Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Other Sports: Football, Baseball, Local Hockey, Etc...
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-25-2011, 04:49 PM   #161
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by secol View Post
consider though that if hinske could play catcher he'd probably have an everyday job somewhere so imo napoli isn't too bad....26 HR's last year was tops for catchers in the MLB
Ya he would have been alright if his average bounces back and he doesn't get 6 mil in arbitration, just personally don't enjoy watching the unathletic high strike out type players. He definately hits lots of solo shots but also was also pretty high up the AL strikeout list last year too.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 05:00 PM   #162
secol
Powerplay Quarterback
 
secol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
Ya he would have been alright if his average bounces back and he doesn't get 6 mil in arbitration, just personally don't enjoy watching the unathletic high strike out type players. He definately hits lots of solo shots but also was also pretty high up the AL strikeout list last year too.
true but in terms of SO/AB he was better than overbay
secol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 05:38 PM   #163
flames_1987
#1 Springs1 Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayP View Post
This trade makes no sense considering our stable of RH relievers already.
He fills in for the loss of Downs, lefties only hit .205 against him
flames_1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 05:40 PM   #164
flames_1987
#1 Springs1 Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesaresmokin View Post
What the hell is anthopolous doing here? You've gotta think this was an ownership move and not a gm move. This leaves some pretty big question marks at first/catcher as well as offensively if arrencibia/snider don't have solid years.
I doubt Toronto ownership had anything to do with this, especially when you hear A.A talk about how long they've wanted Francisco.

You may have some question marks offensively, but you give Arrencibia and Snider a chance to grow as young players. This is not a team set on contending for a playoff spot this season.
flames_1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 05:56 PM   #165
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesaresmokin View Post
What the hell is anthopolous doing here? You've gotta think this was an ownership move and not a gm move. This leaves some pretty big question marks at first/catcher as well as offensively if arrencibia/snider don't have solid years.
Personally I like the move, anytime they can add another solid arm to the pitching staff (especially the Relief Pitchers). That's a good thing.

As for a question mark at 1st, I doubt its a problem. I am sure Lind will be fine as the every day 1st baseman.

As for the Catching duties, I like the combo of JP and Molina. Hopefully JP can develop into a solid Catcher....

As for Napoli I bet he puts up decent numbers this year but it was hard to figure out how he fit into the Jays lineup....

I bet the next move for AA is find another Bench player.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2011, 06:13 PM   #166
dustyanddaflames
Powerplay Quarterback
 
dustyanddaflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesaresmokin View Post
What the hell is anthopolous doing here? You've gotta think this was an ownership move and not a gm move. This leaves some pretty big question marks at first/catcher as well as offensively if arrencibia/snider don't have solid years.
I don't think that the Roger's Corp. would have decided to make a move like this simply based on the difference of Napoli/Francisco salary difference (if that was what you were referring to). I think that was moreso a move to bolster their bullpen, and getting something for their best trading piece at a position of strength.

Arencibia is the catcher of the future, and he is going to have to get his innings in some time, why not now when you aren't planning on being a "legitimate" contender for the next year or two? Molina is a nice cheap option that seems like a really good guy to groom a young catcher. Napoli was the odd man out, 3 catchers and 2 everyday 1B/DH with Lind/Encarnacion. The deal makes a lot of sense to me for the Blue Jays actually, and I continue to like what A.A. has done.
The rebuild process is never easy, but if done correct is well worth its wait.
dustyanddaflames is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 06:32 PM   #167
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Also, it's easier to gain a draft pick or from a reliever than from a position player who doesn't have a set position like Napoli.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2011, 10:59 PM   #168
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

I'm not a huge fan of this deal, though I trust AA, simply because AA admitted he made the deal to not keep Napoli in limbo of what was next. He made the deal as quick as possible and that was a tad unfortunate because Napoli has quite a bit of pop in his bat and I'd have thought you would be able to get a little more, but AA's reasoning was sound and reasonable. You can always use the extra picks in baseball, and I don't mind that as well in order to continuously year after year, stock the farm. Any idea when the draft is this year?
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 11:20 PM   #169
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
Also, it's easier to gain a draft pick or from a reliever than from a position player who doesn't have a set position like Napoli.
This.
Napoli is a lousy fit long term and would have finished the season in the 1B/DH class of free agents and had no shot at type A status.

Another shrewd move by AA.
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 11:21 PM   #170
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fleury View Post
Any idea when the draft is this year?
The draft is in June.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2011, 05:35 AM   #171
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

AA might still be making trades, but Lawrie looks like he's going to get a shot in spring training.
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 05:53 AM   #172
zukes
Nostradamus
 
zukes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London Ont.
Exp:
Default

I like this move, having Napoli here would have been nice for the added dingers, but it would have been too easy to give up on Lind or Arencibia, Cito-style if they had a veteran like that. Lind should be fine, and there will be growing pains with Arencibia, but he needs to be able tpo play through them and not be looking over his shoulder every time he slumps.

Need to find out what they have in him.

This also gives the team 4 guys who have closing experience, plus as pointed out Francisco does well against lefties, something Dotel struggles mightily with.
__________________
agggghhhhhh!!!
zukes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 07:56 AM   #173
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

MLB top 50 Spects. Jays place 3 guys!

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?...s_mlb&c_id=mlb
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 12:31 PM   #174
JayP
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
Also, it's easier to gain a draft pick or from a reliever than from a position player who doesn't have a set position like Napoli.
Yeah, that is true.

Here's a good analysis of the trade that breaks it down from all angles:
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index...for-francisco/
JayP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 07:27 AM   #175
Cheese
Franchise Player
 
Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

Blue Jays State of Franchise Meeting:

AA met with fans yesterday.

Earlier, he said the team was committed to a first base-DH combo of Adam Lind and Edwin Encarnacion, whom he suggested could hit 30 home runs this year.
Anthopoulos added that the savings from the Wells deal -- even after the Blue Jays apparently included US$5 million in the trade to the Angels -- can potentially be used this year on international free agents and in the draft, further strenthening a farm system he described as the "lifeblood" of the franchise.
Cheese is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cheese For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2011, 11:59 AM   #176
dustyanddaflames
Powerplay Quarterback
 
dustyanddaflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

MLB radio is reporting that Anthopolous is potentially in on the Chone Figgins deal to Oakland, and are speculating Kouzmanoff heading to Toronto. Makes a lot of sense, in that it'll free up Bautista to go back to RF.
dustyanddaflames is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 12:25 PM   #177
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustyanddaflames View Post
MLB radio is reporting that Anthopolous is potentially in on the Chone Figgins deal to Oakland, and are speculating Kouzmanoff heading to Toronto. Makes a lot of sense, in that it'll free up Bautista to go back to RF.
.283 OBP... yuck.

By comparison Bautista had a .378 and Rivera a .312. I don't know enough about Kouzmanoff to rate his fielding but unless it's fantastic I think I'd rather the jays pass.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2011, 12:36 PM   #178
JayP
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
.283 OBP... yuck.

By comparison Bautista had a .378 and Rivera a .312. I don't know enough about Kouzmanoff to rate his fielding but unless it's fantastic I think I'd rather the jays pass.
The stats at Fangraphs.com rate him very highly defensively. Using UZR/150, he was 2nd for all 3rd basemen last season and was 5th for a 2008-2010 split.
JayP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 12:37 PM   #179
Jiggy_12
Franchise Player
 
Jiggy_12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

AA just doesn't stop. Interesting to see how this one pans out, all just rumours and speculation at this point...everyone saying it's Kouzmanoff but no official word on who goes the other way. Lots of people speculating it would be Frasor...all this from the thread on the jays board.
Jiggy_12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 12:40 PM   #180
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Kouzmanoff is an exceptional 3B defensively and is similar to Napoli, but in a position that we don't really have anyone to play at, especially with Lind/EE at 1B.

Basically, we upgraded our pen by getting Francisco, while keeping the calibre of player that Napoli is, but at a position that we actually need.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy