Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2017, 11:05 AM   #161
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Are we seriously arguing whether McDavid is the best player in the league?
Goals are more important than 2nd assists. It's still Crosby for now, and I don't even like Crosby.
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:05 AM   #162
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
If the debate after two years in the league is whether McDavid is better than Crosby then he's already won.

I remember posters on here at the start of the season arguing Monahan was, at the time, better than McDavid. Point is , CP may not be the spot for an objective discussion on the matter.

Personally I take Crosby if we're talking about just next season. Anything more than that it's McDavid.

Most importantly I don't think either are unbeatable.
Won what? Won the debate because there is a debate.. Very odd post.

I don't think anyone in the league including Crosby would take Crosby over McDavid to start a franchise because of age. That has very to do with the debate over who is the best player now,
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jason14h For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2017, 11:08 AM   #163
IrishSpring2013
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Won what? Won the debate because there is a debate.. Very odd post.,
agreed...
IrishSpring2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:09 AM   #164
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Won what? Won the debate because there is a debate.. Very odd post.

I don't think anyone in the league including Crosby would take Crosby over McDavid to start a franchise because of age. That has very nothing to do with the debate over who is the best player now,
Fixed that for you.

Damn....I wish I was a Penguins fan. That must be fun.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:11 AM   #165
Beninho
Franchise Player
 
Beninho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Exp:
Default

If you are going to pair Drai with McDavid how much is Drai actually worth? While effective it now seems foolish to have paired him with McDavid as this Drai contract could cause some serious problems. When Edmonton signed Lucic last year I doubt they envisioned Drai producing the amount of points he did this season. If they deployed Drai on his own line as a center the whole season he probably gets 2 mill less than he's about to get, and when you have a player making 13.25 mill every dollar counts.

Last edited by Beninho; 06-28-2017 at 11:16 AM.
Beninho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:17 AM   #166
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

For those saying that McDavid will be the best player in the league for 10+ years, I strongly disagree.

Let's look at Gretzky as a comparable: he was, by a large margin, the best player in the world at 20. McDavid just had his 19/20 season. In Gretzky's 19/20 season he had 164 points and was the best player by a mile. McDavid was the 2nd best player in the league this year, IMO.

8 years later, Gretzky was playing for the Kings. Think about that. In the equivalent of year 7 of McDavid's contract, Gretzky was still great, but he was no longer anywhere near the player he was 4 years earlier.

Can McDavid have more staying power? Maybe. But I would argue two things:

1) for pure offense, players peak from 20 through 27.

2) (far more importantly), the league is much, much deeper than it was in the 80s. McDavid is arguably the best player. Arguable. Gretzky, at the same age, was in a completely different league than everyone else.

This year, Matthews had a better rookie season than McDavid did.

There are new stars entering the league now at a much, much faster rate than in the past.

Will McDavid be the best player in the league for all 8 years of his contract? I would bet it'll be more like 3 or 4 of them, tops. All 8? Not a chance in hell, IMO.

Is $13.25M too much for him? Not at all. However, this idea that he will be substantially better than everyone else for the life of the contract is off-base IMO.

So the real question is: can the Oilers build a winning team around that contract in a cap league? We shall see. But I think it will be very, very difficult.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2017, 11:20 AM   #167
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Pretty hard for McDavid to outscore both of them combined...maybe I'm a homer too
You have to consider that whomever McDavid plays with will likely be more productive as a result. Just like Gaudreau and Monahan help each other. McDavid might get between 100-125 points himself per season in the next few seasons, but he will probably add another 50-75 vicariously through his teammates.

There will definitely be cap challenges when you have a player making that much and the margin of error becomes more tedious for the GM, but McDavid is worth it.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 06-28-2017 at 11:26 AM.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:22 AM   #168
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

The Oiler fan I talked to this morning is just over the moon happy they got the 8 years
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:24 AM   #169
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
The Oiler fan I talked to this morning is just over the moon happy they got the 8 years
Again, I am starting to believe that contract will be a huge burden in years 7 and 8. I honestly think they would have been much better off if it were 5 or 6 (and presumably a little cheaper)
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:28 AM   #170
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Was talking to a group of (much smarter than the average) Oiler fans on the weekend... They were all talking $9.7M. Absolutely convinced. Were sure he would take the lower number to help build a winner.

I said: 5 years at $ 11.5 - 12M or 7 or 8 years at $13.5 - 14M.

Their response (behind condescending smirks): "we'll see"

Yes boys, we will!
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2017, 11:29 AM   #171
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

As someone who believes play without the puck is as important as play with the puck, I have no problem saying Crosby is a better player than McDavid. Maybe McDavid will eventually develop into a relentless forechecking demon who's a nightmare to go into the corner against. But right now I know who I'd rather have on the ice in a game 7.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:30 AM   #172
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Was talking to a group of (much smarter than the average) Oiler fans on the weekend... They were all talking $9.7M. Absolutely convinced. Were sure he would take the lower number to help build a winner.

I said: 5 years at $ 11.5 - 12M or 7 or 8 years at $13.5 - 14M.

Their response (behind condescending smirks): "we'll see"

Yes boys, we will!
Yeah....smarter than the average bear is still pretty low.

McDavid will apparently be the first player in the NHL with a 3-digit number. Burkie will be apoplectic.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:31 AM   #173
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Was talking to a group of (much smarter than the average) Oiler fans on the weekend... They were all talking $9.7M. Absolutely convinced. Were sure he would take the lower number to help build a winner.

I said: 5 years at $ 11.5 - 12M or 7 or 8 years at $13.5 - 14M.

Their response (behind condescending smirks): "we'll see"

Yes boys, we will!
I have had the very same conversations
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:34 AM   #174
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Again, I am starting to believe that contract will be a huge burden in years 7 and 8. I honestly think they would have been much better off if it were 5 or 6 (and presumably a little cheaper)
Nah. All contracts look better when inflation has its way with them.

The only way it looks bad in years 7 and 8 is a career altering injury, which is possible, but not something you can plan for.

I had McDavid at $12.5 so I was a little under. I'm still alright with $13 and happy the Oilers got the 8 years instead of 5.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:36 AM   #175
IrishSpring2013
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

years 7 and 8 is 8 and 9 years away... no way does the contract look worse a decade from now.. its getting through years 2-3-4-5-6 that will be the issue..

what happens to pool party if he breaks out.. there isnt enough cap space as it is. fun stuff. ..
IrishSpring2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:43 AM   #176
timbit
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Exp:
Default

Lucic will be making 6 mil cap hit the next 6 years.

Great news for Oiler fans!!!!!

Inflation will temper the pain.
timbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:43 AM   #177
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

The Canadian buck could play a big role in the viability of this contract. A weak loonie likely means stagnant revenues and a stagnant cap. The cap can only go the direction of revenues, and if league wide revenues take a dive, the big contracts will be the ones that hurt the most. The Canadian buck goes down and the Oilers could be doubly screwed.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:43 AM   #178
icecube
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: compton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Again, I am starting to believe that contract will be a huge burden in years 7 and 8. I honestly think they would have been much better off if it were 5 or 6 (and presumably a little cheaper)
How will Connor McDavid be a burden? If he's playing with one arm and one leg maybe. The amount of money he makes that franchise is a drop in the bucket compared to what they're paying him.
icecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:44 AM   #179
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain View Post
Nah. All contracts look better when inflation has its way with them.

The only way it looks bad in years 7 and 8 is a career altering injury, which is possible, but not something you can plan for.

I had McDavid at $12.5 so I was a little under. I'm still alright with $13 and happy the Oilers got the 8 years instead of 5.
I'm not saying he'll be a terrible player in years 7 and 8.

What I'm saying is that, in order for that contract to be good value, he has to be the best player in the league.

And I am predicting that he will only be in that conversation for about 5 years.

As for cap erosion, I would not be banking on a lot of that if I were you. Two big issues working against continued cap inflation:

1) the Canadian dollar
2) TV deals (read: cable)

Neither look overly promising at the moment.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:44 AM   #180
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

The Oilers are betting on cap increases every year. Some Oiler fans figure that by the time the contract is up the cap will be at or over 100 million. so this becomes the bargain contract of the century.

The heat is on for McDavid already, there are a lot of Oiler fans that aren't happy about the dollar value. Every time McDavid gets shut out someone is going to bring up that he gets paid $207,000 Cdn each game. If he gets crushed in a playoff series like he did against the Ducks, the Oiler fans base will be



If the Oilers have to do more with less, and they can't bridge the gap with good drafting and development, they've arrived where the Blackhawks are now after winning their cups.

On top of that, a think team usually becomes a playoff victim, not a playoff victor.

If Drai's contract is over $7.5 the same thing applies and lets be honest, Draisaitl had a great season, but he's wildly inconsistent, but his agent is going to dig in, he has too many advantages. But if Drai doesn't absolutely not only light it up, but show $5 million or more worth of consistency that fan base is going to turn on him.

To me the 8 year term is irrelevant for McDavid's contract. The gamble is on the cap going up and on McDavid carrying the Oilers to the cup. If the cap doesn't go up enough or he can't carry a subpar depth chart deep into the playoffs every year, the Oilers will move him by the end of year 5 for maximum rebuild assets.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021