Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-28-2012, 10:22 PM   #1
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default Redford: Buyers Remorse?

For those who voted for Redford, in light of the NES and the conflict with BC, as well as the 3 billion taken from provincial savings to "balance" the budget, do you have buyers remorse right now?


I'm hearing a lot of it myself, but that may very well be because I am tuned into hearing it because I am a critic of the absence of fiscal conservatism and the NES.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 10:26 PM   #2
TurnedTheCorner
Lifetime Suspension
 
TurnedTheCorner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

The NES was a groundbreaking home gaming system. I am unopposed to it.

Last edited by TurnedTheCorner; 07-28-2012 at 10:46 PM.
TurnedTheCorner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 10:28 PM   #3
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Can't be worse than Danielle Smith and the Wildrose.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 07-28-2012, 10:31 PM   #4
Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Moscow
Exp:
Default

No buyer's remorse for me. As Bunk suggested, at the very least, I remain certain that she was the lesser of two evils.
__________________
"Life of Russian hockey veterans is very hard," said Soviet hockey star Sergei Makarov. "Most of them don't have enough to eat these days. These old players are Russian legends."
Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 10:44 PM   #5
jonesy
First Line Centre
 
jonesy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Niceland
Exp:
Default

She gambled on national energy thingy and lost big time. I heard someone wonder if we should do a national forestry agreement and charge tolls for BC wood products to cross our borders. Seems she opened a can of worms. I don't think it was a good idea at all. I never voted for her and she is doing things in a way that makes me glad i didn't.
__________________
When in danger or in doubt, run in circles scream and shout.
jonesy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jonesy For This Useful Post:
Old 07-28-2012, 10:45 PM   #6
MoneyGuy
Franchise Player
 
MoneyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Doug Horner would have been the best premier.
MoneyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 10:59 PM   #7
Thunderball
Franchise Player
 
Thunderball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Ideally, Canada would have a unified approach to international energy and commodity trade so we don't look like a bunch of idiots on the global stage like at Copenhagen where two greedy provinces went out of their way to screw over Alberta and by effect, Canada in front of the world. Alison is right on that, but the concept is a little naive. Reality is, Alberta can't afford to look weak in confederation, and Alison is getting a really good lesson on that. Inviting the rest of Canada into this discussion is a sign of weakness to them, like chum in the water, and they're all scrapping away. Canada is a nation of self serving interests, and that's never going to change. BC was supposedly Alberta's best friend, and look how fast that tune changed.

Honestly, she's not doing a good job. But, she doesn't have a bunch of hicks and inexperienced politicians to babysit like Smith would. Frankly, Smith has said some pretty stupid things to the press on energy policy that leads me to believe she wouldn't be a lot better.

BC is really shooting themselves in the foot... even if they get their "royalty toll", Alberta is gonna turn around very viciously and slap a devastating tariff on power lines, pipelines, rail traffic and truck traffic coming into Alberta with foresty, oil, gas or power coming from "environmentally sensitive industries" to get our "fair share" of money for the risk these things present to our province. BC may not be landlocked... but they are isolated, and in a very weak position to dictate terms to anyone.

Last edited by Thunderball; 07-28-2012 at 11:09 PM.
Thunderball is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Thunderball For This Useful Post:
Old 07-28-2012, 11:11 PM   #8
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

I kind of think the cons are gonna shut this BC BS down anyways. Canada should not be a bunch of protectionist fiefdoms.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 11:16 PM   #9
Thunderball
Franchise Player
 
Thunderball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
I kind of think the cons are gonna shut this BC BS down anyways. Canada should not be a bunch of protectionist fiefdoms.
I think they may have to intervene at some point... but its politically tricky now... if the Feds jump in and slap BC on the wrist for screwing around with precarious confederation, they're gonna get creamed in BC by the NDP. I think Harper is hoping things will simmer down through the back channels.
Thunderball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 11:36 PM   #10
c.t.ner
First Line Centre
 
c.t.ner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary in Heart, Ottawa in Body
Exp:
Default

Buyers remorse? Over what Smith and the Wildrose offered up for their vision of where the province should go? Not a chance.

3 months is still pretty early in the whole process and I'll make a full judgement on Redford's tenure in another 6 or 9 months as the whole NES concept progresses. A week of having Clark stomping her feet and pouting to try and save face with a province that's turned sour on her party isn't something that I think torpedoes the entire concept. If anything it makes Clark foolish and B.C. as petty in the face of most of the nation.

So yeah at this time in the middle of summer, I don't have any remorse for voting the PCs back in. Heck, I'd shutter to think the direction we'd be heading if Smith and Wildrose had won their "landside" victory.
c.t.ner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to c.t.ner For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2012, 12:03 AM   #11
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Watch Redford try to introduce a PST in a couple of years.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fire For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2012, 12:08 AM   #12
Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Moscow
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
Watch Redford try to introduce a PST in a couple of years.
PST? Oh, the humanity! When will the tyranny end!?!
__________________
"Life of Russian hockey veterans is very hard," said Soviet hockey star Sergei Makarov. "Most of them don't have enough to eat these days. These old players are Russian legends."
Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Makarov For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2012, 12:14 AM   #13
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

The Redford govt has already flip flopped on the food issue in LTC facilities. I wonder what's next.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 01:46 AM   #14
Barnission
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mission, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
I kind of think the cons are gonna shut this BC BS down anyways. Canada should not be a bunch of protectionist fiefdoms.
If they were going to, they would have already done it before the situation blew up and was overblown. Pearson didn't intervene with Newfoundland and Quebec, and if Harper's history is any indication of what his actions will be, he'll do the same with British Columbia and Alberta.

Besides, there is no actual legitimate reason the federal government could come up with to intervene and force a province to go along with a massive industrial project like this pipeline, other than that they legally could if they wanted to. If they did that, which they won't, British Columbia will turn in to a Conservative wasteland, much like Alberta is for the Liberal Party.

If the federal government came to the conclusion that they will force the pipeline through British Columbia, it would only further cause unnecessary conflict with the provincial governments and the federal government — who knows how Quebec would handle this, let alone British Columbia. God knows how Newfoundland would react, especially if Danny Williams were still premier.

I am not entirely impressed with how Clark has handled this situation, however, both Clark and Redford are grown women, and they all can benefit from this, in more ways than one, too. Clark is simply over reaching, she is not sending an ultimatum. She says she is, but she actually is not.
Barnission is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 07:41 AM   #15
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

The only thing close to buyers remorse is wishing I had worked to get the PC elected where I live; I ended up with a Wildrose MLA and he's done absolutely nothing. Frankly he doesn't even complain about things, and as an opposition MLA thats a core duty!

I'm curious about the NES though. Doesn't the issue with BC basically show exactly why we need one? What failure was there anyway? To me it looks like Redford brought her vision to the provinces and most supported her aside from BC. That is more of a work in progress as opposed to a failure. Then we get to the penultimate question. What would the Wildrose do? IIRC they wanted to build a pipeline to the East or something?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
The Redford govt has already flip flopped on the food issue in LTC facilities. I wonder what's next.
What flip-flop? The AUPE brought forward a problem and its been addressed. I'd have expected the Wildrose to support that course of action actually? They're not suddenly against this now that the PCs addressed it are they?

You want to see flip-flops though, have a look at the Wildrose. Three months ago it was ready to form government (their words, certainly not mine) and what policies remain? They're in favour of paying for gender reassignment surgery, have no problems with eliminating conscience rights, and have nothing of consequence to say on education. They've been relegated to complaining about sending people to the olympics and other miniscule complaints. The only hope for the Wildrose now is the "we can do it cheaper" argument and let me be the first to tell you that is not a policy.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2012, 08:02 AM   #16
Regulator75
Franchise Player
 
Regulator75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
Exp:
Default

fyp
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy View Post
Don Homer would have been the best premier.
__________________

More photos on Flickr
Regulator75 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Regulator75 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2012, 09:32 AM   #17
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Mmmmmm...organized crime.
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 09:47 AM   #18
EddyBeers
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

I thought Redford was going for a National Energy Program (NEP). When and why did the NEP become the NES?
EddyBeers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 09:52 AM   #19
Flames in 07
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Exp:
Default

More glad than ever. The BC premier is just pandering for votes, in the slimy unsophisticated way that works in BC ... and Quebec. National papers that make money on emphasizing regional wedges play up the issue much bigger than it is. The pipeline issue would likely be mediated/arbitrated by Ottawa and Redford is playing it well by telling BC to take a hike but at the same time ensuring the issue doesn't spiral down the toilet.

In related news kindermorgan is about to triple its capacity via expansion, and nobody talks about that!
Flames in 07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 10:24 AM   #20
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov View Post
PST? Oh, the humanity! When will the tyranny end!?!
I will never understand people that want to pay more taxes when we are already grossly overtaxed. It's like they trust the government do a better job with their money then they can.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Fire For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy