06-28-2024, 09:16 PM
|
#1
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Potential trades that almost happened at the draft
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:17 PM
|
#2
|
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Treliving: The Thread
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:17 PM
|
#3
|
|
All I can get
|
Utah probably wanted Wolf.
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:17 PM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
|
that potential CHI trade would have been wild
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:20 PM
|
#5
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I wonder if missing out on Hage prevented a move up from 28?
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:21 PM
|
#6
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
I wouldn't be shocked if Utah wanted Wolf
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey_Ninja For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:25 PM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Gotta think hawks wanted demidov. That would have been huge
Flames trying to go to 6th for tij is interesting. Would have thought they would try to get Catton with the 6th pick.
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:25 PM
|
#8
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Yeah I'm not that concerned with Flames not moving up to get Iginla.
It was fine if he was there at 9 but using assets to move up to get him would have been tough.
|
|
|
|
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
BlAcKNoVa,
Bs&Cs,
codynw,
ColossusXIII,
devo22,
Enoch Root,
Erick Estrada,
Fighting Banana Slug,
Funkhouser,
GirlySports,
Number 39,
Savvy27,
SeanCharles,
Slanter,
The Hendog,
The Original FFIV
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:27 PM
|
#9
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Yeah I'm not that concerned with Flames not moving up to get Iginla.
It was fine if he was there at 9 but using assets to move up to get him would have been tough.
|
I’m honestly more surprised that Utah went forward. They have absolutely no defense
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:33 PM
|
#10
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8
I’m honestly more surprised that Utah went forward. They have absolutely no defense
|
They wanted the flashy forward with the lineage of a hall of fame father over a dman. Forwards usually garner the most attention and sell more tickets than other position players.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to trackercowe For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:41 PM
|
#11
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
It’s Utah looking for a top pairing Dman for their current team? Rasmus could have been the ask plus 9. If it was Rasmus +28 that would have been an easy deal to make. Iginla and Parekh would have been unbelievable
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:43 PM
|
#12
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Oh yeah i am not invested at all in any of the roster players we have if we could have traded up to get iggy with maybe pick 28 and one of our 2nds. I would love to know what the details were.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SmoggyFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:43 PM
|
#13
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
It’s Utah looking for a top pairing Dman for their current team? Rasmus could have been the ask plus 9. If it was Rasmus +28 that would have been an easy deal to make. Iginla and Parekh would have been unbelievable
|
Im guessing they wanted a roster player and 9. Like maybe Rasmus and 9 for 6 and another later pick (2nd rounder?)
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:48 PM
|
#14
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
|
Imagine the penalty for that dumb comeback against Arizona being losing Andersson for nothing. Ouch.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:52 PM
|
#15
|
|
Franchise Player
|
no, it wouldn't have been Andersson to move up 3 spots, that's beyond ridiculous
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:57 PM
|
#16
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly
Imagine the penalty for that dumb comeback against Arizona being losing Andersson for nothing. Ouch.
|
If it helps you sleep at night, that wouldn't have changed anything. Everything else being equal, if Arizona wins that game and the Flames lose, they both finish with 79 points and Calgary would have still finished higher in the standings, so Utah would have picked first.
Ottawa would have picked 6th, Utah 7th, and Calgary 8th. So, all they missed out on was the chance to draft Catton.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 10:01 PM
|
#17
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Utah probably wanted Weagar + 9th to move up to 6th.
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 10:07 PM
|
#18
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Interesting. Pospisil or Zary maybe?
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 10:11 PM
|
#19
|
|
Franchise Player
|
yeah, I could see it being someone like Pospisil, but if the ask is Weegar or Andersson plus the 9th, Conroy laughs out loud before hanging up the phone
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 10:11 PM
|
#20
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
I'd argue Flames may have drafted the better player at 9th when all is said and done. It would have been terrible asset management to give up anything to move up 3 spots.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:09 PM.
|
|
