Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastiche
I don't really get what you're trying to say here. First off, buying worthless pieces of paper is exactly what the banks don't want to do. Creating demand for these bands will drive up their value. In essence they are pursuing a policy to ensure that these bonds don't become valueless. And it's hardly appropriate to say that governments can keep on their current practices. Have you read a single article about Greece lately and their strict austerity measures to qualify for these loans? Kind of weird selective reasoning.
|
Yes they are worthless. If central banks have to step up and create demands for these bonds that's exactly what it is - artificial demand is driving up artificial price. In other words they're creating another bubble that's bound to burst. Sub-prime mortgages sub-prime bonds. Same pig, more lipstick.
ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet denied that the bank had acted under pressure from euro zone leaders, whom he met at a summit on Friday as interbank lending showed signs of freezing in an ominous throwback to the 2008 Lehman crisis. Only the day before, Trichet had denied the bank had even discussed buying government bonds.
Even bankers know that it's a stupid idea, but of course they fold when pressured by "public officials."
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6400PJ20100510
Strict measures? Please. Have a look at Greece, they're up in arms scorching the ground at the slightest "measure" discussed. PIGS are ballooning more and more debt and if going from ~12% deficit to ~8% deficit (dreamland) is a strict measure then I have nothing to say.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastiche
Well this is also somewhat disingenuous. These private banks have been pressured by public office to buy euro debt. Many banks would not be nearly as exposed if it weren't for public policy to support inter-government lending to prop up the Euro. Say what you will of that policy but this isn't really a bailout of private banks. Private banks will suffer alot of pain but you know who will suffer more? Regular European people like you and me if contagion caught. That's the reason for this loan program. And you know what, in the U.S. this policy has so-far worked!
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...a_fact_cassidy
|
Oh if Kerry&Obama fan boys over at new yorker say so it must be true...
...meanwhile, fannie may lost $13.1 billion in the first quarter:
Fannie Mae, the largest U.S. residential mortgage funds provider, on Monday asked the government for an additional $8.4 billion after the company lost $13.1 billion in the first quarter.
The announcement comes less than a week after smaller mortgage finance company Freddie Mac, said it would need $10.6 billion in government funds after losing $8 billion in the first quarter.
The U.S. Treasury took control of the two entities at the height of the financial crisis in 2008 as mortgage losses mounted. The two firms have now tapped about $140 billion in assistance from Uncle Sam's unlimited credit line.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64935O20100510
$140 billion and counting. At that's just fannie and freddie. But yeah it's working and all is swell...
I don't really care what was behind the decision of private banks to finance debt. Greed, political pressure, I couldn't care less. They pocketed profits, they should "pocket" losses too.