Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-15-2010, 02:08 PM   #161
worth
Franchise Player
 
worth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
We had a special nick name for guys like that. What was that name . . . Its so far in the past its hard to remember. Oh yeah . . . the bullet catcher.
AKA pink mist
worth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 02:14 PM   #162
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

I am a big clutz.... so I know i would probably survive the battles ok, and then trip off a cliff or something stupid like that.
Knut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 02:15 PM   #163
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3 Justin 3 View Post
That was Blythe in BoB.

I'd be the guy running and gunning like Spears.
Getting men in his company needlessly killed?

I liked his character as well, but after watching him and the members of Dog company take the 3rd gun on Day of Days - I dont think anyone would want to be like Spears.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 02:20 PM   #164
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Everyone likes to think they would be Spears. In reality, I don't think anyone of us, biggest tough guy or whimpiest whimplet, would know until thrust into the actual moment.

In some ways, I think that's what draws men to war....to find a little truth in who they really are.
Most people think that they would be Audie Murphy in battle, but in reality they'd be more like Eddie Murphy.

The first rule in combat as we were taught by our instructing Warrant Officer was "Keep your $#@#$@#%$ head down"

The second rule was "Watch where you $#@#$@#% step"

The third rule was "Keep your $%#$%#$^# head down"
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 02:25 PM   #165
GoinAllTheWay
Franchise Player
 
GoinAllTheWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Not sure
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastiche View Post
Actually the end of the battleship era was previewed in the Atlantic theatre where large battleships like the Hood and Bismarck were demonstrated to be pretty much useless.
Useless? What sank the Hood? The bloody big battleship you mentioned, the Bismark. And in 10 mins flat. Seems fairly useful to me. That ship also took a monstrous beating but still stay afloat. It took the entire British Navy and Airforce to sink it and only because it's rudder was to damaged that it couldn't make it back to port.

The battleship didn't become useless until the missle became mainstream.

And no, I never did wonder why the carriers were out at sea, they were doing manoveurs.
GoinAllTheWay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 02:36 PM   #166
flip
Lifetime Suspension
 
flip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sec 216
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf View Post
I liked it a lot

I also like that it seems they are going to focus on more than one group, makes it distinct from BoB

Yeah, I read a review that said they will focus on 3 guys for the 10 shows instead of just following one company around.
flip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 02:52 PM   #167
3 Justin 3
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: On my metal monster.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
We had a special nick name for guys like that. What was that name . . . Its so far in the past its hard to remember. Oh yeah . . . the bullet catcher.
I am too thin to catch bullets. Everything would just whiz right by me and I'd capture the enemy bunker for 50 points.
3 Justin 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 02:56 PM   #168
flip
Lifetime Suspension
 
flip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sec 216
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3 Justin 3 View Post
I am too thin to catch bullets. Everything would just whiz right by me and I'd capture the enemy bunker for 50 points.
Yeah but you'd die because you'd empty an entire clip in an enemy guy and then he'd kill you with his nube toob.
flip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 02:56 PM   #169
Cowperson
CP Pontiff
 
Cowperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A pasture out by Millarville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoinAllTheWay View Post
Useless? What sank the Hood? The bloody big battleship you mentioned, the Bismark. And in 10 mins flat. Seems fairly useful to me. That ship also took a monstrous beating but still stay afloat. It took the entire British Navy and Airforce to sink it and only because it's rudder was to damaged that it couldn't make it back to port.

The battleship didn't become useless until the missle became mainstream.

And no, I never did wonder why the carriers were out at sea, they were doing manoveurs.
And the Bismark was effectively rendered to turn in circles, waiting for the British battleships to finish her off, by a few obsolete bi-planes. (The Hood was a WWI era ship, effectively obsolete compared to the Bismark).

As late as Gulf War I, the US Navy found it useful to have a great big battleship blowing things up on land but it had been many, many decades since that kind of behemoth could sail around without air cover for protection.

Quote:

The Pearl Harbor attack plan had two immediate goals; the destruction of American aircraft carriers known to frequent the area, and the sinking of as many other capital ships as possible, especially battleships.

http://www.wtj.com/articles/pearl_harbor/
I'll stick by the point the Japanese found the Taranto ambush very instructive . . . . . and I think Japan had about 10 fleet carriers at the start of WWII versus about four for the Americans which indicates where their thoughts were lying.

The Japanese were doing pretty well holding their own initially but for every carrier sunk, they lost valuable, highly trained pilots which they could never replace.

America, in turn, could turn out an infinite supply of highly trained pilots and continually updated equipment, hence the Great Mariannas Turkey Shoot later on.

At the end of the war, America had about 100 aircraft carriers in the Pacific alone.

Cowperson
__________________
Dear Lord, help me to be the kind of person my dog thinks I am. - Anonymous
Cowperson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 03:04 PM   #170
worth
Franchise Player
 
worth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowperson View Post
At the end of the war, America had about 100 aircraft carriers in the Pacific alone.

Cowperson
Serious? Source for this?
worth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 03:08 PM   #171
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowperson View Post
And the Bismark was effectively rendered to turn in circles, waiting for the British battleships to finish her off, by a few obsolete bi-planes. (The Hood was a WWI era ship, effectively obsolete compared to the Bismark).

As late as Gulf War I, the US Navy found it useful to have a great big battleship blowing things up on land but it had been many, many decades since that kind of behemoth could sail around without air cover for protection.



I'll stick by the point the Japanese found the Taranto ambush very instructive . . . . . and I think Japan had about 10 fleet carriers at the start of WWII versus about four for the Americans which indicates where their thoughts were lying.

The Japanese were doing pretty well holding their own initially but for every carrier sunk, they lost valuable, highly trained pilots which they could never replace.

America, in turn, could turn out an infinite supply of highly trained pilots and continually updated equipment, hence the Great Mariannas Turkey Shoot later on.

At the end of the war, America had about 100 aircraft carriers in the Pacific alone.

Cowperson

The American's stumbled across the strategy of building cheap Jeep or Escort Carriers in the second World War. They were slow compared to the fleet carriers, held about half the amount of planes and were half the size of the Fleet Carriers that the Americans had.

If you were going to compare in modern turns the British carriers that sail today would be considered Jeep carriers compared to the monsters that the U.S. Navy put out.

The American's built 150 aircraft carriers in WW2 120 of which were the jeep or escort which mainly stuck to convoy duties.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 03:08 PM   #172
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by worth View Post
Serious? Source for this?
I've heard that number as well, keep in mind that they were not all the large size carriers we think of but smaller versions like escort carriers.

Edit: Beaten in a much more accurate way by the Captain.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 03:09 PM   #173
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by worth View Post
Serious? Source for this?
I can confirm this, the American's built 150 carriers in the WW2, the majority of which ended up on Pacific duty.

Again the majority were smaller slower escort carriers.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 03:10 PM   #174
Pastiche
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Enil Angus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoinAllTheWay View Post
Useless? What sank the Hood? The bloody big battleship you mentioned, the Bismark. And in 10 mins flat. Seems fairly useful to me. That ship also took a monstrous beating but still stay afloat. It took the entire British Navy and Airforce to sink it and only because it's rudder was to damaged that it couldn't make it back to port.

The battleship didn't become useless until the missle became mainstream.

And no, I never did wonder why the carriers were out at sea, they were doing manoveurs.
Besides sinking another useless battleship what did the Bismarck actually do in WWII? Answer: absolutely nothing

That was the lesson of the big battleships you so proudly defend. They were useless in naval warfare. A crappy aircraft carrier with freaking bi-planes took that thing out. It doesn't take a genious naval planner to realize what the future of Naval power would be looking directly at the example of the Bismarck.
Pastiche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 03:25 PM   #175
GoinAllTheWay
Franchise Player
 
GoinAllTheWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Not sure
Exp:
Default

/\/\/\/\

Ok first off, proudly defend? Hardly.

2nd - The Brits pretty much focused ALL of their attention in sinking the Bismark in retaliation for the Hood. When you have an entire nations armed forces out for blood looking for a SINGLE ship that is pretty much all by itself, it doesn't have much chance. Even at that it took an increcible amount of effort. Everything from the water line up was pretty much blown off the ship due to the massive bombardment it recieved. I could be wrong but I think they even had to get on board and plant charges to get it to go down.

It took the ENTIRE NAVY/AIRFORCE to sink it, the biplane you speak of did nothing but damage it's rudder. Had it been able to sail properly to port it would have made it back inot battle and God only knows what damage it would have done. If it truly was useless, why would Germany have launched it in the first place?

Last edited by GoinAllTheWay; 03-15-2010 at 03:27 PM.
GoinAllTheWay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 03:56 PM   #176
Cowperson
CP Pontiff
 
Cowperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A pasture out by Millarville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoinAllTheWay View Post
/\/\/\/\

Ok first off, proudly defend? Hardly.

2nd - The Brits pretty much focused ALL of their attention in sinking the Bismark in retaliation for the Hood. When you have an entire nations armed forces out for blood looking for a SINGLE ship that is pretty much all by itself, it doesn't have much chance. Even at that it took an increcible amount of effort. Everything from the water line up was pretty much blown off the ship due to the massive bombardment it recieved. I could be wrong but I think they even had to get on board and plant charges to get it to go down.

It took the ENTIRE NAVY/AIRFORCE to sink it, the biplane you speak of did nothing but damage it's rudder. Had it been able to sail properly to port it would have made it back inot battle and God only knows what damage it would have done. If it truly was useless, why would Germany have launched it in the first place?
It took a few obsolete bi-planes to render the Bismark a sitting duck for the British warships to finally catch up to.

Any other interpretation is ridiculous.

(Incidentally, the British lost the aircraft carrier Ark Royal in their pursuit of the Bismark. Submarine attack.)

Regarding escort carriers, the most famous engagement they were involved in was the Battle of Samar Bay near the Phillipines where a small force of American ships, including a few escort carriers, held off a much larger Japanese force bent on destroying a largely unguarded American supply fleet anchored nearby. This would have been a disaster for the Americans and a humiliation for Admiral Halsey who went off on a wild goose chase.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_off_Samar

Cowperson
__________________
Dear Lord, help me to be the kind of person my dog thinks I am. - Anonymous
Cowperson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 04:22 PM   #177
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowperson View Post
It took a few obsolete bi-planes to render the Bismark a sitting duck for the British warships to finally catch up to.
I don't disagree with this at all. At the start of the war Battleships weren't really designed for air threats, especially low level air threats like torpedo planes. Frankly if that torpedo had hit anywhere else it probably would have bounced off of the Bismarks lower armour belt. A torpedo shot like that disabling the rudder after being dropped off of a vintage bi-pane would be equivalent to Luke Skywalker hitting a thermal exhaust port right above the main port that was only two metres wide.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowperson View Post
(Incidentally, the British lost the aircraft carrier Ark Royal in their pursuit of the Bismark. Submarine attack.)
Submarines were devestating against Carriers in WWII.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowperson View Post
Regarding escort carriers, the most famous engagement they were involved in was the Battle of Samar Bay near the Phillipines where a small force of American ships, including a few escort carriers, held off a much larger Japanese force bent on destroying a largely unguarded American supply fleet anchored nearby. This would have been a disaster for the Americans and a humiliation for Admiral Halsey who went off on a wild goose chase.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_off_Samar

Cowperson
Funnily enough they refered to this in the Hunt for Red October when Jack Ryan tells Ramius that he wrote a book on Halsey and his command decisions at Leyte, and Ramius replied "I know this book Ryan, your conclusions were all wrong, Halsey acted stupidly.

Its often theorized that Midway might have been lost by the American's if Halsey was in charge. Its thought that Halsey would have continued the attack to find the remaining Japanese Carriers after the sun went down, even though the Japanese were considered to be superb night fighters. Nimitz on the other hand looked at his winnings looked at the risks of continuing to attack the Japanese fleet and called his planes home.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 04:44 PM   #178
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

I have a book that says the correct answer is... 99 carriers had been readied for the planned invasion of Japan. It doesn't say if they were all deployed when the nukes went off though.

24 fleet carriers
75 escort carriers

Number of total aircraft - 4730
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 05:13 PM   #179
cal_guy
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowperson View Post


and I think Japan had about 10 fleet carriers at the start of WWII versus about four for the Americans which indicates where their thoughts were lying.
The Japanese at the time of Pearl Harbor had 3 escort carriers(Taiyo, Chuyo, Ryujo) and 6 fleet carriers(Shokaku, Zuikaku, Soryu, Hiryu, Akagi, and Kaga).

The US Pacific fleet had four fleet carriers(Lexington, Saratoga, Yorktown, and the Enterprise) and another two in Atlantic that would be transfer to the Pacific fleet early in the war(Wasp and Hornet), plus another carrier that remained in the Atlantic for the duration of the war(Ranger).
cal_guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 05:21 PM   #180
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I don't disagree with this at all. At the start of the war Battleships weren't really designed for air threats, especially low level air threats like torpedo planes. Frankly if that torpedo had hit anywhere else it probably would have bounced off of the Bismarks lower armour belt. A torpedo shot like that disabling the rudder after being dropped off of a vintage bi-pane would be equivalent to Luke Skywalker hitting a thermal exhaust port right above the main port that was only two metres wide.
It was a flu-key hit for sure, the Bismarck was a feared beast and for good reason, It took direct hits of 400 shells from various British ships to sink her even as a sitting duck, over 80 of which were from the 12 to 16 inch variety.

A Bismarck tribute


This is a must see. The pride of the British fleet feels Bismarks wrath, of the 1421 sailors...3 survive.(one of them comments in this vid)
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:19 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy