Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum > Tech Talk
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-16-2009, 03:25 PM   #1
MissKat
Watcher of Hockey
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default How to run 2 wireless routers off one internet connection?

Reason I ask is because I was told that you can overload a router if you have too many devices hooked up to it/running off it....or if not that then it will degrade your speeds since the bandwidth is branched out.

Later this month I have 2 people moving into my house and they have 2 laptops which will obviously be running wirelessly off my router and a wired console. I current have 1 wireless laptop and 2 wired consoles running off it.

So that will make it

3 wireless
3 wired.
and perhaps another wireless since they have an ipod touch and 2 sony PSP as well.

I also happen to have a spare Linksys WRT54G router (same model as im running now), just different versions. One is a 8.2, the other a 6.0, the 8.2 about a year newer. So is there any way to run 2 of these at the same time and perhaps boost my signals in the house?
__________________
Quote:
"Who's that Boston goalies name?...Thomas? Oh ya Thomas Broduer, and who does he play for again? Oh ya Boston, the Boston Hurricanes?" - words from my Idiot bro in law - biggest noob when it comes to hockey.
MissKat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 09:51 PM   #2
gottabekd
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I'm not an expert on the subject, so if someone is, please correct me where I'm wrong, as a lot of this is assumptions.

Yes, if you have a lot of devices uses the wireless network, you can get some slowdown due to the signals interfering with each other. This would probably only be noticeable if you do a lot of heavy usage on multiple devices (streaming media, online games, downloads). How much of a slowdown, I'm not sure, but it might be negligible.

What you have to remember is all that traffic is going out a pipe much slower than the router. If you do a lot of traffic internally (e.g. streaming media, transferring files from one PC to another), then you might notice a slowdown with all the devices on the wireless network. On the other hand, if you are all just trying to get out on the Internet, your traffic will have to wait it's turn anyways, and the slowdown will be on the outgoing side, not the wireless network side.

It would be possible to set up two wireless routers on the same network. One would have to know a little bit about TCP/IP networking to do it, as most instructions online probably only show you a basic setup.

For the two routers to be of any use, you will need to make sure they use different wavelengths. Devices have a channel setting. There are about 10-11 overlapping channels available for use in North America. You will want to select 2 channels far away from each other to prevent interference.

Even better would be to have an 802.11g router (that operates in the 2.4 GHz range) paired with a 802.11n router (that operates in the 5.0 GHz range).
gottabekd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 09:59 PM   #3
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

I would think your bottleneck would be the connection to the internet, not on the router.

I would try it out and see if there are issues before buying another router. 3 wired plus 3 wireless isn't much- I have 3 wired and 4 wireless in my house running off one router. Maybe not all used at the same time, but 6 devices is well withing what they were designed to do.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 10:13 PM   #4
PsYcNeT
Franchise Player
 
PsYcNeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
Exp:
Default

Yeah, running 3/3 in one router is just fine.

If you are bottlenecking, make sure everyone is setup with a) IP reservation, and b) all their ports properly forwarded.

If it's still slow, get a better ISP.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
PsYcNeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 10:31 PM   #5
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

I agree your problem is probably not your router but your total bandwidth and the use of that bandwidth ( ie torrents/file sharing) that is causing the problem.

If you do decide to set up multiple routers, I think you just need a switch off the modem to give a separate IP to each router. I don't have any experience with this personally though, so I may be confused~
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 12:13 AM   #6
I_H8_Crawford
Franchise Player
 
I_H8_Crawford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

If you want to do 2 routers, here's some great info - I did it for my Xbox, but you can set it up as just a wireless bridge as well.

http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...=xbox+wireless
I_H8_Crawford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 09:04 AM   #7
Ducay
Franchise Player
 
Ducay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Skip the second router, one will do fine. You've got to keep in mind its going to be exceedingly rare that you have ALL 3 laptops, and 3 wired devices at the same time.
And even then, as mentioned, any slow down is going to be due to your internet transfer speeds, not router. 802.11g can handle way more than I would expect you guys would be able to throw at it through the internet.
Ducay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 09:49 AM   #8
sclitheroe
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Exp:
Default

That's not a lot of devices sharing a single wireless access point. One router is fine, its your internet connection that will be the limiting factor for online performance. 802.11g will realistically provide about 30 megabits of throughput, which is probably at least 3 times your available bandwidth at your internet provider.

Even with one or more of the machines making heavy use of the internet (for example, my upstream bandwidth is swamped when running an online backup), the other machines are relatively unaffected for browsing, chatting, etc.
__________________
-Scott
sclitheroe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 02:27 AM   #9
MissKat
Watcher of Hockey
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Thanks for all the insight all.

Anyways, Ive talked to telus and Microsoft and from what theyre telling me, is that since I would be having 2 xboxs and 1 PS3 connected to the same router and modem - to run 2 seperate IPs, each on their own router and modem. Either that or I get a new and preferably gaming router.

Becuse MS told me that there is no ADSL modem out now that supports 2 xboxs. They said if you try to go online under both accounts on both xboxs at the same time, itll most likely boot one out.

I dont want to have 2 networks and 2 IPs going on since itll most likely cost a fortune.
__________________
Quote:
"Who's that Boston goalies name?...Thomas? Oh ya Thomas Broduer, and who does he play for again? Oh ya Boston, the Boston Hurricanes?" - words from my Idiot bro in law - biggest noob when it comes to hockey.

Last edited by MissKat; 02-19-2009 at 02:31 AM.
MissKat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 07:54 AM   #10
PsYcNeT
Franchise Player
 
PsYcNeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
Exp:
Default

I think that MS might be a little off base. If you have the latest firmware for that WRS54G or whatever it should run both.

From personal experience at home (2 Xboxs running off the same network) we've never seen a problem with that, or the new wireless-n router we have.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
PsYcNeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 10:37 AM   #11
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Do you want both Xbox's on Live?

That might be what MS is getting at.

With mine, I port forward specific ports to the static IP set on the Xbox. If you only have one Xbox on LIVE, then there shouldnt be an issue at all.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:45 AM   #12
MissKat
Watcher of Hockey
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT View Post
I think that MS might be a little off base. If you have the latest firmware for that WRS54G or whatever it should run both.

From personal experience at home (2 Xboxs running off the same network) we've never seen a problem with that, or the new wireless-n router we have.
Yes my router has the latest f/w.
__________________
Quote:
"Who's that Boston goalies name?...Thomas? Oh ya Thomas Broduer, and who does he play for again? Oh ya Boston, the Boston Hurricanes?" - words from my Idiot bro in law - biggest noob when it comes to hockey.
MissKat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:46 AM   #13
MissKat
Watcher of Hockey
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
Do you want both Xbox's on Live?

That might be what MS is getting at.

With mine, I port forward specific ports to the static IP set on the Xbox. If you only have one Xbox on LIVE, then there shouldnt be an issue at all.
Yes, I want both xboxs to be able to connect as we will be playing head to head in games.

I have no idea how to port fwd ports on it. Is it nessecary?
__________________
Quote:
"Who's that Boston goalies name?...Thomas? Oh ya Thomas Broduer, and who does he play for again? Oh ya Boston, the Boston Hurricanes?" - words from my Idiot bro in law - biggest noob when it comes to hockey.
MissKat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:54 AM   #14
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The problem is that both Xbox need a separate IP address from your ISP, you cannot nat Live connections.

The easiest might be to do the following, this would be my suggestion.

Assumptions: Both Telus and Shaw give you 2 dhcp addresses.

Set your Xbox with DHCP.

Connect your modem to a dumb hub or switch, connect both xbox to the switch, and connect the router to the switch as well (this allows you to isolate your computers when you want to game head to head via Live). When you want to have both Xbox on Live, you will need to either unplug or turn off your router.

The problem is that that Xbox Live needs a non natted IP address. Meaning that if you have 2 xbox and 1+ computer or other devices plugged into your router, your router doesnt give your xbox an un natted IP unless you port forward (this only works with one xbox, as you cannot do this with 2).

So, when 3+ deivces are plugged into the router only 1 xbox will likely work with live, while the other ip address (home accounts normally are given 2 ip addresses) is taken by your computer.

Your problem on the web from our dark overlords at google. http://forums.xbox-scene.com/index.php?showtopic=338065
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 12:22 PM   #15
MissKat
Watcher of Hockey
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
The problem is that both Xbox need a separate IP address from your ISP, you cannot nat Live connections.

The easiest might be to do the following, this would be my suggestion.

Assumptions: Both Telus and Shaw give you 2 dhcp addresses.

Set your Xbox with DHCP.

Connect your modem to a dumb hub or switch, connect both xbox to the switch, and connect the router to the switch as well (this allows you to isolate your computers when you want to game head to head via Live). When you want to have both Xbox on Live, you will need to either unplug or turn off your router.

The problem is that that Xbox Live needs a non natted IP address. Meaning that if you have 2 xbox and 1+ computer or other devices plugged into your router, your router doesnt give your xbox an un natted IP unless you port forward (this only works with one xbox, as you cannot do this with 2).

So, when 3+ deivces are plugged into the router only 1 xbox will likely work with live, while the other ip address (home accounts normally are given 2 ip addresses) is taken by your computer.

Your problem on the web from our dark overlords at google. http://forums.xbox-scene.com/index.php?showtopic=338065
Damn thise sounds like a lot of work and a big headache lol. Let me call up telus, see how much more it would be to get a spare static IP from them.

I would hate to have to unplug the router each time we want to play xbox, that would be a pain in the arse.

Also, where can I get this dumb hub or switch? and how much do they cost? Whats the exact name of it?

thx apreciate the help.
__________________
Quote:
"Who's that Boston goalies name?...Thomas? Oh ya Thomas Broduer, and who does he play for again? Oh ya Boston, the Boston Hurricanes?" - words from my Idiot bro in law - biggest noob when it comes to hockey.
MissKat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 12:39 PM   #16
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissKat View Post
Damn thise sounds like a lot of work and a big headache lol. Let me call up telus, see how much more it would be to get a spare static IP from them.

I would hate to have to unplug the router each time we want to play xbox, that would be a pain in the arse.

Also, where can I get this dumb hub or switch? and how much do they cost? Whats the exact name of it?

thx apreciate the help.
$50 max, when you go to a computer store and ask for one they will know what you mean.

2 examples are
http://www.memoryexpress.com/Product...MX135(ME).aspx
http://www.memoryexpress.com/Product...X1964(ME).aspx
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 12:52 PM   #17
MissKat
Watcher of Hockey
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
$50 max, when you go to a computer store and ask for one they will know what you mean.

2 examples are
http://www.memoryexpress.com/Products/PID-MX135(ME).aspx
http://www.memoryexpress.com/Products/PID-MX1964(ME).aspx
Damn.

I called telus and they said to get a 2nd static IP that it would have to be through a business. But they give 2 dynamic IPs for each connection.

Im almost tempted to just install a shaw cable connection in the house and run telus and shaw.

Even though im on the fence about having 2 family members move in to our house tommorow, im glad its only or 1yr. Good lordy...
__________________
Quote:
"Who's that Boston goalies name?...Thomas? Oh ya Thomas Broduer, and who does he play for again? Oh ya Boston, the Boston Hurricanes?" - words from my Idiot bro in law - biggest noob when it comes to hockey.

Last edited by MissKat; 02-19-2009 at 12:59 PM.
MissKat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 01:26 PM   #18
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

A switch is useful to have anyways, i wouldnt spend 50$ extra per month on another connection, unless someone else is paying for it
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 01:49 PM   #19
MissKat
Watcher of Hockey
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
A switch is useful to have anyways, i wouldnt spend 50$ extra per month on another connection, unless someone else is paying for it
That suggestion you gave will forsure work? Using the switch and open ports on one of the xboxs? The only bad thing is having to unplug the router each time both xboxs go online. And that pretty much disables computer internet usage during that time.
__________________
Quote:
"Who's that Boston goalies name?...Thomas? Oh ya Thomas Broduer, and who does he play for again? Oh ya Boston, the Boston Hurricanes?" - words from my Idiot bro in law - biggest noob when it comes to hockey.
MissKat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 02:04 PM   #20
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissKat View Post
That suggestion you gave will forsure work? Using the switch and open ports on one of the xboxs? The only bad thing is having to unplug the router each time both xboxs go online. And that pretty much disables computer internet usage during that time.
If your ISP provides you with 2 DHCP Ip addresses that will work. There is no forwarding because a switch is a layer 2 device, just set your XBOX to DHCP the IP address. You may have to reboot the modem and xbox's once after change over.

When the router is unplugged from the switch then the IP address will be free for the Xbox to use.

There is a way to save yourself the cost of a switch, by going into the firmware of your router and turning off the router/firewall functions. A 4 port router is a router with a 4 port switch. But if you arent comfortable with playing with those settings, than ~$35 isnt a crazy cost for ease of use. It baffles me that Microsoft would tell you to setup 2 routers, since its the ISP that is limiting you, adding routers on your end wouldnt assist at all.

You mentioned a PS3earlier, this will not allow all 3 on at the same time, just 2.

I would wait to see if the CP braintrust has any other ideas, I am sure this issue has come up with someone on this site with a PS3 and and Xbox or something similar.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy