Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Other Sports: Football, Baseball, Local Hockey, Etc...
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-01-2025, 08:39 PM   #161
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sainters7 View Post
Quitting is one thing, but we're talking about other teams being able to hire active coaches to their teams mid-season. Why are teams allowed to interview current coaches for lateral moves mid-season anyway? It's odd. And results in people who routinely do it - like Kiffin - to be widely reviled for it, as we're seeing.
Well he doesn't consider it lateral I guess.

The coaches have all the power here. If a school tried to get a non-compete clause, they'd never be able to hire the coach they really want. Kiffin would certainly never have agreed to something like that at Ole Miss.

Yes Kiffin is reviled but if he wins they will love him in BTR. Doesn't strike me as a guy that cares a lot about honor and legacy. Well other than he wants to be known as a guy who won a natty.

He almost accepted the Auburn job a few years ago. He campaigned for the Alabama job. And rumor has it he told his assistants he was going to Florida earlier this year until a better job came along.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2025, 08:44 PM   #162
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Non-compete clause would surely not be legal. Buyout money with offsets is a quasi non-compete clause because you won't be able to collect it all unless you stay out of coaching. I also doubt teams would go European soccer and start having release clauses in coaches contracts that would force another school to pay someone to take their coach, but it would be better hedge than a non-compete IMO.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2025, 08:48 PM   #163
Sainters7
Franchise Player
 
Sainters7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: back in the 403
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Well he doesn't consider it lateral I guess.



The coaches have all the power here. If a school tried to get a non-compete clause, they'd never be able to hire the coach they really want. Kiffin would certainly never have agreed to something like that at Ole Miss.



Yes Kiffin is reviled but if he wins they will love him in BTR. Doesn't strike me as a guy that cares a lot about honor and legacy. Well other than he wants to be known as a guy who won a natty.



He almost accepted the Auburn job a few years ago. He campaigned for the Alabama job. And rumor has it he told his assistants he was going to Florida earlier this year until a better job came along.
Oh agreed about Kiffin. This isn't a hill I'm going to die on, that's true how it would make it harder for schools to hire their true #1. Safe to say it just has a greasy feel to it, it's an odd quirk you don't see in the pros. You'd also think it'd be more damaging to a coach's reputation like Lane than it seems to be..

LSU fans just better not act shocked when it inevitably happens to them to...though I know they will.
Sainters7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:46 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy