01-12-2021, 03:48 PM
|
#141
|
Franchise Player
|
man this thread evolved into something else entirely than what I expected.
I don't really feel comfortable commenting on the subject of the thread anymore.
|
|
|
01-12-2021, 03:49 PM
|
#142
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Good luck Centennial Bank!
Why is it when our direct competitors best players are having difficulties we no longer have to play against them?
Did Centennial Bank invent COVID? Are there Pangolins in their safe??
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
01-12-2021, 03:51 PM
|
#143
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
Good luck Centennial Bank!
Why is it when our direct competitors best players are having difficulties we no longer have to play against them?
Did Centennial Bank invent COVID? Are there Pangolins in their safe??
|
I personally think Zoom did it
|
|
|
01-12-2021, 03:53 PM
|
#144
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
man this thread evolved into something else entirely than what I expected.
I don't really feel comfortable commenting on the subject of the thread anymore.
|
Putting all else aside...its an Elite Athlete going Bankrupt.
Nothing that hasnt happened before and wont happen again.
The only thing that makes this slightly strange is that Kane is still young and under contract and poised to earn a bunch more money.
Which is why I wonder about the legality of it all. Its just interesting. His gloating about being rich is just a bit of schadenfreude.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
01-12-2021, 03:54 PM
|
#145
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
I personally think Zoom did it
|
But.....thats actually not a bad conspiracy theory. I'll allow it.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
01-12-2021, 04:12 PM
|
#146
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coquitlam, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
No, this is in fact the exact problematic statement.
I feel like it's largely just getting passed over here, but this is a perfect example of how we as a society might inadvertently treat people of colour differently. Someone pointing that out isn't because they want to see it. Red made the same comment about my exception to Banana phone being referenced in this thread.
Just because you don't think you were being racist by doing something does not absolve that action as inherently racist. Intent actually doesn't matter.
|
It's largely getting passed over here because most people agree the comments with regard to Kane have had nothing to do with the colour of his skin. (Banana-phone comment aside, perhaps a better approach would have been to politely, and correctly, point out that using that term in a thread involving a Black or Asian person could be easily misconstrued. Not everyone is as woke as you.)
I think there are many times where discussions around race are necessary and enlightening, but what I find ironic is that by bringing race into conversations when it's not warranted "we as a society might inadvertently treat people of colour differently".
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BloodFetish For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-12-2021, 04:42 PM
|
#147
|
Norm!
|
I mean I respect someone that takes care of his family. But when you have 5 million owing on loan guarantees for family businesses for example, then clearly your family is a big part of the problem.
Hey Evander I have this great idea for a ferrett grooming business, I need 5 million dollars to get it off of the ground.
I've read where some athletes have talked about having to learn to say no to family and friends and how to grow a thick skin with the "You've changed since you got rich retort". Having three houses doesn't help, and a million in a half in documented gambling debts usually makes me want to ask about un documented gambling debts.
I've hear that the NHL does a decent job with rookies in terms of teaching them about the trappings of becoming rich too fast. But shouldn't Kane's agent have done some work on making sure he had the resources to say "Stop draining my bank" or "I can't loan you money or guarantee your businesses" Or "I don't need three freaking homes"
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
01-12-2021, 04:50 PM
|
#148
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
No, this is in fact the exact problematic statement.
I feel like it's largely just getting passed over here, but this is a perfect example of how we as a society might inadvertently treat people of colour differently. Someone pointing that out isn't because they want to see it. Red made the same comment about my exception to Banana phone being referenced in this thread.
Just because you don't think you were being racist by doing something does not absolve that action as inherently racist. Intent actually doesn't matter.
|
I don't entirely disagree with you in a general sense, but sometimes a banana is just a banana.
And yes, of course intent matters, it's just not the singular or major factor to consider.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien
If we can't fall in love with replaceable bottom 6 players then the terrorists have won.
|
|
|
|
01-12-2021, 05:47 PM
|
#149
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Section 203
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I mean I respect someone that takes care of his family. But when you have 5 million owing on loan guarantees for family businesses for example, then clearly your family is a big part of the problem.
Hey Evander I have this great idea for a ferrett grooming business, I need 5 million dollars to get it off of the ground.
I've read where some athletes have talked about having to learn to say no to family and friends and how to grow a thick skin with the "You've changed since you got rich retort". Having three houses doesn't help, and a million in a half in documented gambling debts usually makes me want to ask about un documented gambling debts.
I've hear that the NHL does a decent job with rookies in terms of teaching them about the trappings of becoming rich too fast. But shouldn't Kane's agent have done some work on making sure he had the resources to say "Stop draining my bank" or "I can't loan you money or guarantee your businesses" Or "I don't need three freaking homes"
|
Many players need better agents/financial/accountants in their circle.There are way too many stories of athletes going broke because of the people they surround themselves with. It's especially tough for hockey players, since they don't make anywhere near the money that players in the other Big 4 sports make. The average NBA player made over 8.3 MM dollars last year. Only 29 NHL players will make more than that this year, with that number going down with the 75% reduction.
It must be really tough for guys who came from nothing, who finally make millions, to say no to their friends, family, and people acting like they are friends just for money. It also is required they learn to say no. Few of them learned financial management along the way since none of them are allowed to earn any money until they are a professional. Then they get $3MM and think that money is unlimited because their dad made $40,000 working at the mill and he survived. They also need to think of what happens after the career ends, because they hopefully have another 40-50 years to go.
It's a great idea to invest in some businesses, but odds are your 45 year old cousin, who has never run a business, will not be successful in his new venture for stealing air out of bike tires.
__________________
My thanks equals mod team endorsement of your post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Jesus this site these days
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnet Flame
He just seemed like a very nice person. I loved Squiggy.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I should probably stop posting at this point
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to squiggs96 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-10-2021, 12:44 PM
|
#151
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: stuck in BC watching the nucks
|
Interesting...I don't think creditors will not like missing out on the rest of what is owed to Kane.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien
Let us not befoul this glorious day with talk of the anal gland drippings that are HERO charts.
|
|
|
|
03-10-2021, 12:46 PM
|
#152
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Wow. That would be huge. He’s having a good season for them this year (20 points in 23 games). Obviously this isn’t hockey-related but still.
|
|
|
03-10-2021, 12:51 PM
|
#153
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
|
Is there precedent for a club/player agreeing to void a contract like kane's? Seems very strange...
|
|
|
03-10-2021, 12:52 PM
|
#154
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary
|
How does that affect his next deal if this one is voided?
I know zilch about bankruptcy. Will voiding this contract stop the Sharks from signing him again?
|
|
|
03-10-2021, 12:55 PM
|
#155
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
|
I can't read that article... on what basis are they looking to void this contract?
|
|
|
03-10-2021, 12:58 PM
|
#156
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sunnyvale
|
Are they simply considering voiding his contract to allow him to avoid having to re pay creditors? If so that is a sleaze bag move by both the Sharks and Kane.
__________________
The only thing better then a glass of beer is tea with Ms McGill
|
|
|
03-10-2021, 01:00 PM
|
#157
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
Is there precedent for a club/player agreeing to void a contract like kane's? Seems very strange...
|
There have been numerous examples of players and teams mutually agreeing to terminate contracts. The key is that both parties have to agree to terminate the contract.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey-and_stuff
How does that affect his next deal if this one is voided?
I know zilch about bankruptcy. Will voiding this contract stop the Sharks from signing him again?
|
I don't think there is anything in the CBA that expressly forbids them from signing Kane again after terminating the contract. However one could make the case that by voiding the contract and then signing him again the Sharks are re-negotiating Kane's contract which is not allowed per the CBA. Depends on how the NHL and NHLPA will want to interpret and enforce the clause but I would bet on them not allowing it because it sets a precedent for other teams and players to renegotiate contracts.
That being said this is more than likely a negotiating tactic for settling the debts. Kane's lawyers are threatening to take away the main source for the creditors to recoup their money and trying to get them to take pennies on the dollars for what they are owed.
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-10-2021, 01:00 PM
|
#158
|
Franchise Player
|
He thought the Washington Generals were due
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-10-2021, 01:01 PM
|
#159
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
There have been numerous examples of players and teams mutually agreeing to terminate contracts. The key is that both parties have to agree to terminate the contract.
I don't think there is anything in the CBA that expressly forbids them from signing Kane again after terminating the contract. However one could make the case that by voiding the contract and then signing him again the Sharks are re-negotiating Kane's contract which is not allowed per the CBA. Depends on how the NHL and NHLPA will want to interpret and enforce the clause.
That being said this is more than likely a negotiating tactic for settling the debts. Kane's lawyers are threatening to take away the main source for the creditors to recoup their money and trying to get them to take pennies on the dollars they are owed.
|
Yeah, I came to say this.
This is so, so greasy.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
03-10-2021, 01:02 PM
|
#160
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Sutton
Are they simply considering voiding his contract to allow him to avoid having to re pay creditors? If so that is a sleaze bag move by both the Sharks and Kane.
|
Not really. Lenders should have done their diligence and should have known this could be a possibility. Lenders take risk and they didn’t assess it properly obviously.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:09 AM.
|
|