Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Yeah, it is funny how perceptions are formed: playoff beast Sam Bennett over his career has -2 points and +3 EVS points in 30 playoff games than utterly useless playoff-performer Sean Monahan.
|
Yes that's true. However, lets look at last year's playoff stats in terms of points per 60 minutes played. Bennett produced quite a bit more. But Monahan was actually 2nd on the team.
1. Sam Bennett: 3.137
2. Sean Monahan: 2.629
3. Milan Lucic: 2.368
4. Johnny Gaudreau: 2.304
5. Dillon Dube: 1.987
6. Mikael Backlund: 1.859
7. Andrew Mangiapane: 1.850
8. Elias Lindholm: 1.758
In 2019, Bennett did even better:
1. Sam Bennett: 4.533
2. Matthew Tkachuk: 2.052
3. Rasmus Andersson: 1.933
4. Mikael Backlund: 1.795
5. Jusso Valimaki: 1.788
6. Sean Monahan: 1.316
7. Elias Lindholm: 1.250
8. Andrew Mangiapane: 1.096
Monahan produced more than Gaudreau and Lindholm during both years. But Bennett was way better than anyone else on the team. He also led for PP per 60 and even strength per 60 in both years.
Monahan and Gaudreau were bad in 2019, but improved quite a bit. Bennett also led the team in points per 60 minutes during the 2017 playoffs (other that Versteeg, who is gone).
To those who are blaming Treliving for not trading Bennett during the off season, why would he trade the one proven playoff performer? How would that help the team get past round 1?