06-11-2025, 06:18 PM
|
#1
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Exp:  
|
Flames and Canucks in on Rossi?
|
|
|
06-11-2025, 06:25 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Flames with MILD interest. Likely meaning yeah they'd trade for him but at their price. Canucks can have him really. They're a mess and adding him really probably doesn't move the needle much considering Boesers as good as gone.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-11-2025, 06:26 PM
|
#3
|
First Line Centre
|
He’d be a good add for the right price. Canucks will overpay though
|
|
|
06-11-2025, 06:39 PM
|
#4
|
Needs More Cowbell
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
|
Rossi must be asking for a lot as an RFA.
|
|
|
06-11-2025, 06:49 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7
Rossi must be asking for a lot as an RFA.
|
Sounds like a 7x7 which isn’t outrageous so you have to wonder why the Wild won’t pay him. Likely they know it’s difficult to win with a 5’8 C on any line in the west.
|
|
|
06-11-2025, 07:01 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
He makes more sense for the Canucks who are looking to get right back into the playoffs. In the same Lebrun article that discusses the Canucks really liking the approach Pettersson is taking this offseason and they plan to keep him. They are also desperately trying to keep Hughes so adding Rossi would give them a decent trio of the softest centers in the west when adding Chytil to the mix
|
|
|
06-11-2025, 07:03 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
There will probably be no better center on the market, especially one young and without trade protection, so might as well go for it. We're not in a position to be picky.
This team isn't tanking and going into next season with the 6th worst offense doesn't sound like fun.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-11-2025, 07:12 PM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
There will probably be no better center on the market, especially one young and without trade protection, so might as well go for it. We're not in a position to be picky.
This team isn't tanking and going into next season with the 6th worst offense doesn't sound like fun.
|
I think the Flames can be picky they do not need to blow their assets and cap space on a player unless they really want him.
If the Flames were giving up the 32nd pick and Sharangovich then I would be happy to do it but not for a huge price. I think the Canucks are more desperate.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-11-2025, 07:21 PM
|
#9
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I'm sure we are in for lots of players, for the right price.
|
|
|
06-11-2025, 07:28 PM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
I'd wager the Flames would pursue Byram which would be within their asset budget.
Then use Anderssons return to address the center acquisition.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-11-2025, 07:35 PM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
He makes more sense for the Canucks who are looking to get right back into the playoffs. In the same Lebrun article that discusses the Canucks really liking the approach Pettersson is taking this offseason and they plan to keep him. They are also desperately trying to keep Hughes so adding Rossi would give them a decent trio of the softest centers in the west when adding Chytil to the mix
|
This is all great news for the Flames. Pettersson is a loser who will be a boat anchor contract for the Canucks for years, glad he is staying. I am also happy they think they can keep Quinn who is going to leave in 2 years to play with his brothers, hopefully they get nothing for him and he walks.
|
|
|
06-11-2025, 07:45 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
|
Seems like the right age range and position we’re looking for.
60 points in 82 games puts him third on the team in scoring right behind Huberdeau.
Seems like a no brainer. Here’s Andersson Minnesota.
|
|
|
06-11-2025, 07:49 PM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
This is all great news for the Flames. Pettersson is a loser who will be a boat anchor contract for the Canucks for years, glad he is staying. I am also happy they think they can keep Quinn who is going to leave in 2 years to play with his brothers, hopefully they get nothing for him and he walks.
|
To be fair there was no mention of of Hughes in the article that is my assumption they are trying to win immediately so he considers staying.
|
|
|
06-11-2025, 10:25 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
To be fair there was no mention of of Hughes in the article that is my assumption they are trying to win immediately so he considers staying.
|
He made it pretty abundantly clear to the team he wants to play with his brothers. So unless the Canucks can pull off the impossible and bring the other two brothers there I don't think them being competitive is going to move the needle.
|
|
|
06-12-2025, 02:15 AM
|
#15
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
Let the Nucks overpay for him Craig
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
06-12-2025, 06:09 AM
|
#16
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
He made it pretty abundantly clear to the team he wants to play with his brothers. So unless the Canucks can pull off the impossible and bring the other two brothers there I don't think them being competitive is going to move the needle.
|
Did Hughes make it abundantly clear? How would we know?
As far as I’m aware it was Rutherford who said Quinn would like to play with his brothers. I don’t think Quinn has said anything publicly.
I believe he did say something but how it was phrased matters. We should be careful when we don’t know the context. If Hughes has basically given the Canucks an ultimatum or told them he’s got one foot out the door, they should start looking to move him now and it seems like that isn’t happening, as far as we know…..
|
|
|
06-12-2025, 07:00 AM
|
#17
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calgary
|
Honestly - I really wish they'd quit talking about acquiring players... just tank already. It is abundantly clear that no amount of retooling will have this team competing with a team like Florida.
__________________
Quote:
Can I offer you a nice egg in these trying times?
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to VilleN For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-12-2025, 07:03 AM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN
Honestly - I really wish they'd quit talking about acquiring players... just tank already. It is abundantly clear that no amount of retooling will have this team competing with a team like Florida.
|
At what point do you accept they aren’t going to tank like you want and move on?
I find narrow mindedness frustrating
I believe there is rarely only one right path. There are always several and it’s about picking one and executing it well
This is what I find frustrating about the tank crew
- the constant complaining about something that is not going to change
- the stubbornness to consider alternatives
|
|
|
The Following 28 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
1Nite,
Badgers Nose,
BigFlameDog,
Buff,
Captain Hair,
CF84,
D as in David,
dash_pinched,
GreenHardHat,
Groot,
IamNotKenKing,
jaikorven,
Jay Random,
Morozee,
MrButtons,
NegativeSpace,
Otto-matic,
PepsiFree,
Plett25,
Roof-Daddy,
Sample00,
Scroopy Noopers,
serratedmuffin,
shutout,
Snuffleupagus,
taxbuster,
TOfan,
Yeah_Baby
|
06-12-2025, 07:06 AM
|
#19
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
At what point do you accept they aren’t going to tank like you want and move on?
I find narrow mindedness frustrating
I believe there is rarely only one right path. There are always several and it’s about picking one and executing it well
This is what I find frustrating about the tank crew
- the constant complaining about something that is not going to change
- the stubbornness to consider alternatives
|
I'd go further and say you can take many paths as you don't have to make one singular decision for every single asset.
You can value one player's contribution to the room/culture more than others and not have a "every vet must go" scorched earth plan.
Andersson is great in the room, but they aren't looking to sign him by all reports.
Kadri they see differently.
Make good asset building moves.
If the value of a player acquired is greater than the assets spent and he fits you do it.
|
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-12-2025, 07:13 AM
|
#20
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN
Honestly - I really wish they'd quit talking about acquiring players... just tank already. It is abundantly clear that no amount of retooling will have this team competing with a team like Florida.
|
Is ‘abundantly clear’ becoming the new ‘fired immediately’?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 PM.
|
|