I bet the flames send him down even if it means losing him. You can't give a roster spot to someone who isn't an NHL player
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:38 PM
|
#62
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
Explain why that is a certainly as opposed to a massive assumption
|
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Colbourne needs to play top six. Wasn't going to get the opportunity in TOR. Will get it in CAL, which is home.
So Backlund and Colborne in the top 6... Stajan on the 3rd line, Monahan on the 4th?
Who wants Monahan playing with Jackman?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:38 PM
|
#63
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
|
Put Backlund on the wing which I think was tried during camp.
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:39 PM
|
#64
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
If he shows he simply isn't good enough I bet the flames send him down even if it means losing him. You can't give a roster spot to someone who isn't an NHL player
|
Then this was a pretty dumb trade.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:39 PM
|
#65
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
|
maybe stajan or backs on the way out?
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:39 PM
|
#66
|
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Then this was a pretty dumb trade.
|
It is a managed risk
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:39 PM
|
#67
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
If he shows he simply isn't good enough I bet the flames send him down even if it means losing him. You can't give a roster spot to someone who isn't an NHL player
|
While I agree in logic, I can't see them giving up a 4th then placing him on waivers. Of course anything is possible.
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:40 PM
|
#68
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman
Put Backlund on the wing which I think was tried during camp.
|
Why? Backlund is proving to be a solid top 6 centreman.
Center is the most valuable position is hockey. Why would we force Backlund, a better and more valuable player, to play on the wing in favour of a worse and less valuable player?
If anything, Colborne should go on the wing.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:40 PM
|
#69
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Colbourne needs to play top six. Wasn't going to get the opportunity in TOR. Will get it in CAL, which is home.
So Backlund and Colborne in the top 6... Stajan on the 3rd line, Monahan on the 4th?
Who wants Monahan playing with Jackman?
|
You can always move someone to the wing. And it really isn't the end of the world if Monahan goes down.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:40 PM
|
#70
|
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Colbourne needs to play top six. Wasn't going to get the opportunity in TOR. Will get it in CAL, which is home.
So Backlund and Colborne in the top 6... Stajan on the 3rd line, Monahan on the 4th?
Who wants Monahan playing with Jackman?
|
Flames aren't just going to give him a top six spot. He will have to earn it
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:41 PM
|
#71
|
|
Draft Pick
|
We COULD send down guys like Horak and Jones to make room for him and Monahan, because based from what ive seen Monahan has been the best centre at camp and we wouldn't run the risk of sending Colbourne through waivers
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:41 PM
|
#72
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I could see Colborne being the 3rd line Center behind Stajan and Backlund.
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:42 PM
|
#73
|
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988
While I agree in logic, I can't see them giving up a 4th then placing him on waivers. Of course anything is possible.
|
If they give him enough of a look to decide he isn't good enough they would. The fourth is a sunk cost and should have no bearing on any decision from this point forward
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:42 PM
|
#74
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Yeah I agree that colborne will probably play wing. I think there's either more moves to come, or the fellow that said Cammy might be out long term could be right.
Monahan is getting sent down after a few games. Which is fine by me. He may e barley NHL ready but I'd rather see him tear up the OHL and the WJC. Will be good for him.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:43 PM
|
#75
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Colbourne needs to play top six. Wasn't going to get the opportunity in TOR. Will get it in CAL, which is home.
So Backlund and Colborne in the top 6... Stajan on the 3rd line, Monahan on the 4th?
Who wants Monahan playing with Jackman?
|
He also doesn't need to play top 6. His skill set may fit in that role.. but its not like the Flames have a top line anyway. They have a bunch of 2nd/3rd line guys to fill the top three lines. Its not like the 3rd line is going to be a big checking/defensive line.
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:43 PM
|
#76
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I suppose, if Colborne can't make the Flames, he probably will pass through waivers anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:43 PM
|
#77
|
|
Norm!
|
Can he play wing, because he hasn't been able to establish himself up the middle.
I want Backlund and Monahan to get their look in the top 6 at center.
Stajan could then play third line center, and Horak or even Bouma on the fourth line.
This is nothing more then a last chance roll of the dice on a disappointing player.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:44 PM
|
#78
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
Welcome beck home Joe. Like the trade.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey_Ninja For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:45 PM
|
#79
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Here
|
Cheap price for a potential top six forward. Hartley managed to get the most out of Stajan and Bouwmeester last season, maybe he can work his magic on Colbourne. Can Colbourne play wing, could see him as a RW on the Cammy-Baclklund line
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 10:45 PM
|
#80
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Could possibly have a lineup like this to start if Cammy is out for awhile:
Glencross-Stajan-Stempniak
Colborne-Backlund-Hudler
Baertschi-Galiardi-D. Jones
Bouma-Monahan-Horak
Extra: Jackman, McGrattan
I'm failing to see the issue in having a couple lines with two centres. Might save our behinds a couple times if one is waived out on a crucial faceoff.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 PM.
|
|
