Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-29-2024, 10:51 PM   #1921
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zary's-Mustache View Post
Where are people seeing the Quinn hughes comparison? I saw the video where they compare them and really I don't see them similar at all.

Their skating is so different. Their stick handling is different. Hughes looks smaller on the ice and seems to go around guys with his skating but doesn't stick handle much unless he's going to the outside.

I see Parekh more similar to Makar where he uses head fakes a lot and stick handles to the inside more and gets shots through.

Hughes has a hard time getting shots through from the point. He was absolutely useless against the Oilers shooting from the point.
The comparison comes from the fact that he wants to control the puck and control the offensive set-up. His ability to change direction and create his own space is extremely Hughes-esque. Are they the same player? Of course not. But the way he controls the blueline, and creates space, and moves in to use the wrist shot (as opposed to the Bouch-bomb) is exactly like Hughes.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2025, 01:00 PM   #1922
Tibnadian_tpd
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
He was the consensus #2/3 pick by most experts and considered the best dman in a draft full of great dmen. I get the Demidov argument, it was a toss up, but by drafting Levshunov, it pushes their dmen down one spot and might well solidify their dmen roster for years to come.

I didn’t see one expert pan the pick, just the opposite.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tibnadian_tpd View Post
I cannot get behind the drafting of Aryom Levshunov by the Blackhawks at number 2. I think he could be a solid but unspectacular player, and it's just too high to take him at that spot. I think the Blackhawks are going to look back on this draft and regret seeing many players they should have taken ahead of Levshunov, such as Demidov, Parekh and Buium.
Revisiting the Chicago Blackhawks pick of Levshunov at #2 half a season later, and the writing is now on the wall with his slow adjustment to the AHL, that he will very likely be looked at as a worse pick than many players taken after him. Players such as Demidov, Parekh and Buium who are having very good seasons (Demidov scoring highlight reel goal after highlight reel goal in the KHL pro league to boot), are amongst the players that are turning out to be better prospects than Levshunov. This is without even considering lesser prospects like Catton, Tij Iginla etc, who could also turnout better. Although Levshunov was the consensus #2 pick as determined by the "experts", he just never truly had a ton of "skill". He currently has 11points in 34 AHL games. He always seemed like a player that could at most become a second pairing NHL dman with the ceiling of 40-50 points on the offensive end. The experts were mistaken in their assessment of Levshunov right from draft day. He was ultra aggressive both offensively and defensively in college, masking his lack of puck skills. He has always been a good skater with a great physique, coupled with questionable decision making and mid tier skills. Hopefully for the Blackhawks he can turn it around, but at least Conroy was able to draft a future all star in Parekh at #9, imagine if we had pick #2 and drafted the "experts" consensus pick Levshunov.
Tibnadian_tpd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2025, 01:06 PM   #1923
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Hawks were beyond stupid to skip on Demidov. Demidov/Bedard had the potential to be a modern Hull and Oates.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2025, 01:12 PM   #1924
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Yeah. Of all the players projected to go in the top 10, Levshunov was by far the one I was the least interested in. I’m never a fan of the “safe” pick who does everything well but nothing elite. With forwards, that usually means a ceiling of a 2nd liner and with defencemen it’s usually a ceiling of a 2nd pairing. I know there can be a higher bust risk with other players but I think that risk is generally worth it if the upside is to get a superstar. That’s what I like about the Parekh pick.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2025, 01:15 PM   #1925
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

I'm not debating if he should have been #2. However, he is just 19 years old playing on a bottom third team in the AHL. I think he missed training camp with an injury, as well. He has tons of runway
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Canada 02 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2025, 01:17 PM   #1926
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Yeah. I am not ready to call a D man a bad pick until they're 21 atleast.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2025, 01:21 PM   #1927
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

To be fair, I don't have anything against Levshunov, I just think the Hawks were dummies for skipping on the potential of a top line pairing of Bedard/Demidov. A decade of destruction IMO.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2025, 01:21 PM   #1928
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Hawks were beyond stupid to skip on Demidov. Demidov/Bedard had the potential to be a modern Hull and Oates.
The error now potentially compounds because if they don't have confidence in Levshunov (though I think it's premature to say that) then they could draft Schaefer instead of a forward. Which means they still are not bringing in forward talent to help Bedard.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2025, 01:23 PM   #1929
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tibnadian_tpd View Post
Hopefully for the Blackhawks he can turn it around, but at least Conroy was able to draft a future all star in Parekh at #9, imagine if we had pick #2 and drafted the "experts" consensus pick Levshunov.
Yeah. Although I think the rumours were that the flames were high on Lindstrom, Demidov and, obviously, Iginla. Had they been picking as high as 2nd overall, I think they would have selected one of them. With mixed reactions today likely. Iginla and Lindstrom are injured for potentially the rest of the season which could affect their development - especially with Lindstrom because it seems like a serious back issue. And Demidov is not a centre - which the organization desperately needs.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2025, 01:24 PM   #1930
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada 02 View Post
I'm not debating if he should have been #2. However, he is just 19 years old playing on a bottom third team in the AHL. I think he missed training camp with an injury, as well. He has tons of runway
Yeah and you can't really make a straight line comparison between Levshunov, Buium, Parekh, Dickinson etc because the AHL is a major step up in competition for a 19 year old.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2025, 01:24 PM   #1931
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

It’s early still but I have not been overly impressed with Chicago’s drafting in this rebuild. They are reminding me a lot of Edmonton who could only draft with high picks and, even then, were poor at developing them.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2025, 01:26 PM   #1932
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
It’s early still but I have not been overly impressed with Chicago’s drafting in this rebuild. They are reminding me a lot of Edmonton who could only draft with high picks and, even then, were poor at developing them.
That's what happens when you strip a team down to the studs. Young players have to play before they're ready and their development struggles.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2025, 01:31 PM   #1933
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

I hate the Hawks and hope they bomb, but they had 8 1st round picks the last 3 seasons and two more this season. I'm afraid of what is coming in 3-5 years
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2025, 01:36 PM   #1934
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada 02 View Post
I hate the Hawks and hope they bomb, but they had 8 1st round picks the last 3 seasons and two more this season. I'm afraid of what is coming in 3-5 years
Good point. If the flames exchanged their vets (Backlund, Coleman, Huberdeau, Kadri, Weegar and Andersson) for the Chicago vets, the team would look to be in dire condition as well - despite the solid drafting they have done. The prospects (like Chicago’s) are a few years away from being ready.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2025, 01:47 PM   #1935
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
The error now potentially compounds because if they don't have confidence in Levshunov (though I think it's premature to say that) then they could draft Schaefer instead of a forward. Which means they still are not bringing in forward talent to help Bedard.
I may be misunderstanding the rule but didn't they just win two lotteries in a row? Or does it have to be #1 overall?
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2025, 01:48 PM   #1936
Ba'alzamon
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Levshunov is a D1 playing in the AHL lol. How many defenders do that? Kylington and Honka are the only ones I can think of, and Levshunov is much better defensively than either of them at the same age.

tough crowd.
Ba'alzamon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ba'alzamon For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2025, 01:49 PM   #1937
Ba'alzamon
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
I may be misunderstanding the rule but didn't they just win two lotteries in a row? Or does it have to be #1 overall?
IIRC it's only if you move up as a result of the lottery. Last year they just stayed at 2nd, so I don't think it counts toward the limit.
Ba'alzamon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2025, 02:02 PM   #1938
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ba'alzamon View Post
IIRC it's only if you move up as a result of the lottery. Last year they just stayed at 2nd, so I don't think it counts toward the limit.
Yeah, a team can only win twice if they actually move up
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2025, 02:05 PM   #1939
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Seems premature to call the blackhawks stalled out. They have a bunch of guys playing well in the NCAA right now, Frank Nazar who is too good for AHL but maybe not good enough for NHL yet... Sacha Boisvert still looking pretty good. Kantserov is picking up lots of points in the KHL. Nick Lardis looks pretty good.

Definitely don't see an oilers comparison with how they are drafting. Not at all.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2025, 02:14 PM   #1940
YyjFlames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
To be fair, I don't have anything against Levshunov, I just think the Hawks were dummies for skipping on the potential of a top line pairing of Bedard/Demidov. A decade of destruction IMO.
This is a legitimate criticism, but I still like the pick over Demidov. When a team is still relatively early in a rebuild, pick the top defender in a defense heavy draft and the top forward in a forward heavy draft the next year.

They'll get their guy to play with Bedard in 2025, or they'll pick another centre and will have a crazy one-two punch with a super talented defender feeding them for the next decade -- similarly to the Penguins.
YyjFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy